Moderator: MagsJ
No woman wants to be raped.
I have always found such discourses rather lewd. The reason being that, as Confucius and Plato noted, a person is mind, and therefore superior or inferior related to mind. Now, a superior mind, even noted by Kohlberg, abstracts concepts from the environment, while the inferior are want to parrot. A superior person lives by standards.
quetzalcoatl wrote:No woman wants to be raped.
Some do though, I’m not talking theory here. I understand how you feel though, but I think these subjects have to be taken for what they are, it’s a curious topic which goes deep into the subconscious and may have its roots in e.g. abuse [for both parties].
AnitaS wrote; It comes down to control - in a "rape fantasy" the "victim" (male or female) is in control throughout the experience, which is obviously not the case in the real thing.
quetzalcoatl wrote:I don’t think its ever an acceptable thing though, because the said minority play to a majority of rapist who aren’t playing the game. They may have been abused and have real anti-woman issues, even to the point of killing.
This is well put.volchok wrote:quetzalcoatl wrote:I don’t think its ever an acceptable thing though, because the said minority play to a majority of rapist who aren’t playing the game. They may have been abused and have real anti-woman issues, even to the point of killing.
I don't really understand your argument. Woman who have a rape fantasy don't have it written on their foreheads. They usually try to fulfill the fantasy with someone they trust which brings me to my next point which is rape fantasy isn't really the fantasy of being raped per se. It's the fantasy of experiencing and going trough certain feelings and circumstances that ones goes trough when being raped (i.e. loss of control) but always knowing that it's safe. It's like watching a film. You suspend your disbelief for a while but you know it's a film.
I don't really understand your argument. Woman who have a rape fantasy don't have it written on their foreheads. They usually try to fulfil the fantasy with someone they trust which brings me to my next point which is rape fantasy isn't really the fantasy of being raped per se. It's the fantasy of experiencing and going trough certain feelings and circumstances that ones goes trough when being raped (i.e. loss of control) but always knowing that it's safe. It's like watching a film. You suspend your disbelief for a while but you know it's a film.
I have had fantasies of being wrongfully imprisoned and other fantasies of hardship that I would ALWAYS answer no to if offered the real thing. Somehow the visual images - which are both temporally and experientially rather different from the real experiences - experienced in the privacy and safety of wherever I create them, serve some psychological purpose. Even if the real thing served this purpose, it is actually something else completely and the negative qualities far outweigh the positive.
quetzalcoatl wrote:
Ever heard of third parties? Imagine for example that in a social group or in a magazine [e.g. a mens mag] the fantasy was played out and well known by the group. If there were a member of said group or a reader of the mag the story was in, who was in fact a rapist or someone who fantasised about it [the actual thing], then to them it may justify their aims.
That's quite ridiculous. Should we stop playing video in games so that people don't become terrorists?
quetzalcoatl wrote:
You are probably right, however terrorism in games/films etc is usually portrayed as the enemy and negative [for similar reasons].
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]