Good logic doesn’t kill instinct, it optimizes it.
“become unconscious and free”, well, we would be free from control, but we are hard wired to try to do the opposite of that. We’re hard wired to try to control ourselves more and more, and be controlled by our feelings and our ideas, instead of letting everything go and becoming unconscious.
Impotency Achieved
We are (or I am or they or it ? whatever) 100 % impotent, totally, in all ways, sexually, psychologically, spiritually, you name it. Total failures, total losers. Sore losers. Be a sore loser. No problem can ever be solved, give up all real fast, there are no solutions for any possible problem, end of story. Because of all the information we receive and all of the imaginary battle grounds (ever changing battle grounds) we can’t do absolutely anything about it, we cannot even touch it, or modify the path all those ever changing and new battle grounds follow. Of all of those battles, contradictions, contentions (do you want the right or left to win ? do you want the war in Irak ? do you want more or less taxes ? do you want the green economy or keep on “wasting” gas ? especially do you want “this specific person in jail or to lose” (we love personalizations of contentions, we love to fight people figures) you name it) you cannot do absolutely anything about them, you can’t do nothing about where they go, total 100 % impotency achieved no matter what, they are 100 % independent of your will power, so much so, that it is totally useless even knowing about the battle or following any of all of this information and news BS.
It is all so far away and so detached from anything you can do, and so much of an indirection, denotation, etc. that it is incredible that people waste so much energy and time and emotions and feelings over all of this imaginary, non existent, abstract BS. Who gives two ccks and a dck about Iran, Irak or Afghanistan ? what are they even ? two countries far away that have nothing at all to do with me. And why should I follow any news about them and get all worked up when my power to change or influence or interact with such remote abstract entities is a big fat zero ? So as usual, you better free your mind instead and not think about all of this BS, better no news about anything at all, it is all worthless drivel.
And you are always within a simulation of winning or losing, an emotional roller coaster, where your rage and happiness (but it could also be very shallow, it doesn’t have to be extreme feelings) are constantly being pushed up and down according to who or what is winning.
Is the stock market going up ? do I want it to go up or down ? if I want it to go up “then I win” when it goes up, etc. Is oil “finishing” ? if it does “I win” (if I wanted it to finish), hence I won my little imaginary battle and so on. Actually the “News”, all new information is always framed within an imaginary battle ground of contrasting forces, it is always some form of A versus B, and you have to take sides (do I want A to win or A to happen versus B ? are things going in the direction that I would like them to ? if yes I “feel good”, “I win”, “I have achieved”, if no “I feel bad”, etc.), you automatically take sides no matter what since our mind is a simple one transistor circuit (and we love to imagine how “right” we are, how are positions are all “so correct” and so “special” and how we can “figure the correct way to go” as opposed to all the other slobs, we like “to feel smart” and assign ourselves as smart, correct, the winners and so on), we are designed to fight, to be within the stage of a battle ground (it doesn’t even matter if it is real or fake or make believe or whatever), and after you take sides you break the symmetry of a constant emotional and feeling state to put it in an agitation state of winning - losing - following the game - taking sides, the same old emotional roller coaster, etc.
At least in sports, the battle ground is clearly simply a game, no other consequences and we take sides for fun (sometimes it gets violent and bad anyways, go figure), but in politics, economy, society we take sides thinking that there are “deeper” metaphysical, spiritual reasons, it is supposed to be deeper, what the “common rules of society must be” is so much more important (but is it ? who gives two ccks and a dck!).
But that is also because we need a constant emotional stimulation, since a steady state - a state where no battle is going on is “boring”, so we need new information to fight a new battle (but we don’t fight anything, we just follow the game as spectators hoping a given side wins and “commenting” the game “showing off” how correct we are and how our side must win). It is all based on changing your emotional and feelings state into something that is not neutral or steady and into something that is activated and going up and down and following an input information that is associated with given feelings of feeling good or bad according to “the information coming in”. What an idiotic machine our Man Brain is.
We need a constant new battle ground, and if there is no news to create it, we create it in our own mind, we create new targets to reach (but mos t of the targets are external things that we hope will happen and are independent of our will power), we invent new imaginary targets both in our personal life and in the external social world like will that building get finished ? (if it does I win), will that person do this and that (if they do this I win, etc.), will I get that raise ? Does person A do that or this, whatever etc. So we break a steady state, a neutral state, an indifferent state of feelings to activate good/bad states and involvement.
And every new news fragment becomes the next battle ground, we don’t even notice how many times we change the battle grounds, how what seemed so important yesterday is invisible today, like the Irak war is no longer on the radar, but it was oh, so important for a few years, now the sinking ship is the new battle ground (what did the captain do ? what a c*ck, and everyone likes to feel so superior to the situation) and what happened to the oil spill in the gulf of mexico ? it is off the radar, the battle ground has changed, it no longer creates a new emotional roller coaster.
And we have the never ending “Economic Crisis Adventure”: I read an old 10 years old magazine where they were talking about the then “Economic Crisis” and how the “Economy had to grow more” and such BS. In other words, we have always had (or do we need to create a battle ground ?) an economic crisis. And in the same magazine they were talking about grading system corporations have in order to fire some “non performing” workers, and the managers were saying that they have to invent and force inequality between people, find inequality between people even when there is no apparent inequality.
Like today Italy and Greece are in “Economic Crisis” mode, but I remember that these countries have been in crisis mode for decades, for Italy, after some 15 years of real economic growth from the 1960s to the 1970s, the economy there was always in “crisis mode”, go figure, and yet their level of wealth remains sky high compared to at least a hundred other countries and it will take 100 years for entire continents to reach their puny level of “middle class” wealth, so what gives ? maybe growth is a limited concept from the outset ? maybe a country cannot grow past a certain point structurally ?
And this comparison with Germany and such, well inequality exists, some areas are economically stronger than others, after all Germany fought the entire WWII against the whole world all by themselves, they have always been an economic powerhouse, so what is it with this idea that every country must be as economically as strong as Germany ? doesn’t make sense, you cannot eliminate inequality from the outset, and you can’t make believe that every country or area must become a first class economic region.
It is as if all the states of the USA must become like Silicon Valley, now what sense does that make ? how is that possible ? so Alabama and Kentucky must all become like San Francisco and silicon valley and startups etc. otherwise they are failed economic entities, etc. How idiotic can you get ?
Hey vlad, be your own queer, you don’t need another body, jackass. What a jackass always fighting this imaginary battle against niggers, how crazy can you be ?
Information Particles
Compare the extension and size and the amount of Matter Information occupies with regards to the external macro world. While the macro world with all of its cars, streets, trees whatever are the words, the tags, the categories, the entities information works upon, detaches from, denotes from to create a sequence of abstract symbols that become independent of the material world and can have any possible space and time occupied to express itself (but information as such is independent of space and time and can theoretically, in the limit, occupy zero space and time, as information is a pure mathematical and abstract entity, it is a pure Information Relationship, a formula so to say, a relationship independent of the substrate the information is grounded upon) occupies space and time and is made up of so much irrelevant noise compared to the tags they create (a rock is made up of millions of details and atoms, but it ends up being just a 4 letter word and used just as a pure mathematical entity, a relationship within our language and thought processing system), information is invisible, occupies in theory no space and no time. What a contrast.
But that is why we (our or mine or its ? as usual ? Man Brain) are so much excess capacity ourselves because we are information machines containing a never ending probably infinite amount of information chunks, potential information relationships etc. while the material substrate of it all is heavy and limited.
The limits of matter as it tends to information, the conversion of matter to information, the new Einstein formula for the “information to mass matter converter” or the “matter and mass energy to information converter” …
APE
When you finally get something the value of that something becomes zero, we are always a contradictory machine, or sometimes the value may become even greater the more we have the same thing (you can extend the example to all possible items and narratives and entities), so maybe you bought that new car and the next day you are totally indifferent about it (or maybe angry, even worse off than before you had it, anything as the mind will find a million ways to self torture itself, etc.), but then maybe you will become ever more attached and end up thinking about it always more until it becomes the only possible thing that exists, a total obsession (you are hoping to lose it so you have an excuse to mourn and self torture yourself with regret, and hoping that the past would come back knowing it will never and so crying to yourself, etc. you get the idea).
But even better, you can switch back and forth between something being 100 % important to zero importance in a jiffy (or forget and remember something, or forget to remember, or make up false memories, or make up anything you want, it is all a lie), or create associations, cause and effects in you mind that something is important and valuable exactly because you cannot get it, or maybe only because you can get it and all of the intermediate steps. You will always want that that is impossible to get only to fantasize it, and make it become this impossibly metaphysically high entity when it is only a pure turd, like everything, nothing has value, all is zero, a pure turd. Amen.
Every new configuration of bits our mind is merged in creates a new environment, a new box against which to compare all other boxes we remember (and especially all of the older and previous Information Relationships, imagined or remembered feelings/pains/pleasures or whatever), the comparison, the new reference system, the new situation as compared to the previous or older or even that of 10 years ago, etc. You worked in place A, now you work in place B and you compare, and the new B becomes the new reference system against which to compare all, every new event is a new world, a new reference system, all of the previous ones are nulled, on longer applicable, only applicable as remembered.
Every new event is a new starting point for random actions and reactions, you never know, it never knows, nothing knows, not even after the fact, not even knowing knows.
The sequence of events as the sequence of new reference systems, ever changing and all the values meanings changing, and so on, you take a trip to BRAZIL and then compare all to that, but since there are an infinite number of possible new reference systems, new trips, and even more so, there are infinite number of possible comparisons you can make between the last trip and any other place - situation, compare BRAZIL to JAPAN or to San Francisco or to whatever you remember (and remember memory is vague, flawed, or did we just make up all of those memories, etc.) there are an infinite number of relative reference systems ( the new wife compared to the old ? and so on) then reference systems are inherently relative, all is a comparison and relative, there are no absolutes, only quirks, random, chance, fluke and arbitrary, nothing solid here, it all can be changed.
That is why people need religions, to hinge themselves on something solid, but it is destined to fail because god wanted it this way, wanted a vague impossible world for his turdy and pukey creation of Man Brain…
As in always changing emotions and feelings about something, the constant change, the constant jumping around all over the place, the feelings, decision on what to feel is never clear, vague, doesn’t know what to feel or what it wants, ever changing vague, right and wrong, A or B and A and B and so on, nothing knows what it wants because nothing and everything is always changing his mind forever…
From:
kunstler.com/blog/2012/01/what-gives.html
Please scroll over the following block of text.
Every configuration of bits (complete environment a Man Brain obtains and is instantaneously experiencing from a set of signals from its sense organs (and also the complete set of internal sensations, and all of the simultaneous comparisons operating in parallel with its memory and all the rest)) can transit, navigate, follow a path to any other possible configuration no matter how far away, different, completely different according to how it randomly is pushed there by a mix of external forces and internal will power forces, by a path of new events and configurations setting the stage for another new configuration and event set and paths and so on. Of course the intermediate steps to go from configuration A (trip in BRAZIL ? or more concretely walking down some random street in BRAZIL) to configuration M (a small visit to the local cemetery in NJ ?) may be many separate steps, maybe 10 maybe a trillion or maybe even just one, and the path may be completely random intermediate configurations or it could be, as we usually expect a smooth transition from one situation to the next according to logic, cause and effect and the laws of physics: but there can be trillions of paths that go from point A to point M, and for any point A and any point M there are trillions of possible paths. But we use our Will Power to try to guide the trip, the transformation, the travel from A to M, and we are constrained by the laws of physics that limit which paths can be taken, and at what speed, etc.
But since there is a path that can bring you from any configuration to any other no matter how far out and improbable, a new modified Man Brain knows that there is a path that can bring you from any configuration to any other, so then it simply assigns the configuration it wants on the fly without following any paths like we must follow because we are constrained by our body, and the laws of physics and the contrasting set of other will powers and forces interdicting our desire to reach a given configuration. Or it may desire to follow a very quirky random path visiting many intermediate configurations that furnish a very random set of experiences and sensations, or even a smooth path, and anything else, and it may decide to make some will powers oppose it (but may force itself to always win the confrontation ? or does it want to play the guessing game ? or does it want to see if it can win by itself and accepts any new paths that are imposed because it chose to play closer to how our reality works ?). Of course this modified brain must be carefully designed with a very precise simulator of reality and maybe it can be done in a few decades, but then again does it matter how precise the information set is when all you really want is an experience ? and so the precision can be also very low but the Information Relationship creating the equivalent Experience is just enough for that Man Brain to have exactly the experience it wants, especially when you modify the variable C (of being convinced that something is real) in the mental computer program from our everyday 70 % to 95 % even if a set of signals are totally false (and maybe 100 % unrelated ?, an experience that is independent of the set of signals representing it ? hmm…).
Like when one thinks that a set of behaviors and actions and activities and choices mean so many different things (other people performing them or yourself or a group or an interaction between so many people performing them, etc. cross information groups are communicating to each other, etc.) when they are all disjoint, or you are completely misunderstanding what they mean (but the information itself may misunderstand itself and so on in an infinite recursion. Regrets, self torture ? always and ever (never ?), you will always have a deeper and deeper guilt complex and you will never be ok, oh you should have done this or that, oh what a mistake, just that one decision could have changed everything, oh, how I want to go back to that one decision point or action point or behavior in that circumstance (but as Buddhism teaches, you may go back change your path only to get into a worse path and even worse and more regretful and even more guilt complex plagued reality, etc.) and more importantly the idea of having made a mistake in the past implies that there is an external reality operating: nothing further from the truth, reality is just an instantaneous configuration of bits with our memory of the past conditioning, falsifying and inhibiting (opposing resistance to) the possible new configurations that could be activated, memory as an interdiction towards new configurations of bits), but maybe all is always misunderstanding all, all signals falsify and create a fake language and narrative that means something completely different and again even that meaning becomes another narrative meaning something completely different forever until you get lost forever…
Wow, what a boatload of drivel, trype and self delusion…
From:
counter-currents.com/2012/01 … more-22636
“Thus bankers, by loaning out the money they create for nothing, gain a mortgage on future production of real world goods and services.”
Or are trying to force the world to produce many more goods and services than the world needs or can even absorb, are trying to force and make believe the economy is much richer than it is, but especially, much richer than it can possibly be structurally. In order to compensate the trillions and trillions of dollars of debt and fake money the banks created you would need so much real work and goods and services that there is no way that is is realistically possible.
Add in optimizations and the Technological Economy killing jobs structurally and you have a recipe for insanity and disaster.
Another reason why the only solution is free salaries and homes: since the banks created free money, then they must distribute all the free money, freely, since the machine is crashing, is a logical contradiction, can’t work any other way any more.
Like when you think someone did something for a given reason while the reason was completely different or there was no reason at all. Constant misunderstandings, constant guessing games, you would never have imagined the real reason for him doing that, etc. Always a surprise, and do “real reasons” even exist ? aren’t all reasons hiding other reasons and new reasons and aren’t the reason being invented on the spot, or are some been going on for decades ? etc. I forgot what I forgot but remembered what I forgot but forgot if I remembered what I forgot to remember.
And everyone thinks that there are all different reasons for the same things, but everything is hiding everything, no synchronization here, everything a total mismatch, an embarrassing mismatch and total misunderstanding of all with all ?
And when you see an item, and then see it slightly differently again, and see it yet differently again in a never ending change of perception, ideas or reason ? all change, vague, and rock solid clear and true…
Please scroll over the following block of text. But please waste your time boys and girls you all got your “work” cut out for you today…study it all carefully, JHK will test you on it…
Isn’t it interesting, when you talk to someone who is talking about something, and they are concentrated on that “something”, it is almost as if they are talking to the “something” or themselves, or their capacity to reason, the narrative that they are talking about becomes the real person to whom which they are talking to so to say, they are actually showing off their capacity to reason, as if the person in front is invisible or just a tag or just a design used as an excuse to express a sequence of symbols, a block of text, as if we were all just blocks of potential texts walking around and mixing and matching threads of logic, interacting threads of logic, with a sprinkle of free will possibly “contradicting” some logical threads (but the logical contradiction is always a proxy for a deeper urge to simply beat the other person up, as in man is a fight, or maybe not that extreme, but simply to contradict and approve and mix and match in a never ending vague game of guessing and “we are the same”, or no “we are different on this” and so on, always changing ideas, subjects, issues, a game of interactions, and actions and reactions, the “Human Relationship Game”). But even more interesting is that if the same block of text is output from a pretty face, then it seems to be “more interesting”, it acquires a completely new property; you get confused between the pretty face and the text, but at that point maybe you don’t really care about the text anymore, you are “thinking about” something else, and so on. And how many indirections and thinking about other things can be going on, how many levels away and deep, and lost forever ? and reciprocally thinking of something else, two people or more all talking, distractedly but all thinking of many other things, subtle confusions and mix and matches and changes of perceptions and so on.
And just one bit, one small mistake, one change in perception and the other person can be digitally put in a category, can be extremely simplified as good or bad, no turning back, nothing you did in the past will ever change the final judgment, that subtle phase transition that that one bit mistake provoked, etc.
As in when you see another person and that person remains a mystery that kind of ticks you off until he finally opens his mouth and says something and you can finally possibly classify or determine or define what and where in the never ending sea of logical threads he stands, it is comforting to know that you can know where the person is in the “Debate Space”, in the “Information Space”; the space of possible configurations. But it is cool to see so many anonymous thugs in large cities, all mystery, not talking to you or not saying anything, and that is why you feel lost and threatened and so on. A total mystery until some cue, any clue is hinted so that you try to guess what is going on his mind…
Like when you think about some very complex issue, situation for years and plan and consider and then finally when you reach a decision point you just do something random and throw away years of pondering and meditation and planning. Like when you wanted that car for years, but then, just when you can have it, or just because, from one second to the next, you don’t want it anymore, you completely forget your obsession, nay, you hate it you torture yourself for having “wasted so much time” on that object of desire, and so forth.
All vague, all change, all weird, no stability here, all odd actions and reactions, always changing perceptions, radical changes in a moment, and the same old “what was I thinking ?” game, when you were never thinking anything because there is no thinking to do, we are just a chain reaction fooling itself into thinking that “it has control”. Constant regrets and torments for an imagined future when there is no future, not even imagined, only wild random pure chance that not even the laws of physics and god himself know what is going on.
Like when you want to be in another person’s shoes, you imagine that his condition is so much better when in all truth, he is probably even more unhappy then yourself, but you would never know, you just project what you imagine his advantage is in your fantasizing. Like when you want something, but what you really want is the memory of something, so that you can confirm that you had that something (a trip to BRAZIL for example) so you can think that you have achieved, you have obtained what your will power wanted, you want that chunk of memory confirming reality, and better if confirmed by other independent people, but mostly you need a memory confirmation to activate the circuit that has “I am happy”, I did this", or “I have had this”, or “I have this”, and so on. As if there is something “keeping score”, as if the score will last and is even important. Nothing and no one is keeping score, scores don’t exist, numbers don’t exist, all is a ghost. But we delimit all events within time and by making events pass time we always win and achieve: the goal is to pass time, find ways to be unaware of time, else if you were aware of every second, each second would become longer and longer and we would live an eternity and get bored to death.
why does a chunk of matter need to know what another chunk of matter is feeling or doing, why do we need to be confirmed, why are we always monitoring how much pain/pleasure another chunk of matter is obtaining, why do we talk and communicate to another independent will power chunked of matter ? to be sure that something has something in common with us ? to feel part of ? but part of what ? part of our own imagination ? our envy ? jealousy, or what ? A chunk of matter wants other chunks to be similar to itself so as to feel confirmed and comfortable and defined, hinged upon something solid, so all the talk, communication, importance of cell phones and Internet, you name it.
It all goes back to the problem of absolutes and relatives, we want absolutes but the Universe is all relative, hence undefined, not clear, vague, dangerous, iffy, at all times, and our very structure of mind, our very will power, the very structure of Matter and Mass Energy is trying to guess itself, is playing jokes on itself, is playing an obscene guessing game with itself, and always guessing wrong, always being dead wrong on everything. Matter is always telling lies to itself because only lies exist in the Universe, it is impossible to tell itself anything else…
Wow, what a boatload of drivel, trype and self delusion…
From:
kunstler.com/blog/2012/01/what-gives.html
Like p*rn, interesting to see the image to instinct converter, why it is so intriguing, maybe because it activates the circuit in between parallel to serial, parallel sense organ inputs associated to a sequential logical path (along with morality, rules, laws, other emotions/feelings whatever). So do we “fall in love” with our instinct, with the image of the pretty, or with ourselves, are we intrigued by how instinct is captured by picture, or something around there. And does a pretty face that talks associate and denote and indirection and symbol to something else ? is the indirections adding up, is everything mixed, along with will power challenges and games, a never ending recursion of guessing games, never to be sure of any outcome not even after 100 years (being sure brings boredom). Why women must be stupid (or pretend to be ?)…
Like every moment everything must be reconstructed from scratch, every new configuration of bits (in mind and in external reality ?) must be reproduced, a completely new creation, a new big bang, every instant a new universe, who knows what is next…
On the variable C (being convinced of the reality of something variable)
From:
“Therefore no stretching of space or black hole travels are necessary to travel in time, only the creation of the equivalent information relationships. It is just as real, as real isn’t defined, real is just how much you are convinced that it is real and since you can never be convinced 100 % of something and not even 0 %, the variable C (convinced) is a number greater than zero and less than 100, then any number is equivalent and equally true.”
“So there, give me my nobel prize. C, “the degree of being convinced variable” is the real secret, this variable defines reality, you can change it, just assign it, it is done and true. I went to 1950 NJ, and then to 2400 Mars, and they told me this, that is how I learned it. You can also travel in space, as all locations are just a different configuration, so even the speed of light is exceeded. Now go to the other galaxy and come back, and go to 5 trillion years in the past and future, have fun.”
What is the next action reaction between two people encountering, it is the quirk sum of what they remembered of the person, or what they imagine; sometimes a person generates always the same reactions and activates always the same circuits, sometimes it is completely random, sometimes a person is just a standard set of memorized reactions having a standard meaning and region of interaction, a given delimited interaction space only for that person.
It will be discovered that the real nature of the universe is purely metaphysical: like how will the universe end, what is its large scale structure ? cyclical or just a big bang and then it withers away ? So what difference does it make ? a set of frequencies that interact and match and mismatch to create reality then nothing else.
So either picture, you end up looking at the whole only metaphysically, nothing else you can do with it, but meditate it from a metaphysical point of view, which mean simply what it means to “us”, that is this very arbitrary, random and fluke design of Man Brain…
Better Nothing or Something ? Better Nothing. Is this all there is to life ? Yes, limit your desires, limit life to a few bits, you will be happier, kill thoughts and memory. Amen.
Can we control what we think ? (and why we ? the generalized chunks of matter that resemble my man brain ? people are all chunks of matter in this philosophy), no we are driven by random, the mind can’t control what it thinks. Self delusion, lie to yourself, and yet the more you lie to yourself and you know it is lying, the more you delude yourself and feel rage and angry and a sore loser and a pissed of loser, and a failure (this is the new normal) the truer that lie becomes, the more valid, reality is directly proportional to the self delusion, to the intensity of the lie: you can’t do anything else but lie to yourself always. If you can’t get from combination of bits A to C, then associate (a one to one correspondence) that combination to one where you can perform the previously impossible path ( a simpler path F to Y , a projection, a mkae believe, but then you may not ever be able to do the simpler F to Y, but the original A to C and you hose yourself again, go figure) making believe that it is A to C.
And what reaction can you expect from the encounter with another person (chunked out matter carved into a man brain) ? any reaction, the reaction is unknown not only to that other person, but also your own, you may become indifferent or angry or run away or anything, the other person doesn’t know what reaction to have as all is always a test, a guess, combinations of bits in brains colliding and not knowing at all what the resulting new combinations will be.
But most likely, near indifference, nothing at all, very little excitement or change, just boredom, no really new thing to guess here. Encounters are mostly huge letdowns because our expectations are always too high maintenance, we are excess expectations aside from excess capacity from the outset. Be letdown, accept total letdown and free your mind. And many people create simply repetitive patterns in their everyday encouters, simplify life, a comforting repetition where everything is perfectly planned, but any slight change may become allarming a threat ?
And notice how words (or thought paths, pictures, behaviors, whatever) become alive, sometimes as you talk about things, the words become more and more real strangely, they become associated with deeper past feelings/emotions/pain/pleasures even though they are independent and probably have nothing to do with anything at all. That is why we can write the same drivel over and over again and it always looks new, even if it is exactly the same, it is always 100 % new because our man brain and universe has transitioned into a slightly new combination of bits creating a 100 % new creation, new big bang, new universe, infinitely different from anything before, completely new feelings, go for it man, it is all false, man, repeat.
There is a large impedance mismatch (use complex words, make the concepts vague, make it fancy and hard to understand so that it looks deeper than what it really is) between what we expect, how we imagine something to play it (and how the other person, group or machine or whatever imagines and plans how something will play out) and what really happens on the ground: what happens is always random, a fluke, you would never have expected that outcome, etc.
That is cool,our fantasizing is always just theory and pretty pictures, reality bites back, shows us who the boss is, contradicts us for fun, and all our expectations and plans and what we hope is thrown down the toilet where it belongs: so go on, plan something new, it will never play out like you expect, and even if it did, you would keep on planning new games until you lose, since what we really are all after is the loss, we want to mourn, we want to complain, we want to be unhappy as that defines our steady state (and so we have an excuse to fight back and beat someone up, as an imaginary detached abstract will power opposed our desires) it will never be ok, even if you won all everyday for a trillion years, the last second, the very last one and only loss will cancel all your wins because reality is simply the very present instantaneous configuration of bits and what it means, etc.
Life is not only not worth analyzing, it is not worth living, we must change how Matter undergoes Experience by changing the Observer, the design of the observer, shove it down the toilet and use the very toilet as a new brain, as in brainium, all could be a potential brain…
TOBOR AN APE
From:
kunstler.com/blog/2012/01/what-g … ent-108055
Why was I so happy when I was a little boy (and why should anyone give a sh*t ?) ? I could draw my cars and play in the backyard in the suburbs while mommy cooked, I could imagine my science fiction world (back then science was the future, now it is a sin) and I always played around with fake new brains decoding the world in wild fun ways, colorful ways even when I was five years old, go figure. And no one wanted to play with me, they didn’t like my games. And I didn’t like other people, they all sucked for me and still do, why on earth are they different from me !!! why and how is this even possible ??? how I hate all their guts and the world’s gut for being not how I want it!!! go figure…
What happend along the way ? how did I become this sad, sad huge piece of turd ? how did I degrade in time ? who knows…eat, drink and be merry, life is a bitch and god doesn’t exist…
"Overpopulation and balkanization lowers the quality of life.
========================
This is another CFN “truism” that never gets challenged. I am here to challenge it. "
That should have been eat, drink and be merry, life is a bitch and then you die…
I have been always challenging the overpopulation myth, for me we can easily handle thousands of trillions of new skyscraper builders and oldsmobile builders…
From:
kunstler.com/blog/2012/01/what-gives.html
6:52 to wagelbr:
“I agree that there needs to be a national income, as even Nixon and Milton Friedman agreed in the 70s.”
God punishes you by making your dreams come true. You don’t know what you are wishing for.
You never know how things could play out even if you did all I wanted. it could turn into a hell anyways, everything is unpredictable.
I think that that would be the wrong way to do it: you just can’t bluntly say we will give out free money: you must first create large projects and goals most of the society would approve of, a large mass transit (public - private ?) BUS system that could involve alot of different companies, people, internet, software whatever. Next a large buildings program creating many different kinds of new building all over the USA, construction is good, it increase the amount of wealth in a society by lowering the cost of a basic need, houses and real estate and space for offices, etc. Next, fire the imagination of the young, start a goal of Man on Mars by 2020, you get the idea. Next set up a government (and state and local run) health care system that has most of the basics, it may not be top notch but should do most of the job people need, if you want better, more etc. good, pay for your own private health care, nothing wrong with that, etc.
And after, in the background, silently, without anyone noticing it start a very gradual different kind of welfare system where cheap health care and a small free salary and cheap rents can be gradually introduced.
Will it ever happen ? NO. Why ? because people are too conflictual, ideological, right against left, stereotyping everything, simplifying everything…
1:32 To BeanBill:
“my is that we have created way too much debt. Debt should only be created to increase productivity, not to consume more goods and services.”
But what is money if not more exchanges of goods and services ? So you are dead wrong, debts actually means the need to consume ever more goods and services, so much more that there is no way that saturated western economies can do it anymore as they are all full of all of this BS.
What is productivity ? oh, you mean producing the same with fewer workers ? finding ways to produce more with less inputs ? right ? and that means somewhere down the line fewer jobs. I don’t remember how many times I heard this BS of “productivity” (which no one really knows what it is and how to define it, because it is one of those abstract words that are supposed to justify firing people, restructuring and all in the name of some metaphysical entity that is undefined or defined as anything you want it to be). It really simply means increasing profits by using fewer workers, end of story.
I am sick and tired of people repeating all of the Standard Economic ideology that means nothing, is undefined, no one knows what they are talking about, there is no clear cut concrete example and understanding of how these words really map onto real day to day life etc. the same old “Productivity”, “Innovation”, “Startup”, “Small Businesses”, “Competition”, “More Education”, “New Skill Sets”, you name it BS that hasn’t provided anything to anyone in years…except huge profits to the 1 %.
God punishes you by making your dreams come true.
Please, Scroll over the following blocks of text.
slut says:
"You ask: What happened along the way? How did I become this sad, sad huge piece of turd?
I’ll take a stab at it… you are heavily afflicted with Asperger’s Syndrome…"
No, I think it is more like “Obsessive Compulsive” forcing me to write this huge pile of BS (along with other broken gears in the Man Brain…); but anyways, that is the point, who defines “Normal” ? even if a thousand trillion people (point like chunks of matter spatially and temporally separated, but acting as mostly one vague entity of sets of thought paths, communication channels between, inside, and in between the inside and outside the points, interacting with other more invariant and will power free chunks of matters (the buildings, mountains cars…), amongst (and inside each point like Observer and amongst the points, etc.)) all reach a consensus on what the normal set of patterns of behaviors and patterns of interaction between people are, who says that it has any value or worth outside what they ARBITRARILY DEFINED ? And then, as you see you go back to the modified brains problem, the absolutes and relatives problem: which brain design is the reference system, the ground state, the point zero upon which all other brains must be measured and compared to and defined ? which is reality and which is a test, a “fake brain” ? neither of the two different brain designs can declare themselves the absolute reference system, hence all is arbitrary, hence there is no “Normal”.
And it is also very easy to define any behavior or pattern that is not within a statistical range of make believe and arbitrary patterns that a society, civilization but more correctly a tribe decided was the “norm” as a “sickness” needing to be “cured”.
And very convenient for doctors and health care creeps making money by saying you are “autistic”, you are “this” and you are “that”, etc. and since you are outside of the statistical average you “must be cured” and pay me money for this.
And even more interesting is, when you see those very crazy people in crazy houses, those that have very different and frightening behaviors, how hard it is to look at them, how much a punch in the stomach those behaviors appear; they make you feel bad (and imagined “bad for them”?). But what is really going on is we are seeing a small glimpse of how very arbitrary the world is according to our definitions of normal brains, how all can change if the man brain is working differently, all of our security disintegrates, all of what we think is objective shows its subjective and variable face: once again there are no absolutes but only relatives.
A man brain is definitely the most artificial and less spontaneous contraption you can ever think of: as soon as you think and start to know other people think, and think like you or similar, you enter the infinite loop of I know you are thinking that you know that I am thinking that I know that you are thinking about this and that, and our interaction, and I can see through you partially, and I can partially guess or try to guess what you are trying to guess what I think, and I will act according to how I imagine you could judge me, knowing that the judgment could change in a jiffy if I do something that may be slightly wrong, but I can’t know if it is wrong, since you may give me trick clues to make me make a mistake, and then make fun of me, but I can do the same, but then I can get confused and not be sure if the joke is on me, or you, or this or that and I can never really know where your thought paths are going and if there is an intersection with mine, if I can use you or you can use me, but then I do (or don’t ?) want a dependency on you, but so do you, but then the next moment you are completely indifferent to me, or vice versa, I want to simply beat you up, or you want to me, but I want to condition you, but then I don’t and you don’t want to condition me, but you are conditioning me anyways and all we do does the exact opposite of what we thought we wanted, but we changed our minds, etc…
So given how fake and artificial a standard Man Brain is, any other design is just as real and maybe more authentic, less artificial, less problematic…
A deep infinite recursion of reciprocally conditioning imaginary minds (and even if they are not present as the internet shows, they can be thousands of miles away, invisible and not even existing) that become real in our mind because we know that there is some point in space and time where a real similar mind is operating…
Wow, what a blog hog I am ! That is not good manners now is it ? That is not good behavior ! Hey alexandra, slut, did you build me my trillions of skyscrapers and oldsmobile ninety eights ? why didn’t you ? why did you disobey me ? please, pretty please build me what I demand…you whore get vlads black d*ldo and use it too, you horny bitch…Now crack open your skull, shove a jet engine in it, you will enter a new universe…
And notice how we can keep on writing this BS forever, the blocks of text never end, the nature of language is to be able to say similar things over and over and over again but seeming like they are saying slightly different things, that look always completely new, so strange, go figure…I hope, I really hope I run out of BS to post here, tell me it has all been said, all has been said, pretty please ?
TOBOR THE EIGHTH MAN
From:
kunstler.com/blog/2012/01/what-gives.html
Unemployment Solved !
If we get all 7 billion people in the world to read all of my posts all day long over and over again for a trillion years, well finally unemployment will have been licked, no unemployment here anymore, it has been achieved, an age old complex, intractable social - cultural - economic and political problem has finally been solved once and for all!
Finally, everyone in the world has a clear cut productive task for them, they finally have a clear cut goal, they can finally all work and achieve by my simple solution!
Wow, and people are always thinking, and examining, and trying to figure out, and we now have thousands upon thousands of blocks of text trying to explain the complexities of the economy, what is wrong, what must be done, who’s fault it is, this and that, money, OWSers, tea party, Europe, JAPAN you name it.
When all along, the solution was staring right in everyone’s eyes: the very blocks of texts themselves, just let everyone worldwide read them over and over again forever, for 8 hours a day and give them a free salary and cheap rent. It has finally been solved.
Troll Alert! Troll Alert! Please ignore the following post. Please ignore all the posts from me. Please erase all the posts from me on the Internet.
There is always one last idiotic concept that I forgot to say. Ah Shucks, when will it end ? There will always be one last concept that has not been said, why do the concepts never end ? please make them end, pretty please…
Like when we think of an item, person, situation, whatever and that thing becomes more important for us than it is for itself, like when we think of something and we actually become that something (don’t we always become 100 % what we think ?). We think of item A and that item becomes more important for us than it would ever be for item A itself, nay, item A probably completely ignores itself, doesn’t even know that it is the object of so much obsession and thought, would have never guessed. And why should another chunk of matter become important for a given chunk of matter ? why do chunks of matter want to be other chunks of matter, why to switch places ? because they imagine and construct a completely falsified fairy tale, greatly exaggerated on how “much better” the other chunk of matter is undergoing the phase transition of Matter to Experience. And isn’t communication always a set of symbols targeting imaginary minds ? generalized imaginary potential actions and reactions (but totally unpredictable, not even for itself, not even the mind (or minds ?) itself can ever know what it will do!) according to how the neural circuits of a given mind has been programmed (throughout the personal history ?) as a reply to symbols…
And then, as soon as we think of anything, consciously, doesn’t that anything become everything, don’t we become exactly 100 % that item we are thinking about ? So strange, we become the contents of our thought, the Matter to Thought Converter, we become our concepts…but remember that I use “WE” only as a proxy to mean “I” or “IT” or “WHATEVER”, since it is a simple device to represent the generalized contraption of similar thinking Man Brains.
Nonlinearity is the name of the game: in all areas, endeavors, in all social relationships, in all things you may think, what you think is probably cause and effect, may be the exact opposite: for example the more I do A the more I will get B, when in all truth most probably the exact opposite is operating, the more you do A the farther away from B you get (especially when two dating people interact ?) (only maybe to have B immediately occur when you least expected it ?) and so with reciprocal minds interacting, what is stable becomes always more stable and excludes a large number of possible new behavior and interaction patterns; until maybe, when you least expect it, the linearity shows up all of a sudden (was it hiding behind a nonlinearity ? or were there many layers of linearities hiding behind non linearities and so forth ?) or a completely new nonlinearity may become operative, or maybe, no you were right, it is the same old, same old linearity operating, hard work brings more wealth for a society for example, and flowers will always buy a lady’s heart and such huge BS.
But the entire endeavor of constantly explaining things, analyzing, trying to figure out the “laws that are operating”, the “illuminism”, “positivism”, “reason will set you free” myth is based on determinism, thinking that reality can be understood, controlled, constrained within a set of laws and manipulated. Nothing further from the truth (always this same idiotic sentence, when all I say is always all wrong, go figure), everything is random, pure chance, a quirk unpredictable. Therefore all of the above is totally false and everything is completely predictable, crystal clear.
Everything is linear, predictable and if you predicted wrong you are simply a loser, a sore loser…
Ignore this troll, all the information he furnishes is false, all he says is wrong and the opposite of all what he says is true…
From:
kunstler.com/blog/2012/01/what-gives.html
Please, Scroll over the following blocks of text. It is someone sh*ting on the Internet.
Good evening ph*ktards ! Excuse me if I suck too much, but I can’t really do anything about it…
We need a content that activates constant thought paths, what we want is an excuse to think and try to figure out something, a plan, an imaginary work in progress as a never ending sequence of thoughts, calculations, logical situations and imaginary sets of causes and effects that will finally bring to a new thought conclusion, so as to think that a long series of past thought paths, past events, causes and events, past guesses, past interactions with things and people (or that “special” person ?) and mistakes, you name it has finally made us reach a concluding thought synthesis: a conclusion, a definite plan, etc. But alas, it will never be so, we will always make a mistake, we will never conclude the work in progress, we will never find the final solution as it depends on random quirks, other will powers that are just as lost as you, on random changes in other people’s judgments and desires, everything changes constantly because nothing can be very stable, etc.
And we are actually in love exclusively with our thought paths, ever changing, ever needing to be activated, we need content, a start point and target point, if only in our mind, if only just fantasized to keep our mental computer program running, and as the mental computer program runs and runs it gives us a feeling of achieving, of being right, of producing, of getting closer to all of our solutions to problems (if they really are problems or imaginary problems ? and as the progam runs it activates slight good feelings, or slight satisfaction feelings ? all a very simple - complex machine our Man Brain), and as I said in the past, give them a content, they will be happy.
So we calculate a situation that depends on how another third party (or thing ? or group of persons ?) will react, should react, how we hope will react and all the intermediate steps and situations. And we try to imagine and calculate what inputs, what activities, what behaviors, what anything will bring forth a certain reaction, (but even the resulting reaction desired is never very clear, is not very clear cut, in other words, we don’t really even know what we want and we are always changing our minds and ideas and judgments because we are essentially a crashed computer program with too many possible inputs and too many possible outputs not knowing which to choose or even if any should be chosen).
So what to do ? leave it to the free play of forces, don’t push anything at all (or just slightly push it ?) wait to see if the action reaction will play out automatically (but I doubt it), and the golden rule: leave the reaction the job of executing some stimulation that brings forth a play of forces that may bring some desired result that you really are not even sure you want, or what you want.
Notice the level of abstraction. Jesus ph*king Christ and you slobs are insane enough to even read this ?!?!?!
AN APE