[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hii17sjSwfA[/youtube]
So what’s the big deal? Every computer slows down when the volume of work it’s asked to do exceeds its abilities. Are you saying that the illuminati are trying to tamper with the market or something? Or that it’s going to cause the end of the world?
Yes, of course. I did not say that sex segregation was only a non-western value. I was referring to the present resp. to the last phase of the western modernity we are living in. The modernity of the western culture stands for the sex non-segregation.
The non-segregation began in education, first of all in schools, during the 15th, 16th, 17th, 18th century (depending on the regions) and became more and more normal in many other public institutions too - until it was seen everywhere in western societies. So what we currently experience are merely the consequences of this civilized modernity (although rests of the former segregation could also be seen, yes). But the egalitarian(istic) goal has not been reached yet, and it is difficult to foresee whether it will be reached in the future: 100% equality for 99% of all humans. What does „100% equality“ mean? I would say: “Death”!
That is an important question. When I analyze and interpret some certain current behaviors, I tend to answer: “segregate them immediately!”; but when I analyze and interpret some other current behaviors, I tend to answer: “go on with the non-segregation”. I think that we can’t stop or change this development by keeping forms like liberalism, egalitarianism, fraternalism (or its female equivalent), or a form of governing like democracy, because, as far as they are all typical forms of western modernity, they are also reasons for this non-segregation. So if I value it as a historical fact resp. as a truth, then I deductively conclude that we shouldn’t change it, because this process will change by itself, thus will end sometime anyway. Having said that, there are also arguments that cause me to think it would be better to stop this process or to go forewards by also going backwards (like a crab). 
[tab]
[/tab]
I honestly think that most human’s lives are better when men and women are more segregated than not segregated. My main argument for this thesis is a natural/evolutionary resp. cultural/historical one. Humans try to overcome nature/evolution by their culture/history, but at last they always fail, because they have to - due to their incapability of being gods. So this trial will end up just like an error - and probably cause a huge disaster. I do not see how this can be avoided or prevented - to delay it is at least no real solution (our offspring will have to pay the prize - namely the more the more we delay and will delay it). Our current rulers do not and will not change their behavior. They want and will want this huge disaster. 99% of all humans will not be needed anymore but considered as the “global problem”. Machines can and will replace them (and later possibly take over [ viewtopic.php?f=1&t=185562 ]).
And be honest: Would you like to give up machines, for example: an automobile or a washing machine? We do not really need computers, cellphones and other high tech machines. So we could give them up. But we do not want to give up many other machines, namely those that are invented in the late 18th, the 19th, and the early 20th century. In other words: We will not get rid of the ghosts we have asked for (freely based on J. W. von Goethe).
This question should be connected with a second question: For whom?
Considering the 99% of all humans, there are more minuses than pluses for both men and women. Considering the 1% of all humans, there are more pluses than minuses for both men and women, but more for men than for women.
When it happens every time the markets go down it looks a lot like intentional rigging. May the gods fucking forbid that the United States stock market ever drop at all in any significant manner of correction.
I know however that somebody like you wouldn’t believe in a conspiracy of epic proportions where the Federal Reserve practically rigs and controls the entire United States economy.
If you want to run the United States economy like the Soviet Union where the markets are rigged all the time this what we get. The Soviets had their fair share of timely intentional glitches also in the 80’s right up to their eventual collapse.
You’re like an idealistic child who thinks that there are places in the world where corruption doesn’t control everything. Dude, when there’s money involved, everyone is trying to manipulate the situation. It doesn’t follow from that that the economy will collapse.
No, I’m just a guy that likes calling a spade, a spade when everybody else likes calling it something else.
Extra post.
So you’re just a guy who likes to tell the truth when everyone else is wrong? What does that have to do with the reasoning above about the economy? I mean, I get the need to self aggrandize and all that, but I mean…facts much?
I’ve posted ongoing factual economic data in this thread but every time you want to discuss the issue of the economic environment within the United States you want to stick with standardized propaganda talking points.
I mean, what else is there to discuss between us on the subject?
You’re making money investing in the stock market where everything is just great as you take your daily dose of government propagandist talking points. Whatever…I get it.
This plugin is not supported by my android phone. I politely demand you to post content that remains unbiased to smaller parts of technology. My phone is feeling left out.
Hmm, not sure how I could be more accommodating. 
Welcome back.
HHH,
“Love Is Going To Save Us” is what I’m talking about! Thanks for the auditory orgasm! 
What time is it? Presently, time to rave!