Or somewhere between, …I find sax to be very relaxing, where a trumpet is rather brash.
Not that I don’t appreciate you chaps knowledge, I am enjoying that. Yet naturally there is a common ‘sax sound’ that we all know, as opposed to all the variations of the instrument.
But to me, it seems as bad of a missconception to claim that there is one sax which has the “representative sax sound” to claim that there is one heavy metal distortion that is the “representative distorted guitar sound.”
K: More about Ken Burns? More about Jazz? More about Miles? More about me? (doubtful)
Pezer: More about jazz. I am but a doltish young 'un, and I would love to hear what an old timer has to say about jazz.
K: Unlike the crowd here, I don’t like Coltrane. His “love Supreme” irks the hell out of me. As a sideman to MILES, he
was pretty good, but his solo stuff just doesn’t do it for me.
I like pre-WW one jazz especially Armstrong. “West end blues” is great.
Early and I mean early, Duke Ellington, is worth a listen to.
The big bang era isn’t really that bad, once you lose the idea that your parents, well in your case grandparents, listen to it.
Billy holiday was the bomb. Listen to “Strange Fruit” and realise it was about lynching.
One really off idea is to listen to Steely Dan because their stuff is really jazz tint rock, the 70’s stuff,their album “Asia”
for example.
Now I happen to like earl klugh and bob James but they are acquired taste and not everybody
likes that stuff.
If you can find a good internet jazz radio station, your jazz education is in good hands.
The Spirit can be found within the jazz section of iTunes. They play the tunes, and then tell you what they played, so you can identify what you like and what you don’t.
Here’s a nice Stan Getz. This is with Chick Corea - another name that is a guide to quality. Corea has played with a lot of top musicians, and has written a lot of material that is widely played.
I realise that my attempt to find a comparative with the sax on the hazel o’connor track was deeply flawed. jazz just isn’t anything like that, indeed what’s so good about it is its freedom.
…
Thanks for the links typist.
peter
Yea some of what I’ve been hearing is from that era, or at least pre WW2. that’s what I meant by ‘pure jazz’.
Thanks, awesome subject! The more jazz I hear the more I realise its been a massive aspect to my listening experience, its just in so many other areas of music.
two albums just came to mind. Thelonious Monk, “straight, no chaser” and
the single greatest jazz album of all time, period. Miles Davis " Kind of blue".
Of jazz violinist, three come to mind: Stephane Grappalli, Jean-luc Pointy and Noel Pointer.
Yea that defines everything I don’t like about interpretative or expressive and free jazz done wrongly. Not that I don’t applaud the sentiment though, in music a mass of craziness creates a few moments of genius.
Still I like pure jazz, and very rarely interpretations of it.
Blues is cool too yes of course, but it moves more into what we’d now call popular music, whereas jazz is kinda its own thing, as different to other genre’s as say classical music.
Jazz is kinda like my philosophy, it just kinda happens without rhyme or reason to its basis.
No idea. It’s miles davis and cannonball alderly. I also like pretty much anything frmo thelonius monk. wynton marsallis is playing in my city in the next couple of weeks, and I can’t get a single motherfucker to go.
I kinda have a way of testing good music, my dawg [dog]. He seems to know good music, he loved; kind of blue, but when I put ‘breaking out’ [as above] on, his ears kept twitching ~ I think to him its like a great dane chasin’ a bunch or terriers ‘roun the place.