From Brian Green’s, The Elegant Universe:
[b]In 1965 Richard Feynman, one of the greatest practitioners of quantum mechanics, wrote:
‘There was a time when the newspapers said that only 12 men understood the theory of relativity. I do not believe there was ever such a time. There might have been a time when only one man did because he was the only guy who caught on, before he wrote his paper. But after people read the paper a lot of people understood the theory of relativity in one way or the other…On the other hand, I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics.’
Although Feynman expressed this view more than 3 decades ago, it applies equally well today…Quantum mechanics is different…In a real sense those who use quantum mechanics [today] find themselves following rules and formulas laid down by the ‘founding fathers’ of the theory…without really understanding WHY the procedures work or WHAT they really mean.
What are we to make of this? Does it mean that on a microscopic level the universe operates in ways so obscure and unfamiliar that the human mind, evolved over eons to cope with phenomona on familiar everyday scales, is unable to fully grasp ‘what really goes on’? Or might it be that through historical accident physicists have constructed an extremely awkward formulation of quantum mechanics that, although quantitatively sucessful, obfustcates the true nature of reality? No one knows. Maybe some time in the future some clever person will see clear to a new formulation that will fully reveal the ‘whys’ and the ‘whats’ of quantum mechanics. And then again, maybe not. The only thing we know with certainty is that quamtum mechanics absolutely and unequivocally shows us that a number of basic concepts essential to our understanding of the familiar everyday world FAIL TO HAVE ANY MEANING when our focus narrows down to the microscopic realm. As a result, we must significantly modify both our language and our reasoning when attemting to understand and explain the universe on atomic and subatomic scales.[/b]
So, I’m guessing this has something to do with philosophy. Or something to do with the world we live in?
Also, exploring the quantum world seems less mysterious to me than attempts to understand how and why time and space itself came into existence. After all, it is within these astrophysical parameters that quantum interactions take place. And why one set of laws and not another?
When one thinks of existence in terms of infinite time and space the mind is boggled. But no more so than trying grasp how time and space came into existence in the first place.
And the odds I suspect are overwhelming that we will all be long dead and gone before it is found out.
In other words, remind yourself of the passionaite quest Carl Sagan brought to cosmogony. And then try to imagine him on his death bed. He was an atheist and he presumed that death would thrust him forevermore into oblivion. He wanted so badly to to understand these things. And he knew he never, ever would.
And yet, if atheists and agnostics need a hope to cling to as they stare down into the abyss, they really only need to grasp just how unimaginably enigmatic and inscrutable and surreal existence almost certainly is.
Who the hell really knows what happens to us after we die?
And it will stun me if the man or the woman who finally does find out is a professional philosopher.