On masculinity and dealing with modern manipulative women.

[Tyrannus]

Making this thread as a place to discuss what it is to be a man in interaction to women along with being a guide as to put up with modern narcissistic self centered women that comprise ninety five percent of the female population.

For now enjoy some nice videos while I currently think of some talking points to interject in this thread by yours truly that basically discusses the same subject that I have in mind here.

I give you the manhood academy. Funny and comedic that discusses the modern conflict of the sexes pretty well.

Their website: http://manhood101.com/

Their notorious "E" book for men can be found here: http://manhood101.com/principles101.pdf

[Duality]

The best approach is to make sure you get your way in all matters, - and if they disagree or complain about that in any way, shape or form, - tell them to "piss off" .


Also don't do or provide anything for them that you may at a later date end up having regretted doing.

[gib]

Ty, why don't you make one thread on women where you can dump all your emotional baggage whenever you feel like doing so? Why are you spewing out thread after thread after thread on the same theme. It's almost like spam.

[Silhouette]

Ty, why don't you make one thread on women where you can dump all your emotional baggage whenever you feel like doing so? Why are you spewing out thread after thread after thread on the same theme. It's almost like spam.

Agreed.

Ty, you don't like women because you want them but can't get them and therefore it has to be their fault rather than your own in order to save your ego. Can we move on now?

[Tyrannus]

The best approach is to make sure you get your way in all matters, - and if they disagree or complain about that in any way, shape or form, - tell them to "piss off" .


Also don't do or provide anything for them that you may at a later date end up having regretted doing.

Yes, I call this the kicking to the curb response. It works very well. It is very effective.

"Bitch, if you don't like this you can always go leave and I'll find another bitch to replace you with."

[Tyrannus]

Ty, why don't you make one thread on women where you can dump all your emotional baggage whenever you feel like doing so? Why are you spewing out thread after thread after thread on the same theme. It's almost like spam.

I'm not going to make anymore threads on the subject if it makes you feel any better Mr. sensitive.

I think I have three or four threads all on differing issues of the sexes subject wise in material. If you look at all of them each one addresses a particular issue of the sexes.

[Tyrannus]

Ty, why don't you make one thread on women where you can dump all your emotional baggage whenever you feel like doing so? Why are you spewing out thread after thread after thread on the same theme. It's almost like spam.

Agreed.

Ty, you don't like women because you want them but can't get them and therefore it has to be their fault rather than your own in order to save your ego. Can we move on now?

Move on? We haven't even warmed up yet on the topic.

[Tyrannus]

Videos explaining what a mangina is.

Video one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5OdQGbVNa4#t=260

Video two.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPHYPHf0PfE

[Tyrannus]

Definitions of a mangina:

1. when a guy pulls his dick and balls back between his legs (forming a basket of fruit behind him) and then putting his legs together to simulate the look of a vagina
That's one hairy mangina.

2. 1. A man totally controlled by a woman

3. A weak willed man

4. The partner that takes it in the anus in a male homosexual relationship

5. A male prostitute, gay or straight

6. That mangina would never disobey his wife.

7. That magina just will not stand up for himself.

8. Jim's mangina, John, wants to get married.

9. Joe is a mangina, he has to turn tricks to keep his place.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=mangina

[Tyrannus]

A video explaining how to go on a date with today's prostitute privileged female class.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_2LpLhOsc4#t=110

[Tyrannus]

Joe Rogan shows how to take down a uppity feminist bitch in a public setting.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXXwcvojbJc

Joe Rogan character assassinates another uppity woman.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp7ovdTXGLM

[Tyrannus]

Bill Burr - There's no reason to ever hit a woman?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlvvCYUD ... gCcqFHu7HO

Bill Burr - Female "work" versus the work of men

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsghfxYq ... x0AJoMce_s

Bill Burr - Women are assholes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zr162OZ2Z0w

Bill Burr - On the epidemic of gold digging whores

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aY05HQHYvvA

[Silhouette]

It's almost like spam.

Almost?

^^^

[Tyrannus]

It's almost like spam.

Almost?

^^^

Ah, yes, because any views expressed that doesn't go along with the lines of the status quo must be trolling or spam.

[Silhouette]

It's almost like spam.

Almost?

^^^

Ah, yes, because any views expressed that doesn't go along with the lines of the status quo must be trolling or spam.

No, it's because 8 consecutive posts of links and repeating the same message as in your own OP (mostly without discursive prompt from others) is spam.

I don't give a fuck about how daring and contraversial you think you're being, the same would apply to anyone exhibiting your posting behaviour whether on this subject or any other.

Yes, there are hypocritical double standards in the whole gender inequality thing. That's your point in half a line of writing and it's all you needed.
Yes, you're simply just bad with women, which is why you need to condone the defaming of women as much as possible in order to preserve your ego.

They think you're creepy because you're too desperate around them (and judging of them, and probably self-conscious too), which you try to hold back, making you appear untrustworthy and false in your pretense of nice politeness. Your frustration and consequent demonisation of them just adds to your lack of faith in them, which gives them a lack of faith in you - you're digging your own grave.
The less comfortable and at ease you are, the less they are, and the less open you are about your intentions, the less they are. Not to say you should flat out admit all your depraved intentions, but it's a lot more attractive to women to openly flatter them with what you actually like about them - as long as you come across as sexually satisfied and thus fearless that you might put them off. Because genuinely sexually satisfied guys aren't worried about rejection, which helps them not be rejected. It's self-perpetuating. You, however, are in a vicious cycle going in the opposite direction and apparently you're not coping too well with it.
I'm trying to give you advice because it's not the content of your arguments (which are quite obviously based on something substantial even without spamming for emphasis) but your presentation of yourself that's really unsightly. I don't like having to put up with seeing the unsightly.

[Pandora]

a guide as to put up with modern narcissistic self centered women that comprise ninety five percent of the female population.

Such women are not born selfish and narcissistic. They usually become like that from experiences. Have you tried to look at it from a woman's perspective?
What about a cheating husband of a loyal, faithful wife and a mother of his children? What does a woman get for being innocent, loyal and proper?

[MagsJ]

Ty, please restrict your postings on this (and all related subject matter) to the current 6 threads you have in this forum, or they will be removed from public view.

Haven't we been here before, under your previous incarnation...

[Tyrannus]

Silhouette:
No, it's because 8 consecutive posts of links and repeating the same message as in your own OP (mostly without discursive prompt from others) is spam.

I don't give a fuck about how daring and contraversial you think you're being, the same would apply to anyone exhibiting your posting behaviour whether on this subject or any other.

Yes, there are hypocritical double standards in the whole gender inequality thing. That's your point in half a line of writing and it's all you needed.
Yes, you're simply just bad with women, which is why you need to condone the defaming of women as much as possible in order to preserve your ego.

They think you're creepy because you're too desperate around them (and judging of them, and probably self-conscious too), which you try to hold back, making you appear untrustworthy and false in your pretense of nice politeness. Your frustration and consequent demonisation of them just adds to your lack of faith in them, which gives them a lack of faith in you - you're digging your own grave.
The less comfortable and at ease you are, the less they are, and the less open you are about your intentions, the less they are. Not to say you should flat out admit all your depraved intentions, but it's a lot more attractive to women to openly flatter them with what you actually like about them - as long as you come across as sexually satisfied and thus fearless that you might put them off. Because genuinely sexually satisfied guys aren't worried about rejection, which helps them not be rejected. It's self-perpetuating. You, however, are in a vicious cycle going in the opposite direction and apparently you're not coping too well with it.
I'm trying to give you advice because it's not the content of your arguments (which are quite obviously based on something substantial even without spamming for emphasis) but your presentation of yourself that's really unsightly. I don't like having to put up with seeing the unsightly.

No, it's because 8 consecutive posts of links and repeating the same message as in your own OP (mostly without discursive prompt from others) is spam.

While lately I have been discussing the sexes a lot each created thread goes about addressing the subject from different angles. I'll explain how below.

If you can't understand that it isn't my fault. Don't accuse me of nonsense or spamming!

I don't give a fuck about how daring and contraversial you think you're being, the same would apply to anyone exhibiting your posting behaviour whether on this subject or any other.

It's my time to be Mr. grammatical teacher man. It's spelled controversial and behavior. Download a grammar computer program like the one I have.

Yes, there are hypocritical double standards in the whole gender inequality thing. That's your point in half a line of writing and it's all you needed.

Again, I'm addressing the subject of the sexes from different angles and thus that which can be defined as different subjects.

People here are just upset because I a conversing about things that they don't like.

Yes, you're simply just bad with women, which is why you need to condone the defaming of women as much as possible in order to preserve your ego.

Ah, yes, if you criticize women you must be bad with women! You must be a bad man! The whole timeless argument that women can do no malice or anything bad in the worshiping of their existential innocence bullshit.

They think you're creepy because you're too desperate around them (and judging of them, and probably self-conscious too), which you try to hold back, making you appear untrustworthy and false in your pretense of nice politeness. Your frustration and consequent demonisation of them just adds to your lack of faith in them, which gives them a lack of faith in you - you're digging your own grave.

What the fuck ever. A bunch of contrived bullshit from a mangina point of view.

The less comfortable and at ease you are, the less they are, and the less open you are about your intentions, the less they are. Not to say you should flat out admit all your depraved intentions, but it's a lot more attractive to women to openly flatter them with what you actually like about them - as long as you come across as sexually satisfied and thus fearless that you might put them off.

Typical mangina speak.

Because genuinely sexually satisfied guys aren't worried about rejection, which helps them not be rejected. It's self-perpetuating.

Satisfied men have all the money which is another psychological gimmick as to why women are attracted to men with lots of wealth. I'll explain this later in the thread.

You, however, are in a vicious cycle going in the opposite direction and apparently you're not coping too well with it.
I'm trying to give you advice because it's not the content of your arguments (which are quite obviously based on something substantial even without spamming for emphasis) but your presentation of yourself that's really unsightly. I don't like having to put up with seeing the unsightly.

Nobody forces you to read my threads. If you don't like them gtfo.

I'm not going to be censored by others just because they don't like my opinions. I'm going to speak my damn mind as I please.

[Tyrannus]

Ty, please restrict your postings on this (and all related subject matter) to the current 6 threads you have in this forum, or they will be removed from public view.

Haven't we been here before, under your previous incarnation...

Well, if it isn't our favorite resident ILP stasi showing up here. To what pleasure do we owe for your presence here?

Now you're going to tell me what I can and can't write about where I need special permission each time in the creation of threads?

I was going to write two more threads on the subject of women, but from different angles.

One was going to be entitled. "How men are more intelligent and creative than women."

The other one was going to be entitled. "Where are all the anarchist women?"

I was going to put them in the society section of the forum.

What, are you going to tell me I can't have my own independent reconnaissance to create threads now?

[Tyrannus]

a guide as to put up with modern narcissistic self centered women that comprise ninety five percent of the female population.

Such women are not born selfish and narcissistic. They usually become like that from experiences. Have you tried to look at it from a woman's perspective?
What about a cheating husband of a loyal, faithful wife and a mother of his children? What does a woman get for being innocent, loyal and proper?

Excuses, excuses, excuses.....

[Tyrannus]

Showing how my threads are not just mere spam as everybody here has been accusing me as of lately.

The thread entitled. "On masculinity and dealing with modern manipulative women" which is this thread right here deals primarily with male empowerment and how to deal well with modernized women in social interaction. I am also emphasizing it to be a thread discussing masculinity also.

The thread entitled. "Pornography, sex, and the female desire to be dominated. " is a thread discussing how women constantly seek submission to men and to be dominated by them.

The thread entitled. "The argument of women as innocent beings who can do no wrong." is a thread criticizing the argument that women can't be accused or blamed of anything especially in the context of the sexes and social interaction between them.

The thread entitled. "Criticizing politicized feminism." is a thread devoted to deconstructing and criticizing the ideology feminism along with pointing out all if its most obvious contradictions.

[Tyrannus]

In fact this thread was purely created for men so a majority of you interjecting stuff in this thread especially you females are off subject where I would ask all of you to stopping hijacking our thread here.

[gib]

Ty, we're not saying you can't voice your opinions, we're asking you to not make a mess while you're doing it. You may be addressing the issue of women/sexism/feminism/whatever from several different angles, but there is still an obvious common threads weaved throughout them all. What I was suggesting earlier was that you place them all into one overarching thread with a topic suitable to cover all these angles... something like "Ty's views on women". Post one topic at a time, let people hash it out, then when the dust settles, revive the thread with your next topic. It's a lot cleaner and more elegant.

I've done something similar with my Feminism and Sexism thread, and I recently started my "Fellow Americans, I ask you this..." thread and also a thread on India as you know. They're basically my own personal receptacles in which I dump all my baggage (or questions--I don't really have any baggage over Americans or Indians).

[Silhouette]

Don't accuse me of nonsense or spamming!

I didn't accuse you of nonsense, just spamming.

It's my time to be Mr. grammatical teacher man. It's spelled controversial and behavior. Download a grammar computer program like the one I have.

I don't need a grammar program, I am practically a master of grammar and spelling... though very very rarely there's a word that I don't realise I consistently mis-spell, such as controversial - thanks for correcting me. I take pride in perfection, so knowing this shit really gets my rocks off. "Behaviour", however, is the English from whence the Americanised (or "Americanized" in American English) version of "behavior" came. I speak proper English - you can probably adjust the settings of your program to U.K. English instead of "U.S. English", and you will see.

Again, I'm addressing the subject of the sexes from different angles and thus that which can be defined as different subjects.

People here are just upset because I a conversing about things that they don't like.

... as I said I don't give a fuck about what the subject matter just so happens to be. Your point is simple and I've even already agreed that it's not ill-founded. It's just not that much of an issue to me, personally. I almost never socialise if I can help it, especially not with either hypocritical yet self-righteous feminists or their male "mangina" counterparts. But when you repeatedly post, unprompted about the same simple thing that I summed up in half a line, linking over and over, that's spam. Plain and simple.

I know you think you're approaching it from different angles, but a calculating and collected mind would gather all of these angles together into one post in the simplest and most concise presentation as possible, researching and carefully considering all angles before even posting once. Once is all you need unless you're feeling inadequate about what you've written already.

Ah, yes, if you criticize women you must be bad with women! You must be a bad man! The whole timeless argument that women can no malice or anything bad in the worshiping of their existential innocence bullshit.

No, this is not my argument.
I don't care about you criticising (<- English spelling) women for such things as hypocritically pushing inequality under the name of equality. But your mentality goes way beyond rational criticism, there is active hatred brought on by massive frustration going on here, resulting in a hyper-aggressive demonisation (<- English spelling), which is way way over the top. If you were sexually satisfied, you would be entirely rational in pointing out that women frequently act out of malice and that they are far from innocent.

You're foolishly assuming that I'm against your point when I'm simply against your presentation of your point.

What the fuck ever. A bunch of contrived bullshit from a mangina point of view.

Typical mangina speak.

You're seeing my advice in terms of placating women at the expense of your masculinity, when it is quite the opposite. I am speaking of playing the system for your benefit, in order to achieve the maximum expression of your masculinity. Smears would no doubt agree with it because he lives the consequences of such approaches as I condone.

Satisfied men have all the money which is another psychological gimmick as to why women are attracted to men with lots of wealth. I'll explain this later in the thread.

Sexual satisfaction doesn't actually have as much of a correlation with wealth as you repeatedly insist, if you look at reality, which you aren't. You're just looking for excuses for your lack of satisfaction in this respect. I've never denied that wealth helps, but it's by no means the only means to getting laid. Based on reality.

Nobody forces you to read my threads. If you don't like them gtfo.

I'm not going to be censored by others just because they don't like my opinions. I'm going to speak my damn mind as I please.

Again, I'm not disliking the content of your posts, just your presentation. Please do speak your mind, but if you don't like my dislike of your spamming then nobody is forcing you do take any heed of me. Possibly I am censoring you by trying to get you to calm down your hysterical and reckless style, but you will never ever catch me censoring the actual points of your posts.

(Wow, case in point, in the time it's taken me to type this out, in trying to submit it, I'm shown that you've posted 4 more times about the same thing...)

[MagsJ]

One was going to be entitled. "How men are more intelligent and creative than women."

The other one was going to be entitled. "Where are all the anarchist women?"

What, are you going to tell me I can't have my own independent reconnaissance to create threads now?

Create away, but please ensure that you do not continue to duplicate topics as you have done here...