The defense for that would be that the necessary physical laws also require a vast amount of otherwise useless space. Think about how useless an oven would be if its sole purpose was to bake a single wedding cake or perhaps all of the mass required to produce a single diamond.
And if that wasn’t enough, there would also be the defense that the purpose for the rest of the universe simply hasn’t been yet discovered or perhaps become yet relevant in the development of Man.
It had other life during that time. There may have been life on other planets during that time.
And there is no requirement that an intentional universe has to be built in a short period of time (6 days?). Perhaps it takes billions of years to get to the point of human habitability.
You’re asking me to speculate on the size of the universe? If the physical laws are the same all over, then humans can potentially live on other planets in other galaxies. So in that sense, it is conducive to humans everywhere. In the sense that people can’t live on Jupiter or even underwater on Earth, then you are right.
At this point in time, humans don’t know about the fundamental roots of the universe. I’m looking at probabilities and what seems more likely. A random universe seems highly unlikely.
Do you mean that man is as free as nature is a sign and that this is because signs are bound in language?