Trump enters the stage

Trump told reporters at a White House news conference.

Trump’s extraordinary comments come as several defense officials tell CNN relations between the President and Pentagon leadership are becoming increasingly strained.

They also followed efforts by Trump to convince the public that he had not made a series of reported disparaging remarks about US military personnel and veterans, which were first reported by The Atlantic magazine.

Trump referred to Marines buried at cemetery in France in crude and derogatory terms, a former senior official says

A former senior administration official confirmed to CNN that Trump referred to fallen US service members at the Aisne-Marne cemetery in crude and derogatory terms during a November 2018 trip to France to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the end of World War I. Other outlets, including Fox News, have confirmed much of The Atlantic’s reporting, which Trump and the White House vehemently deny.

Some have expressed concern that the President’s Monday accusations against the military’s top brass could have a corrosive effect.

“The President’s comments about the motivations of military leaders not only demeans their service and that of those they lead; he lends credence to the very disdain and thoughtlessness he tries to deny,” retired US Navy Rear Admiral and CNN analyst John Kirby said.

The Pentagon did not respond to a request for comment on Monday’s remarks.

White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows appeared to attempt to walk back Trump’s comments during an interview with Fox Business on Tuesday, saying the President’s accusations against the “top people at the Pentagon” were not directed specifically at people like Secretary of Defense Mark Esper or the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley.

“Those comments are not directed specifically at them as much as it is what we all know happens in Washington, DC,” Meadows said, saying “That comment was more directed about the military industrial complex.”

While Trump has publicly disparaged the service of several high-profile veterans such as the late Sen. John McCain and his former Secretary of Defense, retired Gen. Jim Mattis, Monday’s broadside was on a new level targeting leaders he appointed to carry out his orders.

Trump has also repeatedly touted boosting the defense budget as one of his administration’s major accomplishments, citing it as evidence of his support for the military, spending that has also benefited defense contractors.

Top commanders exhausted and worried

CNN has previously reported that relations between Trump and Esper are tense, with Trump believed to be on the verge of replacing him. But, less than two months from the presidential election, the Pentagon’s top commanders are growing increasingly exhausted and worried about their relationship with the President, several defense officials tell CNN.

A critical area of concern is how the Pentagon would respond if Trump invokes the Insurrection Act to put US military troops on the streets to deal with civilian protestors as he continues to stoke divisions across the country in the run up to the election. Trump floated the idea last month and, after he first made the threat in June, Esper publicly broke with him by saying he opposed any such move.

To avoid a new showdown with the White House, for the last several weeks, top military officials – including Milley – have been getting regular briefings on civil unrest in major cities across the country. The idea is to be ready with alternative plans for state-activated National Guard and other federal civilian law enforcement rather than have active duty troops potentially clash with protesters, according to several defense officials.

Another issue that could lead to a clash between Trump and military leadership is the $740 billion defense bill that would strip the names of Confederate generals in the face of vocal opposition from Trump who said he’d veto any move.

The entire Joint Chiefs have made it clear they want to eliminate what they see as the divisive symbols of the Confederacy.

Milley did not hold back on the issue in appearance before Congress in July, stating that “those officers turned their back on their oath,” referring to the names on the bases. “It was an act of treason, at the time, against the Union, against the Stars and Stripes, against the US Constitution.”

Military leadership have embarked on several initiatives aimed at improving racial inclusion. Officials say it is vital work to ensure that when troops go to war, they are a cohesive fighting force.

There are also very real concerns about the aftermath of November’s election, particularly if the result is not immediately clear after election night.

Last month Milley told members of Congress that the military will not play a role in the election and won’t help settle any disputes if the results are contested.

“In the event of a dispute over some aspect of the elections, by law U.S. courts and the U.S. Congress are required to resolve any disputes, not the U.S. Military,” Milley wrote in a letter to the House Armed services committee.

Top US general tells Congress the military won’t play a role in the 2020 election

“I believe deeply in the principle of an apolitical U.S. military,” Milley wrote.

Despite what Milley stated, should there be some kind of constitutional crisis if the election result is unclear, the military could well be put in a tricky position especially as Trump’s opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden, floated the idea they might become involved in an interview in June.

“I promise you, I’m absolutely convinced they will escort him from the White House with great dispatch,” Biden said, referring to the US military’s Joint Chiefs of Staff.

On top of that uncertainty there are concerns Trump may launch military action against an adversary before Inauguration Day, regardless of who wins the White House are also front and center for the top brass.

© 2020 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

{The pent up power grab needs release. There are ominous signs, that the accumulated powers can not be rationally grounded, or discharged.} -meno

········ …

M.Cohen Trump attorney says:

Cohen says Trump ‘actually looking to change the Constitution’
In an interview with CNN’s Don Lemon, former Trump personal attorney Michael Cohen claimed that if President Trump were to win reelection, he would start looking for ways to “change the Constitution” so he could be elected to a third term. Source: CNN

youtu.be/xLzQRJ5Uo7M

The Guardian - Back to home

Fox News broadcast an interview on Saturday night in which Donald Trump without any evidence accused Joe Biden of taking drugs to get him through debates.

Trump ally who sought to change CDC Covid reports claims he was fighting ‘deep state’

“I think there’s probably – possibly – drugs involved,” Trump told Jeanine Pirro. “That’s what I hear. I mean, there’s possibly drugs. I don’t know how you can go from being so bad where you can’t even get out a sentence … ”

Trump did not finish his own sentence, but he went on to say he was referring to the Democratic presidential nominee’s hesitant performances in early primary debates, before his surge to victory on the back of a win in South Carolina.

“You saw some of those debates with the large number of people on the stage,” Trump said. “He was, I mean, I used to say, ‘How is it possible that he can go forward?”

According to the president, Biden won the nomination because the progressive vote was split.

“And he only won because Elizabeth Warren didn’t drop out,” he said. “Had she dropped out Bernie [Sanders] would’ve won Super Tuesday, every state, and you would’ve had Bernie instead of Biden.”

Trump’s claim came not long after his oldest son, Donald Trump Jr, denied claims he used cocaine before speaking at the Republican convention. Remarkably enough, it was also not the first time Trump, 74, has accused Biden, 77, of taking drugs. Speaking to the Washington Examiner last month, the president said: “We’re going to call for a drug test, by the way, because his best performance was against Bernie [in the final debate] … It wasn’t that he was Winston Churchill because he wasn’t, but it was a normal, boring debate. You know, nothing amazing happened. And we are going to call for a drug test because there’s no way – you can’t do that.”

In the Fox interview broadcast told Fox News he would happily “put down very quickly” any leftwing protests. “Look, it’s called insurrection. We just send in and we, we do it very easy. I mean, it’s very easy. I’d rather not do that, because there’s no reason for it, but if we had to, we’d do that and put it down within minutes, within minutes.”

Trump has sent federal agents to confront protesters, most prominently in Portland. In the Fox interview Trump said it was “retribution” when US Marshals shot dead a suspect in the Portland killing of a member of a rightwing group.

Trump attacks Robert Mueller’s ‘hit squad’ in row over ‘wiped’ phones

Trump and Biden are due to debate in Cleveland on 29 September, in Miami on 15 October and in Nashville on 22 October. The vice-presidential nominees Mike Pence and Kamala Harris will meet in Salt Lake City on 7 October.

Trump is famously teetotal and disapproving of drug use but his political rise has been fueled by a well-documented love for Diet Coke and junk food. Beset by speculation about his physical and cognitive health, earlier this month the president was moved to deny rumours that a “series of ministrokes” prompted a short-notice visit to hospital in Washington last November.

© 2020 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.

On drugs

If religion is the opium of the people, and merely a dependency, should not that dependency be instituted if this people do not cohese in maintaining institutional society?

Otherwise, Hegel’s ideals can not be said to be upended!?!

<<>>>>>><<<<<>>>>>>><<<<<<<>>>>>>

China Syndrome

America’s China syndrome

As the US presidential election nears, Democrats and Republicans have defined their stances towards Beijing. Sadly for Europe, says Hanns W. Maull, they won’t find a common position.

A new cold war or not – the relationship between America and China is on a downward spiral and the list of contentious issues is getting longer almost by the day. As the US presidential election approaches, Washington has been upping the ante, with leading members of Donald Trump’s team publicly targeting the Chinese Communist Party’s ideology, its habits of gathering intelligence by means fair and foul, and its economic policies. As Bill Barr, the US Attorney General put it in a speech: “The ultimate ambition of China’s rulers isn’t to trade with the United States. It is to raid the United States.”

China is playing an important role in the battle for the next presidency and Congress. In the Democratic Party draft election manifesto, China gets 18 mentions, as opposed to seven in 2016, when Hilary Clinton ran for president. Her platform talked about “managing China’s rise” and pressing it to “play by the rules”, while Joe Biden’s is now all for “pushing back” against Beijing. Even in the light of significant continuity, like a call for “a fair system” for global trade, it is a strong signal of how the power equation has shifted in China’s favour.

Democrats warn against a new cold war with China

The Democrats’ platform warns against a new cold war and pledges not to avoid “self-defeating unilateral tariff wars” with China. Yet their strategy does show considerable similarities with the original US containment strategy in the face of the Soviet Union in the late 1940s. Its key elements are to push back “where we have profound economic, security, and human rights concerns about the actions of China’s government”, to cooperate where possible, and to control the risks of confrontation, for example, through arms control.

This also sounds like the European Union’s take on China as “a partner, a competitor and a systemic rival”. Like the Europeans, deemed “natural partners”, the Democrats argue for a comprehensive response, covering economics, military security, and politics. A Biden administration would tackle economic imbalances and China’s unfair trading practices and hold China responsible for its contributions to global warming. It would rely on nuclear deterrence and a robust military posture and challenge China to uphold human rights and democracy.

Biden and the Democratic Party have set out a coherent and comprehensive – if somewhat jaded – grand strategy to restore America’s standing in the world and meet China’s challenge. Trump and the Republicans have not. The Trump team’s recent attacks on China betray the shrill and hysterical edge of an administration caught on the wrong foot by Beijing. America is in bad shape and 72 percent of Americans believe “the country is on the wrong track”. Trump and his Republicans could lose the election, possibly by a landslide, and their call to arms against China is, on the one hand, a desperate attempt to turn the tide.

Trump’s team calls for a crusade against China’s “tyranny”

On the other hand, it is more than just electioneering. Starting with Vice President Mike Pence in October 2018 and culminating in a recent speech by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Trump’s current team has called for a crusade by the “free world” against China’s “tyranny”. The previous team of former generals – then Secretary of Defense James Mattis, National Security Adviser H.R. MacMasters and Chief of Staff John Kelly – was relentlessly realist in comparison: America was to preserve peace through strength with allies and partners that “magnify our power.” Pompeo prefers to remain vague about alliances.

Clearly, Trump and his team do not think much of traditional allies and have little faith in dialogue with China. Instead, they appear to view US business as a good partner for their crusade. They have named and shamed American companies that have allegedly cow-towed to Beijing and described business leaders as targets of – and even pawns in – Chinese influence operations. Offering inducements and hinting at punishment for companies that won’t join the crusade, Barr has said he wants “public and private sectors […] to work together [… ] to win the contest for the commanding heights of the global economy.”

Whoever takes office in the White House will need to face China’s challenge to US leadership

Yet such an alliance is unlikely. Despite misgivings, American business has benefitted hugely from engaging with China and shows little interest in cutting back. An even bigger problem for Trump is his lack of credibility as the champion of the “free world”. His administration has failed its allies and undermined American democracy. Trump has routinely broken his oath of office, torn down much of the American diplomatic machine, and destroyed any vestige of consistency – he himself undermined the crusade against China by applauding Xi’s policies in Xinjiang and Hong Kong and allegedly begging him to support his re-election.

But whoever takes office in the White House in January 2021 will continue to struggle with the gauntlet China has thrown down in a challenge to America’s global leadership. Will Americans rally around their flag to defend their country’s traditional international role? Don’t hold your breath. Some old and new cold warriors would like China to become the common enemy to unite a desperately divided America. But that simply won’t happen. Trump and his Republican followers cannot and will not work with the Democrats – not even on China. That is bad news for Europeans, who will no longer be able to count on US leadership in an ever more tense world. Europeans will have look out for themselves.

© Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS) gGmbH. 2020

Trump suggests he would ‘negotiate’ a third term as president because he is ‘probably entitled’ to it

Sep 13, 2020, 10:55 AM

President Donald Trump on Saturday once more suggested he would spend three terms — 12 years — in office, claiming that he was “probably entitled” to an extra term in office.

Throughout his presidency, Trump has sometimes suggested he would spend more than two terms in office.

The 22nd Amendment, which was ratified in 1951, established that a president may not serve more than two terms.

Prior to the ratification of the 22nd Amendment, FDR was elected to serve four terms in office, serving 12 years as president before his death in 1945.

Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

President Donald Trump on Saturday once again suggested interest in serving three terms in office, claiming that he was “probably entitled” to an additional four years following a hypothetical second term at a campaign event in Nevada.

“And 52 days from now we’re going to win Nevada, and we’re gonna win four more years in the White House,” Trump told the mostly maskless, non-socially distant crowd of his supporters on Saturday. “And then after that, we’ll negotiate, right? Because we’re probably — based on the way we were treated — we are probably entitled to another four after that.”

Trump has often claimed he has been treated unfairly in comparison to his predecessors, often times pointing to the Russian election interference probe and his impeachment. Throughout his first term as president, Trump has also frequently floated the idea that he will attempt to serve more than two terms in office.

In August, at a rally in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, the president similarly suggested he was owed a third presidential term.

“We are going to win four more years,” Trump said last month, according to Yahoo News. “And then after that, we’ll go for another four years because they spied on my campaign. We should get a redo of four years.”

In November 2018, Trump told Fox News’ Chris Wallace that he would not seek a constitutional amendment to permit him to serve more than two terms in office. He made the clarification after he had praised Chinese President Xi Jinping’s abolishment of presidential term limits.

“He’s now president for life. President for life. No, he’s great.” Trump said in March 2018. “And look, he was able to do that. I think it’s great. Maybe we’ll have to give that a shot someday.”

“I think the eight-year limit is a good thing, not a bad thing,” Trump later told Wallace in 2018, although he has continued to suggest he would seek a third term in the time that has followed.

In June 2019, Trump told “Meet the Press” moderator Chuck Todd that he is only joking when he says he will try to serve more than two terms as president.

Presidents George Washington and Thomas Jefferson established an unofficial two-term limit, although President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected to the office four times, in 1932, 1936, 1940, and 1944, serving 12 years as president before his death, as History.com noted. In February 1951, the 22nd Amendment was ratified, limiting American presidents to serving two terms in office.

  • Copyright © 2020 Insider Inc. All rights reserved.

Trump said:

“Democrats are “heartless”. They don’t want to give STIMULUS PAYMENTS to people who desperately need the money, and whose fault it was NOT that the plague came in from China. Go for the much higher numbers, Republicans, it all comes back to the USA anyway (one way or another!).
8:30 AM · Sep 16, 2020”

youtu.be/7iAXdJYEf1E

Lol…

Don’t go to work/go to work? you can’t have it both ways, but the political trolls think they can.

Lockdown = not soon enough / lockdown = damaging to society… the contradiction is staggeringly blatant.

Do you think there’d have been a lot less deaths, if there was a lockdown during the Black Death?

MagsJ:

The uncertAinty revolved around religious themes, therefore moral issues may have been a lot more determinative., in or out of the home, or even in their own space -room.

I think it is very difficult one way or another. , the real state at that general level. Try to figure the literacy BC than may give some glimmer.

On the other hand, there is some credibility in the idea that another possible resurgence may cause nead irreparable economic damage, do You agree?

I d I not know much about the plague , though, other then it too, may have caused the Parisian rats’ infestation, coming from established Chinese trade routes.

You didn’t answer the question… in that “Do you think there’d have been a lot less deaths, if there was a lockdown during the Black Death”?

Lockdown should have been sooner V lockdown has been detrimental to society and the economy. Which is it to be? You can only choose one.

You didn’t answer the question… in that “Do you think there’d have been a lot less deaths, if there was a lockdown during the Black Death”?

Lockdown should have been sooner V lockdown has been detrimental to society and the economy. Which is it to be? You can only choose one.[/quit

An either/ or question may not necessitate an either/ or answer.

I personally think it is possible that if more people stayed home there would have been less infections. If people go out , and if they come into contact with infected people, UT is much more probable than not that infections will occur.

But then if they will definitely lock themselves into a a non interactive situation, the will lessen thsif chances for infection

But in this case, the plague took half of Europe’s population. therefore they did interact, despite, the presumption that theu understood the consequences.

So I definitely believe that they should have flied upon their gut level feelings, fathead than their faith on religious convictions.

So my curt answer is , yes., had it then been a question devoid of religious reliance. That being the case, the question is muted by a reductive assumption further down this line on impenetrable variences: that such choice back then e as overly reductive and effected not to offend equal shares if yes and/ or no.

The criteria of this challenge gives little justice to assert a current belief which caddies equal weight to belief in what could have given rise to facilitate a fair assessment of my own particular non-religious belief.

Is a storm brewing by a strongman to overcome democracy, out of fear?

Do finally Rousseau’s splendid savage be replaced by fearful cult system devoid of any feelings other than Hobbsian fear of each other?

Will this be the end of something valuable in society that will transform social justice based on trust? And ultimately, will simulation replace this real thong?

"Trump won’t commit to peaceful power transfer, prompting backlash

OPINION

Ignore the strongman fantasies. If Trump loses the election, he’ll lose his job. Period.

Trump’s not-so-veiled threats to overstay his Oval Office welcome are signs of weakness, not strength. The presidency is his shield against prosecution.

Do I think President Donald Trump will refuse to leave office if he loses the election? No. Do I think he’ll be able to wield his powers to prevent a legitimate result? No. Do I think he loves musing about sticking around no matter what? Absolutely. And that’s one of the many reasons we must stop giving him openings to weave fantasies, and stop the mass freakouts that routinely ensue.

Trump’s president-for-life schtick serves him in many ways. Just look at the attention he’s gotten from his answers to questions this week about whether he’d commit to a peaceful transition of power (“Well, we’re going to have to see what happens”) and whether the results are only legitimate if he wins (“We want to make sure the election is honest, and I’m not sure that it can be”).

Has any other president ever been asked questions like this, and would any other president have answered this way? Both are unimaginable.

Trying to avoid legal reckonings

But Trump loves to sow doubt and handwringing, and this is the kind of own-the-libs red meat that fuels his base. He, and they, revel in his role as a faux iconoclast. They must know that he’s a rich man’s son, a (possibly) rich Ivy League graduate himself, who hangs out with millionaires at his own Mar-A-Lago resort and, CBS News reported, told them after he signed 2017 tax cuts into law that “you all just got a lot richer.” Trump’s pose as an enemy of the elite is pure fiction, but his fans seem happy to play along.

And that affinity for international strongmen? Those not-so-veiled threats to occupy the Oval Office come what may in the election? These are features of Trump’s appeal, not bugs. As Bill Clinton memorably put it in 2002, “When people feel uncertain, they’d rather have somebody that’s strong and wrong than somebody who’s weak and right.”

In fact, Trump’s supposed strength arises from weakness. He is trying desperately to postpone his long-delayed season of reckoning. Who would doubt he’d happily depart the deflector shield of the White House to run Trump TV or some other Trump-centric media venture if he did not fear prosecution and, possibly, prison?

The tragic deference shown by special counsel Robert Mueller and the Republican senators he counted on to hold Trump accountable has brought us to this pass. It’s only logical for Trump to see the presidency as his best hope for avoiding consequences and the long arm of New York legal authorities.

Backed up by his helpful Justice Department and other allies, Trump is speeding up the tempo of his attacks on the U.S. democratic process, planting falsehoods and sowing suspicions about mail ballots, fraud, foreign interference and the legitimacy of votes counted after Election Day.

He’s also escalating — not just raising public doubts about whether he’ll accept the election results but, according to The Atlantic, laying plans to keep those results in limbo until crucial deadlines pass, chaos reigns, Inauguration Day dawns Jan. 20 and, well, possession being nine-tenths of the law and all …

Crushing democracy: Trump has a plan to steal the election and it’s not clear Democrats have a plan to stop him

Progressive strategist Anat Shenker-Osorio, host of the “Words to Win By” podcast, put it simply in a messaging guide for Democrats: “Trump knows he can’t win so he’s trying to cheat.”

Nothing has stopped Trump yet. Not even a Congress presented with enough evidence weekly to impeach him many times over.

Voters will determine Trump’s fate

But many of the Republicans who ignored Trump’s blatantly impeachable acts and kept him in office are now saying America will have a peaceful transfer of power — that nothing can stop it, not even Trump. A unanimous Senate reinforced the message Thursday by passing a resolution committing to a peaceful transfer.

There are also signs the sleeping giant of the U.S. military has awoken and is on alert. Washington Post columnist David Ignatius reported last week that the U.S. Cyber Command has taken proactive steps it says will make it impossible for Russia or anyone else to disrupt voting systems in the states.

Rational fears: A Donald Trump coup if he loses in 2020? With all the norms he’s busted, don’t rule it out

And there is no indication the U.S. military is prepared to allow a Trump coup. In fact many see him as a danger. A bipartisan group of nearly 500 retired generals, admirals and national security officials — including retired Air Force Gen. Paul Selva, who until last year was the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under Trump — endorsed Democrat Joe Biden on Thursday. They called Trump “not equal to the enormous responsibilities of his office” and the challenges of dealing with “a world on fire.”

In reality, Trump is swinging his metaphorical bat not at America’s elite but at its democracy and institutions, from the FBI, CIA and military, to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, to the ballots and elections that will determine his fate.

And determine it they will. "

© Copyright Gannett 2020

&&&&&&&& &&&& &&&&___

Trump set to name Supreme Court pick as he sows fears of election chaos

Analysis by Maeve Reston, CNN
Updated 9:38 AM EDT, Sat September 26, 2020

(CNN)As President Donald Trump continues to sow doubt and uncertainty about the election, he’s set to announce his third Supreme Court nominee in the Rose Garden Saturday, the capstone of the promise he made four years ago to name a long line of conservative judges who will reshape the courts for generations.

“We have tremendous unity in the party,” Trump said of his Supreme Court pick during a campaign rally in Newport News, Virginia, on Friday night, adding that getting his nominee confirmed would be a “great victory” ahead of November 3. “They say the biggest thing you can do (as president) is the appointment of judges, but especially the appointment of Supreme Court justices. That’s the single biggest thing a president can do, because it sets the tone of the country for 40 years, 50 years.”

The President’s expected choice of Amy Coney Barrett, 48, a federal appellate judge and Notre Dame professor who was a law clerk for the late Justice Antonin Scalia in the late 1990s, would further shift the balance of the court to the right, potentially ahead of a consequential case on health care that will be heard a week after Election Day.

Barrett’s views on Second Amendment gun rights, immigration and abortion

Barrett’s expected nomination – just one week after the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg – would inject another polarizing and unpredictable dynamic into the presidential race at a time of great anxiety for Americans.

Trump foments mistrust of election he claims won't be honest
Trump foments mistrust of election he claims won’t be honest
Trump this week tried to keep the public’s attention away from the coronavirus pandemic as the number of cases ticked past 7 million and Americans grappled with an unshakable sense of economic uncertainty.

But in the lead up to his nomination announcement, Trump has only managed to create more anxiety. His refusal to commit to a peaceful transfer of power raised the specter that America will be transformed into a “banana republic” in November if Democratic nominee Joe Biden wins. The President contradicted his own FBI director by arguing that the election is rife with fraud and rigged against him, even though there is no evidence to support that conspiracy theory.

Trump also continued his war on science by undercutting his own medical advisers on the timeline for a vaccine and by suggesting that officials at the Food and Drug Administration might have political motivations if they take additional time to evaluate the safety of a vaccine. (The FDA declined comment on the President’s statement, but FDA Commissioner Dr. Stephen Hahn has said the “FDA will not authorize or approve a vaccine that we would not feel comfortable giving to our families.”)

A consequential pick for the high court
While he was stirring more chaos, Ginsburg’s death created another welcome distraction for Trump – a chance to remind conservatives, some of whom may have soured on the President during the pandemic, the redeeming power of a Trump White House: his appointment of an unprecedented number of federal judges in his first term.

At the same time, it is difficult to decipher the effect that the high court pick will have on the presidential race, because the anger about Republicans’ rush to confirm a replacement for Ginsburg has also electrified Democrats and led to a flood of donations to progressive groups and candidates.

Many Democrats view Trump’s expected choice of Barrett, whom he appointed to the 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals, as a direct rebuke to the legacy of Ginsburg, a liberal icon and staunch defender of abortion rights.

Based on Barrett’s judicial philosophy and her past writings, Democrats have argued this week that if she is named to the court – solidifying a 6-3 conservative majority – she will likely have a hand in rolling back abortion rights and striking down the Affordable Care Act.

The Supreme Court plans to hear oral arguments one week after the election on the future of the Affordable Care Act. A group of Republican state attorneys general and the Trump administration have argued that the law’s individual mandate is unconstitutional and there are legal grounds for striking down the law in its entirety.

“What matters most is that health care is on the ballot and is in front of the Supreme Court,” Delaware Sen. Chris Coons, a Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, noting that the health care law protects those seeking health insurance from discrimination based on pre-existing conditions – which will now include health complications for those who contracted Covid-19.

“We know that Judge Barrett has made statements disparaging the Affordable Care Act, disparaging the decision that upheld the Affordable Care Act,” Coons said during an interview on “The Situation Room” Friday evening, “and I think this is a significant concern for millions of average Americans in the middle of a pandemic that doesn’t seem to be going away any time soon.”

But Republican senators and activists who have defended Barrett, the mother of seven children, have accused Democrats of targeting her because of her Catholic faith. Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein angered Barrett’s supporters in 2017 when she challenged Barrett during her confirmation hearings for her seat on the 7th Circuit by alluding to her faith and stating that the “dogma lives loudly within you.”

Barrett met with Trump earlier this week and was widely viewed as one of his top contenders for the Supreme Court vacancy in 2018, when Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement. The President ultimately chose Brett Kavanaugh as Kennedy’s replacement.

Republicans have signaled plans for a quick Supreme Court confirmation process. Here’s when it could happen.
As part of their strategy in the upcoming confirmation hearings, Democrats plan to ask Trump’s nominee to recuse herself from any case involving the presidential election results, given that the President will have just named her to a lifetime appointment.

They plan to use the President’s words against him – noting that he has justified his brisk push to replace Ginsburg on the court by stating he wants to avoid a 4-4 tie on the Supreme Court if election disputes arise.

Trump’s attacks on democracy
After the President refused to commit to a peaceful transfer of power this week, he continued to insist that the presidential election is “rigged” and that mail-in ballots are a “scam.”

Trump and his allies seized on reports about an incident in Pennsylvania, where nine ballots were improperly discarded, to further sow unfounded distrust in the election and falsely claim that Democrats are “trying to steal the election.”

Fact-check: Team Trump capitalizes on Pennsylvania ballot incident to baselessly accuse Democrats of ‘stealing’ the election
But speaking under oath to the Senate Homeland Security Committee on Thursday, FBI Director Christopher Wray undercut Trump’s arguments of election fraud by stating, “We have not seen, historically, any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election, whether it’s by mail or otherwise.”

That statement drew a swift rebuke from Trump’s chief of staff Mark Meadows, who disputed Wray’s assertion during an appearance on “CBS This Morning” on Friday.

“With all due respect to Director Wray, he has a hard time finding emails in his own FBI, let alone figuring out whether there’s any kind of voter fraud,” Meadows said. “This is a very different case. The rules are being changed.”

“Perhaps he needs to get involved on the ground and he would change his testimony on Capitol Hill,” Meadows added.

Later on Friday, during his rally in Newport News, Trump said he wanted to see “a smooth beautiful transition” after the election – but only if it’s an “honest vote,” he said, reiterating debunked claims about unsolicited ballots.

“We’re not going to lose this except if they cheat, that’s the way I look at it,” Trump said, repeating baseless claims about “mischief” – now a cornerstone of his stump speech – meant to sow more distrust in an election that polls currently show him losing.

A list of the times Trump has said he won’t accept the election results or leave office if he loses
One Democrat who seemed unfazed by Trump’s refusal to unequivocally commit to a peaceful transfer of power was Biden, who said Friday the American people “aren’t going to be shut down in this election.”

“This is a typical Trump distraction, trying to make everybody wonder whether or not the election will be legit and whether or not absentee ballots matter while he is writing his absentee ballot out,” Biden told MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle.

“Every vote in this country is going to be heard and they will not be stopped. I’m confident that all of the irresponsible, outrageous attacks on voting, we’ll have an election in this country as we always have had. And he’ll leave.”

View on CNN
© 2020 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

"A VOYAGE THROUGH RAGE, PLEASURE, AND TRANSCENDENCE

JURISPRUDENCE

Trump Kept the Quiet Part Quiet About Amy Coney Barrett

The president introduced his Supreme Court pick—but stayed mum about the real reason he needs her.

By DAHLIA LITHWICK

SEPT 26, 20207:48 PM

He didn’t have to say it out loud.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

President Donald Trump nominated federal appeals court judge Amy Coney Barrett to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Supreme Court seat on Saturday in Washington, where—as Barrett noted in her remarks—flags around the capital still fly at half-mast, because Ginsburg has not yet been buried.

The reason the plan to fill Ginsburg’s seat was announced the same night as her death was never a mystery: The president explained several times over the last week that the new justice’s nomination and confirmation needed to happen in the same amount of time Barack Obama allowed the nation to mourn before even naming a replacement for Justice Antonin Scalia in 2016 because Trump needs her to weigh in on any election-related controversy on his behalf. As he put it to reporters on Monday: “We need nine justices,” he said. “You need that. With the unsolicited millions of ballots that they’re sending.” He explained that because of his (farcical, proofless) claim that mail-in ballots will be a source of rampant fraud, this ninth justice must be seated before an election challenge is mounted. That pronouncement came just prior to his claim that he could not commit to a peaceful transfer of power should he lose the election. Again: The reason a ninth justice is needed to be seated in advance of the election in which voting is already taking place is to decide whatever lawsuit is coming in his favor. Perhaps unsurprisingly, then, on Saturday Trump did not overtly ask Barrett to rule in his favor next month while detailing her biography on the White House lawn.

Trump has similarly announced on multiple occasions that he needs this vacant seat filled because Roe v. Wade cannot be allowed to stand and that any nominee of his would “automatically” overturn it. Indeed, several GOP senators are on the record saying they would refuse to vote for Judge Barrett unless she openly promises to do so. It’s a problem. A Pew poll from last year found that seven in 10 oppose seeing Roe overturned. Other polls suggest the margins are far higher. Barrett has written about her belief that stare decisis need not constrain judicial decision-making. It is thus unsurprising that Trump also did not bring up his promises about overturning Roe as he introduced Barrett in the Rose Garden.

Trump has also explicitly said that he wants the Supreme Court to overturn the Affordable Care Act and its protections for patients with preexisting conditions, which his Justice Department will actually argue in a case to be heard immediately in the wake of the election. If Barrett agrees with him, as many as 25 million people will lose their health insurance in the midst of a pandemic that is—if science is to be believed—not under control. Barrett wrote very critically of John Roberts’ vote upholding the ACA in 2012, saying in 2017 “Chief Justice Roberts pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning to save the statute.” Polling from before the pandemic revealed that 55 percent of Americans support the ACA. So it is also unsurprising that nobody mentioned ending health care during the ceremony, either.

In her own remarks, Barrett said nothing objectionable, and her celebration of Ginsburg as someone who unfailingly worked across the aisle was deeply affecting. But working across the aisle is no longer fashionable, and this same Judge Barrett argued in 2016 that Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court was somehow to be viewed through the lens of raw partisan power: “We’re talking about him being replaced by someone who could dramatically flip the balance of power on the court. It’s not a lateral move.” But the fact that the voters should be allowed to select the nominee in 2016, and the voters—many of whom have already cast ballots—should not be allowed to select the nominee in 2020 (despite polls showing that most voters do not want a justice seated before the election) is also something that nobody mentioned in the Rose Garden either. It would seem that “dramatically flipping the balance of power at the court” is just different when Republicans do it.

Trump forget to mention, in his tribute to an “independent judiciary” on Saturday, that he has devoted his presidency to bullying and insulting any judge who has ruled independently from him, and also that it’s very hard to say that your judicial nominee is independent when you have already tied her to striking down reproductive rights and access to affordable health care and to interceding in your upcoming vote-fraud claims in any election litigation. He did mention three other areas in which Barrett will support his view of constitutional freedom: broader gun rights, broader religious liberty rights, and a commitment to greater “public safety.” On these promises too, the judge’s record is clear.

The reason the president forgot to mention that (a) his judges cannot be permitted to be independent; and (b) that his judges tend to be wildly out of step with public opinion on so many of the topics he holds dear is that it would highlight what minority rule looks like, and why he cannot, in fact “let the people” decide with their votes in his upcoming election. A court determined to impose minority rule is in fact the playbook. It benefits big business, it benefits secret donors with considerable war chests, it benefits white supremacy, and it benefits Trump’s trailing electoral campaign. Quite simply, locking in the power of a minority through the courts is the political project of Trump and the Republican Senators who are equally eager to jam this nominee through before the election.

As has been noted many times over this past week, the GOP has lost the popular vote in six of the last seven elections and yet appointed 15 out of the last 19 justices. Barrett would make that 16 out of 20 seats. And that is why the people most assuredly cannot be allowed to decide the future of reproductive freedom, the future of health care, or even whether and how their own ballots will be counted in just over a month. Trump cannot talk about those things because they will further harm his own polling and will also reflect badly on GOP senators who pledged to vote for the nominee before they even knew whom she would be. They cannot talk about those things because minority rule doesn’t poll as well in the U.S. as it does in, say, Hungary or medieval France. But minority rule is on the ballot. It may well be the only thing on the ballot. Because if, as the president promises, his independent justice needs to be seated to decide whose ballots count, this isn’t merely a commitment to entrench unpopular, dangerous, and partisan policies into constitutional law. It’s also a commitment to commandeering the high court itself into deciding whether and how to count votes, in an election in which a sitting president has already pledged that only some voters will be allowed to pick the winner. "

Slate is published by The Slate Group, a Graham Holdings Company.
All contents © 2020 The Slate Group LLC. All rights reserved.

Psychiatric evaluations- credible? Or a manageable genius more fitting?

youtu.be/0B4nS1-ScYw

youtu.be/BrQ-AzEheuM

 >>>>>>

youtu.be/Fr3hhrpFULc

Say what? ( even after 4 years)

Now dont You feel for a party which tries to retain self esteem - Das Sein, from a legislative agenda due to discredit all the supposedly invariable points, that have been lost do to human cognitive failure to recollect how America once was?

Wouldn’t anyone would wish to recover a paradise lost, through genetic engineering?

Of course they would, and blame AI for an insistent reminder of a superior memory

Can that deflect anh realization bag AI to compensate for lagged clichés, such as , well, in that case, let them eat cake?

Now this:

youtu.be/x4dpn0b2KJo

The New York Times

Tracing Trump’s Contacts

Treatment Implications

Timeline of Symptoms

The White House Physician

Use of Dexamethasone to Treat Trump Suggests Severe Covid-19, Experts Say

Many of the measures cited by his doctors are reserved for patients severely affected by the coronavirus.

President Trump arrived on Friday at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., for treatment of Covid-19.

Published Oct. 4, 2020Updated Oct. 5, 2020, 6:51 a.m. ET

President Trump’s doctors offered rosy assessments of his condition on Sunday, but the few medical details they disclosed — including his fluctuating oxygen levels and a decision to begin treatment with a steroid drug — suggested to many infectious disease experts that he is suffering a more severe case of Covid-19 than the physicians acknowledged.

In photos and videos released by the White House, there is hardly any sign that Mr. Trump is sick. But at a news conference at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., Mr. Trump’s doctors said his oxygen levels had dropped to a level that can indicate that a patient’s lungs are compromised. The symptom is seen in many patients with severe Covid-19.

The president’s medical team also said that he had been prescribed dexamethasone on Saturday. The drug is a steroid used to head off an immune system overreaction that kills many Covid-19 patients.

The drug is reserved for those with severe illness, because it has not been shown to benefit those with milder forms of the disease and may even be risky.

Because of the incomplete picture offered by the president’s doctors, it was not clear whether they had given him dexamethasone too quickly, or whether the president was far sicker than has been publicly acknowledged, experts in infectious disease and emergency medicine said on Sunday.

“The dexamethasone is the most mystifying of the drugs we’re seeing him being given at this point,” said Dr. Thomas McGinn, physician-in-chief at Northwell Health, the largest health care provider in New York State. The drug is normally not used unless the patient’s condition seems to be deteriorating, he added.

“Suddenly, they’re throwing the kitchen sink at him,” Dr. McGinn said. “It raises the question: Is he sicker than we’re hearing, or are they being overly aggressive because he is the president, in a way that could be potentially harmful?”

Dr. Esther Choo, a professor of emergency medicine at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, said of the doctors’ statements on Sunday: “This is no longer aspirationally positive. And it’s much more than just an ‘abundance of caution’ kind of thing.”

A Timeline of Trump’s Symptoms and Treatments

Oct. 4, 2020

Some experts raised an additional possibility: that the president is directing his own care, and demanding intense treatment despite risks he may not fully understand. The pattern even has a name: V.I.P. syndrome, which describes prominent figures who receive poor medical care because doctors are too zealous in treating them — or defer too readily to their instructions.

“You think you’re helping,” said Dr. Céline Gounder, a clinical assistant professor of medicine and infectious diseases at the N.Y.U. Grossman School of Medicine. “But this is really a data-free zone, and you just don’t know that.”

Still, based on the doctors’ account, Mr. Trump’s symptoms appear to have rapidly progressed since he announced early Friday morning that he had tested positive for the coronavirus.

Mr. Trump had a “high fever” on Friday, and there were two occasions when his blood oxygen levels dropped, his doctors said — on Friday and again on Saturday. The president’s oxygen saturation level was 93 percent at one point, his doctors said, below the 95 percent that is considered the lower limit of the normal range.

Many medical experts consider patients to have severe Covid-19 if their oxygen levels drop below 94 percent. The physicians said M Trump had received supplemental oxygen at the White House on Friday; they were not clear about whether it had been administered again on Saturday, or whether his blood oxygen levels had fallen below 90 at some point.

On Friday, Mr. Trump was given an infusion of an experimental antibody cocktail that is being tested in Covid-19 patients by the drugmaker Regeneron. Mr. Trump is also receiving a five-day course of remdesivir, another experimental drug that is used in hospitalized patients and has been granted emergency authorization by the Food and Drug Administration.

Regeneron’s antibody cocktail is being tested in patients early in the course of the infection, because the treatment fights the virus itself and may prevent it from spreading throughout the body.

Remdesivir is also an antiviral and is already commonly used with dexamethasone, which tamps down the body’s immune response and is given later in the illness, when some patients’ immune systems go into overdrive and attack their vital organs.

On Sunday, the doctors said that Mr. Trump was in good spirits and that he was walking on his own and not complaining of shortness of breath.

“If he continues to look and feel as well as he does today, our hope is to plan for a discharge as early as tomorrow to the White House, where he can continue his treatment,” one of his doctors, Dr. Brian Garibaldi, said at the briefing on Sunday.

But several medical experts said that the decision to prescribe dexamethasone to Mr. Trump did not align with that optimistic scenario.

A large study of dexamethasone in Britain found that the drug helped those who had been sick for more than a week, reducing deaths by one-third among patients on mechanical ventilators and by one-fifth among patients receiving supplemental oxygen by other means.

Guidelines from the World Health Organization recommend that the drug only be given to patients with “severe and critical Covid-19.” The National Institutes of Health has issued similar guidance, specifying that the drug is recommended only for people who require a mechanical ventilator to help them breathe, or who need supplemental oxygen.

“When I think about people needing dexamethasone, I think about people who are escalating their condition, who are heading closer to I.C.U. level than to home,” said Dr. Rochelle Walensky, chief of the division of infectious disease at Massachusetts General Hospital and a professor at Harvard Medical School.

Using multiple drugs at once could have an impact on their effectiveness, and it increases the risk of harmful drug interactions, said Dr. McGinn.

“You’re giving remdesivir, you’re giving dexamethasone, and you’re giving monoclonal antibodies,” he said, referring to the experimental treatment by Regeneron. “No one’s ever done that, not to mention famotidine and some zinc and a mix of cocktails, or whatever else he’s on.”

Uncertainty over the president’s condition stemmed at least in part from earlier mixed signals from the president’s physicians. On Sunday, the team acknowledged delivering an overly positive description of the president’s illness on Saturday.

“I didn’t want to give any information that might steer the course of illness in another direction, and in doing so, you know, it came off that we were trying to hide something, which wasn’t necessarily true,” Dr. Sean P. Conley, the White House physician, said to reporters on Sunday.

Dr. Rajesh Gandhi, an infectious diseases physician at Massachusetts General Hospital and a member of the panel that developed Covid-19 treatment guidelines for the N.I.H, said, “What would be very helpful to know is how much oxygen did the president need and for how long.”
The president’s physicians also have not described in detail the results of imaging scans of Mr. Trump’s lungs, or of blood tests indicating whether he is at risk for blood clots, a common complication in Covid-19 disease.

Mr. Trump is moderately obese, a condition that is usually accompanied by at least mild or moderate hypertension and mild to moderate diabetes, Dr. McGinn noted. The president’s high blood pressure is said to be under control, and he is not known to have Type 2 diabetes. Still, studies have identified the conditions as critical predictors of severe Covid-19 disease.

If Mr. Trump’s illness has significantly progressed, then dexamethasone and remdesivir are appropriate, several doctors said.

“He got the therapies that anybody going into any good hospital in the United States would receive today,” said Dr. Carlos del Rio, a professor of medicine at Emory University in Atlanta.

But the doctors also raised the possibility they might discharge the president as early as Monday, shortly after starting him on the steroid therapy, perplexing some experts.

“If you start somebody on steroids because their oxygen saturations are dropping, then that is the time to be vigilant and to be monitoring somebody more closely,” said Dr. Sam Parnia, an associate professor of critical care medicine at N.Y.U. Langone who has seen many Covid-19 patients.

“If there was a concern that certain things were not available at the White House when his oxygen was a little higher, it probably makes sense to be vigilant now,” Dr. Parnia said.

The fact that Mr. Trump is walking on his own, and that he delivered video statements in which he was able to complete sentences without gasping for breath, was seen as a positive sign by several experts.

Nevertheless, many sick Covid-19 patients appear to be doing well even when their lung function is poor, a condition doctors have nicknamed “happy hypoxia.”

“Of course, we like to see that he is feeling good, but it doesn’t put him in a category that’s essentially mild Covid,” Dr. Choo said.

[Like the Science Times page on Facebook. | Sign up for the Science Times newsletter.]

Steroids may also give a false impression of the patient’s state. The drugs are also known to affect mood, causing euphoria or a general happiness. Steroids can also disrupt sleep, leading to insomnia, irritability or depression.

In some cases they may cause psychiatric effects, leading to feelings of grandiosity and mania, or even delirium and psychosis.

“The thing about steroids is they can have psychiatric side effects at almost any dose,” said Dr. J. Michael Bostwick, a psychiatrist with the Mayo Clinic who authored a paper on the subject.

While steroids are used widely in medicine without much concern about psychotropic effects, “it is necessary to notice if the use of these drugs causes changes in mood or thinking or sleep,” Dr. Bostwick said.

During the first week of Covid-19, the course of disease is unpredictable, Dr. Parnia said. It is never clear whether the illness will progress or plateau. “It can go north, or it can go south,” he said.

Any patient who has experienced low oxygen levels, or hypoxemia, must be closely watched, said Dr. Michelle Prickett, a pulmonary and critical care specialist at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s hard to feel confident early that things are going to turn around, especially in the presence of hypoxemia early on,” she sai

© 2020 The New York Times Com

<><><><>>>>>><>>><>><<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>><><>>

Is Trump a political tool in the tragic world of plague. ?

As Trump’s condition makes headlines, America’s pandemic is getting worse

(CNN)The extraordinary attention generated by President Donald Trump’s fight with Covid-19 has obscured an alarming turn in a pandemic that is showing signs of accelerating as colder weather approaches, with 2,000 new America deaths recorded since he was diagnosed.

Cases of Covid-19 are rising in 22 states and are falling in only five, according to data collected by Johns Hopkins University, and the death toll in the United States is approaching 210,000. Yet there are few signs, despite the virus sweepin the White House and infecting Trump allies on Capitol Hill of any fresh White House appreciation of the danger or a plan to try to slow the spread of the disease.

The latest close Trump associate to return positive tests were White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany along with two other press aides. There is little indication that the administration has undertaken a serious effort to contact and trace people who were at a Supreme Court nominating event nine days ago at the White House that appears to have infected multiple people. There are no official briefings warning Americans about what they need to do to mitigate the worsening situation. And the government experts who once were front and center are never seen alongside the President.

Trump did say he had learned a lot about Covid-19 during his stay in Walter Reed military hospital where he was taken on Friday, but the main focus of the President’s aides has been projecting him as strong 29 days ahead of an election in which he appears to be in considerable trouble. The President’s drive-by photo-op Sunday in front of supporters gathered with flags and banners outside Walter Reed reflected how he has consistently put his own personal and political goals ahead of a serious approach to the worst public health emergency in 100 years.

On Friday, when Trump went into the hospital, the United States recorded more than 54,000 new cases of the virus and 906 deaths. On Saturday, close to 50,000 new cases were reported along with 687 deaths. And on Sunday, there were 36,600 cases and 410 deaths according to Johns Hopkins figures collected by CNN. Tallies at the weekend are generally lower due to the difficulty of reporting.

Such numbers utterly contradict the message that Trump was giving hours before he was diagnosed with the disease himself, that the US was “turning the corner” and that “the end of the pandemic is in sight.”

The newly diagnosed patients will not have the state-of-the-art facilities, experimental treatments and dedicated hospital suites that are afforded to the President of the United States. Many patients in the pandemic have died alone in crowded hospitals cut off from loved ones.

The government’s top infectious disease specialist Dr. Anthony Fauci, who has been sidelined by the President said that the current baseline average of around 40,000 new cases a day heading into the fall and winter when people spent more time indoors was a danger sign.

“That’s no place to be when you are trying to get your arms around an epidemic,” Fauci said on CNN’s “New Day” on Monday.

Politics take priority over a serious virus response

Trump’s photo-op Sunday in front of supporters gathered with flags and banners outside Walter Reed National Military Medical Center risked exposing Secret Service agents riding in his armored SUV and amounted to a familiar flouting of government recommendations to stop the spread of the virus which has infected 7 million Americans. It was the latest flagrant sign of politics superseding Trump’s duties as a steward of the national well-being – with Election Day only 29 days away and voting in many states already underway.

It came amid lingering confusion about the President’s true state of health after a weekend in which the White House undertook strenuous efforts to minimize the seriousness of his case. But details about the cocktail of therapies that he is taking suggest that he is experiencing complications from the disease, even as his doctors said it was possible he could return to the White House Monday.

White House focuses on optics while America wonders about health of the President

The showman President’s motorcade photo-op followed a misleading and politicized White House performance that displayed all the failures that have made the US anti-Covid effort one of the worst in the world.

White House physician, Navy Cmdr. Dr. Sean Conley, admitted on Sunday to not telling the full truth about Trump’s condition the day before – including about two drops in his oxygen levels – to avoid overshadowing the “upbeat” official line on the President’s health.

Trump and his aides worked hard to show he was strong and getting better before he faces off with Democratic nominee Joe Biden, whose campaign said he again tested negative on Sunday. But the contradictions and misrepresentations from his medical team means that Americans can have no confidence that the White House is giving a complete picture of what’s going on. Conflicting messages and half-truths underscored the administration’s inability to properly manage the machinery of the state and to understand the importance of sending clear information about the President’s health and the continuity of power to Americans and potential adversaries abroad.

‘That should never have happened’: Inside Trump’s Walter Reed parade

The extraordinary attention that accompanies a presidential illness — in this case multiplied because the commander-in-chief is sick from a disease he has ignored, downplayed and said will soon go away — has obscured the alarming trajectory of the pandemic in recent days.

Including Friday, when Trump was dramatically flown to the hospital on Marine One, the US has recorded another 121,000 cases of Covid-19 and another 1,800 deaths. None of those new patients will get the dedicated round-the-clock medical care, experimental treatments, hospital suites and joy rides that are available to the President amid a national emergency in which many have died alone and patients are isolated from loved ones in crowded hospitals.

Trump says he ‘gets it’

White House’s inept ‘contact tracing’ effort leaves the work to others

In a video on Sunday, the President said that he had learned a lot of interesting things about Covid-19 that he planned to share with the country. It was not clear if he was finally appreciating the danger of the virus following his own infection. For months, the President has been briefed by the some of the best epidemiological experts in the world but did not treat the pandemic with the necessary seriousness. His video, posted on Twitter, did not include any admonition to Americans to take the disease more seriously after months of his flouting government health warnings and mocking those who observe them — including Biden.

“I learned it by really going to school. This is the real school. This isn’t the let’s read the book school and I get it. And I understand it,” Trump said.

The President’s subsequent jaunt outside the hospital in Bethesda, Maryland, clearly showed his education in Covid-19 does not include new respect for social distancing.

Such precautions were also ignored at a mostly mask-free event at the White House nine days ago at which Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett for the Supreme Court. At least eight people who attended the event, including the President, have been infected with Covid-19. Trump also ignored precautions at a fundraising event in New Jersey Thursday, where he went despite knowing his close aide Hope Hicks had been diagnosed with Covid-19.

His conduct raises the question of whether he endangered others while knowing he had been in close contact with someone who had tested positive for the virus. White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said Sunday that the President learned about his positive test when he returned from the trip. She did not say when he took the test. And given the obfuscation by the White House over the weekend, the truthfulness of any official statements at this point is in serious doubt.

Several Secret Service officers in the vehicle with Trump Sunday, who were wearing surgical masks and face shields, must presumably now quarantine after being in close contact with a patient with Covid-19, and risk becoming the latest casualties of Trump’s political ambitions.

Here’s who has tested positive and negative for Covid-19 in Trump’s circle

“Why leave? What is the purpose of this?” asked Dr. James Phillips, head of disaster medicine at George Washington University and an attending physician at Walter Reed.

“Certainly looking at the risks of transmission of Covid-19, what we know is being in enclosed spaces is dangerous,” Phillips said on “The Situation Room” on CNN. “Masks or no masks. Being inside a vehicle that is hermetically sealed circulates virus inside and potentially puts people at risk.”

The White House insisted that the car ride was cleared by the President’s medical team. But there is no medical protocol that suggests it is advisable for a patient with a serious, contagious illness to leave a hospital until they have recovered or are no longer contagious.

Trump’s illness robs him of campaign trail push

Trump’s desire to show that he is fit, compulsion to bask in the adoration of his supporters and desire to dictate news coverage is typical. But his latest behavior also may hint at how he feels about the political impact of his confinement a month before an election in which he is trailing Biden and that threatens to turn on his mismanagement of the pandemic. Trump, who has spent the last two presidential campaigns attacking the health of his rivals, Hillary Clinton and Biden, cannot afford to look weak at this critical moment.

Trump campaign adviser says rally protocols won’t change after President’s coronavirus diagnosis

With time running out to turn things around, the President was jolted by new polling data over the weekend. A NBC/Wall Street Journal survey taken following Trump’s boorish performance at last week’s first presidential debate showed Biden leading 53% to 39% among registered voters nationally. An ABC News/Ipsos poll, conducted after news about the President’s coronavirus diagnosis, found that 72% of voters believe the President didn’t take the threat of contracting coronavirus sufficiently seriously. A CBS News poll, meanwhile, found Biden with a 7-point lead among likely voters in the key swing state of Pennsylvania and even with Trump in Ohio — another Midwestern battleground that went to the President in 2016. These surveys were largely completed by the time the President’s coronavirus diagnosis became known.

View Trump and Biden head-to-head polling

It remains unclear how the President’s sickness changes the final weeks of the campaign. He is unable to fly around the country and fire up his loyal base voters. The fate of the last two presidential debates — following the upcoming vice presidential clash on Wednesday between Mike Pence and California Sen. Kamala Harris — remains in doubt. And Trump’s infection now makes it almost impossible for the President to deflect from the one issue that reflects the presidency in its worst light: the pandemic.

Oxygen concerns

White House physician sows confusion with briefings

Earlier on Sunday, Trump’s doctors revealed that the President had suffered several alarming drops in oxygen levels. Conley again delivered a briefing that raised more questions than it answered about Trump’s condition. He said that he didn’t mention drops in Trump’s oxygen levels Saturday because he didn’t want “to give any information that might steer the course of illness in another direction.”

He acknowledged that his evasive answers “came off that we were trying to hide something” but said that “wasn’t necessarily true,” adding that the President is “doing really well” and is responding to treatment.

The episodes prompted doctors to start treating Trump with the steroid drug dexamethasone, which has been shown to help patients with Covid-19. It is typically given to patients on supplemental oxygen or ventilation.

Conley also hinted at more unrevealed details when he refused to say what was revealed by X-rays or CT scans of Trump’s lungs.

“There’s some expected findings, but nothing of any major clinical concern,” he said.

All patients have expectations of privacy. But Trump shoulders a public trust given his position. It is not just crucial for voters to have some understanding of his condition. The health of the President is a crucial national security issue and commanders-in-chief have a higher duty to disclosure than regular citizens.

The approach taken by the President’s doctors suggests to many experts that the White House has been downplaying the seriousness of his condition as he fights a disease in which a patient can quickly deteriorate during the course of the infection over a period of days.

“His physicians are treating him very aggressively. And based on what we know so far, the President is ill,” said Dr. Patrice Harris, a past president of the American Medical Association, told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer.

“We know that during the course of the illness, a patient can feel just fine and suddenly take a turn for the worse. So really for the President’s own health and safety, this visit outside of the hospital was quite risky today.”

View on CNN

© 2020 Cable News Network. A Warner Media Company. All Rights Reservedkoi

Public health experts had hoped that President Trump, chastened by his own infection with the coronavirus and the cases that have erupted among his staff, would act decisively to persuade his supporters that wearing masks and social distancing were essential to protecting themselves and their loved ones.

But instead, tweeting on Monday from the military hospital where he had been receiving state-of-the-art treatment for Covid-19, the president yet again downplayed the deadly threat of the virus.

“Don’t be afraid of Covid,” he wrote. “Don’t let it dominate your life.”

The president’s comments drew outrage from scientists, ethicists and doctors, as well as some people whose relatives and friends were among the nearly 210,000 people who died in the United States.

“I am struggling for words — this is crazy,” said Harald Schmidt, an assistant professor of medical ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania. “It is just utterly irresponsible.”

“Nothing is so much to be feared as fear” - Henry D Thoreau – 1851

“So first of all let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes the needed effort to bring about prosperity once again” to “needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.” – Franklin D Roosevelt – 1933

“I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears, and sweat. You ask ‘What is our aim’. I can answer in one word – victory. Victory at all costs. Victory in spite of all terror. Victory though long and hard the road may be. Without victory is there is survival.” – Winston Churchill - 1940

“Don’t let it dominate. Don’t let it take over your lives. Don’t let that happen.
Don’t be Afraid.” – Donald J Trump – 2020

Three Nobel Peace Prize nominations from foreign countries:

Norway - for the United Arab Emirates-Israel peace deal

Sweden - for normalization of economic relations between Serbia and Kosovo.

Australia - for reducing America’s tendency to get involved in any and every war.

And a fourth is on its way.

What did Mr Obama do to earn his?

  • Mr Lundestad, writing in his memoir, Secretary of Peace, said even Mr Obama himself had been surprised. “No Nobel Peace Prize ever elicited more attention than the 2009 prize to Barack Obama,” Mr Lundestad writes.

“Even many of Obama’s supporters believed that the prize was a mistake,” he says. “In that sense the committee didn’t achieve what it had hoped for”. Geir Lundestad told the AP news agency that the committee hoped the award would strengthen Mr Obama. - in short, merely politics.