You will find that I have only small concern over what physicists agree on (in modern English a “physician” is a medical practitioner).
That depends on who you are referring to when you say “we”.
A “static point”? So you are saying that anyone over 30 is static and although alive, doing nothing, accomplishing nothing, merely fading away and nothing more?
If you get a toy spin-top, give it an eternal energy source and a means to replace its materials (both can be done today), it will spin eternally. Of course a truck might run over it. It has no consciousness and thus cannot avoid impending danger. But as a non-living entity, it is anentropic and momentous, “perpetual”. Its entropy has been canceled. It is not dying.
In the mid to late 1990’s the last few remaining causes of aging were identified. It was predicted that in merely another 25 years, each of those would be resolved as well. At this point, a homosapian can live eternally, and is conscious and thus can avoid that truck. The causes of entropy can now be canceled. Of course it is only done for the extremely wealthy, not because of the cost, but because the wealthy believe in a pyramid of supreme power floating above a Gehenna of the masses soon to be replaced by machines. But such people become anentropic. They are older than 30 years and are not dying.
So which is “stronger”, entropy or anti-entropy?
Living anti-entropic entities can learn how to not over-use the anti-entropy and thus they can become anentropic, having conquered both entropy and anti-entropy and can apply either as needed in order to continue being stable, anentropic.
Thus Anentropy is “stronger” than both entropy and anti-entropy. It is the balancing of the two, a synthesis and symphony of harmony.
As you say;
…“more”, not “less”. And doable even today. People die today ONLY because of the way homosapians are managed.
And where something is, there is anti-entropy, and even there, where “nothing” is, will be soon anti-entropy.
The Chosen have already separated themselves to live in their “Utopia”. They have already “ascended” into their Ivory Tower. It is only a matter of time before they replace the rest of the population with machines. But are they being socially anti-entropic or anentropic? They are socially anti-entropic and thus will cause a cataclysm that even they, with all of their wealth and glory cannot do anything to stop. So in the “end”, if Anentropia is not chosen as a means to live (rather than the Pyramid), anti-entropic forces are going to win = “Black-hole”. There is no greater anti-entropic entity in the entire universe than a Black-hole, perhaps the destiny of every organic civilization. They simply do not know how to stop and be truly anentropic (else they would be doing it out in the world).
In The Matrix film series, you see the battle between the Oracle and the Zionists vs the Architect and the machines. In the end, who wins? They settle on a truce, a pseudo-anentropic state. But in reality, although that began a new day, a new age, it is not the real end of the story.
What do you think happens to a truce between the eternally dying and the eternally living? A pyramid requires constant anti-entropic forces to maintain its form. And thus must constantly be fighting entropic forces, always gaining more power to win a battle that can never be won except by the annihilation into a Black-hole floating in space.