Assume that all knowledge is conceptual…
The Law of Identity states (the “Truth”): x = x
However, if all knowledge is conceptual, then identity is infinitely more untrue than “true”: x ≠ x
Assume: [x] [equals] [x]
0=[x] 1-‘letter’, 2-‘symbol’, 3-‘sound’, 4-‘English’, 5-‘alphabet’, 6-‘ex’, 7-‘y’, 8-‘z’, 9-‘cross’, 10-etc.
0 ≠ 0
0 = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Conclusion:
If all knowledge is conceptual, then symbolic meaning behind any “Formology” is always incomplete and imprecise in meaning. One neural concept is linked to all neural concepts at any given time. Nothing ever means the same thing under a space-time context.
Therefore, to understand any context, it must be thought of in terms of five working dimensions: space (1, 2, 3) - time (4) - reality (5)
The reality of any possible knowledge is contextual, outside of singular “points” in space-time. The mind moves through the past, present, and future to memorize, acquire, and predict functions. “Reality” itself can expand or collapse in a setting of space-time-reality based on reasonability, or, the ability for a person to “expand” or “collapse” their mind through contexts.
P.S. You’re welcome. Now go tell all your stupid little friends and claim this knowledge as your own. I look forward to being proven wrong/right someday.