Yes. If your various exclamation points, etc., can be interpreted to mean something like: Hey, but I thought you didn’t think it existed what was all that stuff about not being able to deduce…etc., I was arguing in general, not because your conclusion was one I disagreed with, but the process seemed weak to me. I stand by my issues with deducing it exists because a subconscious exists, but, for my own intuitive and experiential reasons do in fact believe in something that could be called that.
I was using it as an example, a hypothetical. That said, I do think men and women are angry at each other…all of them. There are degrees of this and degrees of awareness of this.
I’ll do that. I am not a Freudian, though I suppose I am a post-Freudian. There are things not dreamt of in his philosophy that I beleive exist. And I think he saw some patterns and made them rules when they are not. I also think his map of the mind is limited. I rather liked Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson’s book on how Freud ended up with his SEduction Theory. It nicely places Freud in his time as an individual.
I do not think it is just consciousness however. There is also a super…hm, not sure a good term here, but it would be feelings, desires, urges, intuitions. What fills the internal space of consciousness. That from which consciousness springs and which gives life.
A lot of the mystical traditions have what I would consider a rather male idea of transcendence, this super awareness. Sort of a Buddha, or Angel gazing out over existence. I think that’s only part of life.