Animalism, Earthism

[Serendipper]

@Artimas

We should have a half socialism system, half of our system focused on necessities and the other half as capitalism for luxuries, the un-needed things that we use as comforts or pleasures.

Man that is concerning that capitalism is juxtoposed with necessity and equated with luxury.

The only possible unique definition of capitalism is exploitation of workers. That’s it. Capitalization on X is the exploitation of X. “I capitalized on this situation. I exploited this situation to my benefit.”

A worker co-op where workers are co-owners of the means of production can peddle the goods they produce in a 100% free market.

A worker co-op can make a profit and invest those profits with the expectation of making more profit.

The ONLY thing that doesn’t exist in a worker co-op is the exploitation (capitalization) of the worker by the capitalistic owner of the means of production.

Therefore, capitalism = exploitation. Period. Full stop.

“But but but…” No buts! Don’t believe the propaganda.

What? You thought the most refined propaganda system in the history of the world wanted you believe socialism is good? Why do you think it’s such a bad word? How can they remain in control if they can no long exploit people for profit? How can wealth be concentrated in a free society without propaganda demonizing your very salvation?

Champions of capitalism are cows defending the slaughterhouse.

[Jakob]

[Jakob]

If any of the many millions of apparent Socialist sympathizers really wanted a the sort of equal distribution of profit as advocated by promethean, then they could just go about and do that. Nothing stands in the way of people founding companies that distribute the profits equally among the workers.

We can ask why does this not happen?
I see three reasons immediately

1. once push comes to shove they decide against sharing the profits
2. they’re not capable of creating a company which enough people want to buy from
3. they think the only proper socialist way is violently taking ownership of other peoples work

[barbarianhorde]

As always the only problem capitalism ever faces is that of monopoly.

Monopoly always leads to fascistic tendencies, and in the end to the Socialist Hail-State, which always immediately collapses into a criminal oligarchy, from which a kind of Napoleon, Caesar or Putin can emerge. Usually no such figure emerges, and the nation falls into complete decay, until foreign powers take it apart.

Trump is no such figure, mind you. He is American.
America is writing the future, not basing itself on anything that came before it. It wants none of the dank past, maybe it wants a few of its treasures but not enough that it clutter the view on the road.

[barbarianhorde]

Monopoly is what might happened to the Dinosaurs, rather than a meteor.

They had no competition so they could eat too freely, so they at everything and then starved, after first tearing each other apart - the species consumed itself after it had consumed all the rest.

This is btw what islam prohencizes will come as the end of days; a monster that grows by drinking water drinks all of the oceans and then comes ashore and eats everything.

[barbarianhorde]

Capitalism:
Making something that a lot of people want and getting powerful because of it. Using loans or other peoples money to get there is the usual way.

The rest: (crime, and all other isms)
Taking the invention of another and using it to control people.

[barbarianhorde]

Whats gonna happen is a new thing will be invented to make markets on a whole other level.
Its the cornerstone of civilization that still has to be invented.
Xept its been invented.
On paper.

Too costly for its inventor to finance.

Capitalism is right now a caterpillar, treacherous little creeper and yet it harbours the butterfly. Renaissance is the path.

[Jakob]

I see there are still people here who have the idiotic insensitivity to be against Trump. How is that possible after the past weeks?

[barbarianhorde]

Is this just propaganda or what?
I hope so.

THE MOST DANGEROUS COUNTRIES IN EUROPE FOR WOMEN HAVE LARGE MUSLIM IMMIGRATION
Statistics link Muslim immigration in Europe to sexual violence.
September 6, 2018 Daniel Greenfield
Share to Facebook5.6KShare to TwitterShare to More422Share to Print
73
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical left and Islamic terrorism

Sweden has one of Europe’s highest rates of sexual assaults.

At 120.79 violent sexual assaults per 100,000 people, and 56 rapes per 100,000, the otherwise bleak socialist country ranks as having the second highest rate of sexual violence in Europe.

What makes Sweden so exceptionally dangerous for women? Its militant feminism is embedded in its political culture and its educational system. Sweden has boasted of a “feminist foreign policy”, 61% of Swedes in one survey identified as feminists and hold the strongest views on “gender equality” of any Europeans. Swedes are the most likely to believe that it’s okay for men to cry. Only 11% believe that women should take care of the home and only 10% believe that it’s a man’s job to support his family.

A local branch of the Left Party in Sweden even demanded that men urinate while sitting down.

And then there are the Czechs, just 13% identify as feminists, 77% think that a woman’s place is in the home, yet the sexual assault rate is 7.79 per 100,000, a tiny fraction of feminist Sweden.

If the real issues were feminism and toxic masculinity, if sufficient educational indoctrination about the evils of masculinity is needed to “teach men not to rape”, women should be safest in Sweden.

So what went wrong?

Instead of traveling from Stockholm to Prague, let’s take a closer trip over to neighboring Finland.

Finland has a third of Sweden’s rape rates and a quarter of its sexual assault rates. Its numbers are still far higher than most of Europe, but nowhere near those of Sweden.

What could possibly explain the difference?

Finland is also fairly feminist, but the Muslim proportion of its population is only a third of Sweden. Finland has a third of Sweden’s Muslim population proportion and a third of its rape rate.

Sweden has the second highest non-indigenous Muslim immigration population rate in Europe and the second highest sexual assault rate in Europe. It would be foolish to pretend that this is a coincidence.

Take Ireland and the United Kingdom. The UK tops even Sweden in Europe’s sexual assault and rape statistics. At 130.96 per 100,000 for sexual assaults and 50.68 per 100,000 for rapes, the United Kingdom is the most dangerous place for women in Europe. One analysis claims that 1 in 5 women will be sexually assaulted and that 3.1% of women were assaulted in just the last year.

But then why do the numbers for nearby Ireland look so strikingly different? Like Finland, Ireland’s numbers are high, but nowhere near as high as those in the United Kingdom.

The UK’s sexual assault and rape rates are roughly four times as high as those of Ireland. And at 6.3% versus 1.4%, the difference in Muslim population percentages is in almost perfect proportion.

London, with its great diversity, has the highest rape rate within the United Kingdom.

Finland was once part of Sweden. Ireland was once part of the United Kingdom. Unlike comparing distant countries where differences can be accounted for by a great variety of factors, Finland and Ireland serve as a kind of control group measuring the impact of immigration on Europe.

Belgium, which hosts the capitals of the European Union and of Islamic terrorism, is in third place. At 65.92 sexual assaults and 25.50 rapes per 100,000, women are unsafe in the capital of the EU. Meanwhile Hungary, the country in the news for its clashes with the EU over admitting Muslim migrants, has a sexual assault rate of 2.45 and a rape rate of 3.82.

Belgium has the third highest Muslim population rate and the third highest sexual violence rate.

Brussels has a thousand programs and regulations pushing feminism. Hungary has a wall. The lesson from Sweden and Brussels is that if you want to stop rape, professional feminism doesn’t work, walls do.

At 0.86, Serbia has one of the lowest sexual assault rates in Europe. And at 8.8, France has one of the highest. Eastern European countries, generally not known for their militant feminism, have low rates while the more “progressive” Western European countries suffer from very high rates.

The Netherlands has the fourth highest sexual assault rate in Europe and the fourth highest non-indigenous Muslim population rate. Germany has the sixth highest assault rate and the sixth highest Muslim population rate. Not all the numbers add up so well, but those that do are quite disturbing.

There are European countries with low Muslim population rates, but high sexual assault rates. Portugal, Finland and Latvia are all examples. But there is no European country that has a high Muslim immigrant population and a low rate of sexual violence. All of the top Muslim immigrant countries are in the red.

The differences are sometimes striking when measuring culturally dissimilar neighbors.

Germany sits next door to Poland. Sexual assaults in Germany clock in at 33.55 while in Poland, they’re at 1.40. Muslims make up 6.1% of Germany and less than 0.1% of Poland.

The statistics suggest that the key factor is not necessarily a high Muslim population, but a high Muslim immigrant population. Bulgaria has a sizable Muslim population that has been living there for a very long time. And its sexual violence rates are quite low. It’s particularly immigrant populations coming from societies with a very different set of Islamic mores that lead to epidemics of sexual violence.

European countries with ancient Muslim populations don’t appear to have large sexual assault rates. It’s the countries that admitted large numbers of Muslim migrants in a matter of decades that are suffering.

Islamic doctrines and Arabic cultural mores that permit, explicitly or implicitly, the sexual assault of non-Muslim women who are not dressed properly or walk unaccompanied by a male relative, are pernicious. And Muslims rapists in Europe and Australia have cited belief and culture in their defense. But mass migration is often inherently disruptive, breaking down values and trust in stable communities.

That trust then has to be rebuilt in ways that the media and the entertainment industry frequently reduce to simplistic moralizing tales about trusting people who are different, but that in practice take generations to restore lost social capital. There can be gains along the way, but any honest accounting must measure the horrifying losses, including these shocking assault rates, against the gains.

Sweden has the second highest non-indigenous Muslim population rate in Europe and the second highest sexual assault rate in Europe. Belgium has the third highest Muslim population rate and the third highest sexual violence rate. The Netherlands has the fourth highest sexual assault rate in Europe and the fourth highest Muslim population rate. Germany has the sixth highest assault rate and the sixth highest Muslim population rate. Are all of these numbers just a random coincidence?

Feminist government policies don’t stop sexual violence. Not when the same feminist governments open the borders to mass migrations from countries where women have no legal or cultural rights.

The more open a European country is to Muslim mass migration, the more dangerous it is to women.

[barbarianhorde]

I like the concept of forbidding peeing while standing up.

They should also forbid it for women though. It doesn’t happen much but I saw it once in a fucking public street in Rome. A lady just lifted up her dress and went to work on the cobblestones.
No. I can tell you. No good.