Understanding modern female psychology …
Press 1 for Love/Romance
Press 2 for Relationship
Press 3 for Marriage
Press 4 for Divorce Attorney
Please insert cash, credit, or debit now.
Are you sure you wish to cancel and be friend- zoned?
For any problems please call 1800 GO FUCK YOURSELF…
somebody left this comment on that article…
I have been saying this for years, there’s something in women where they literally can not handle not having their own way, even though she was going to leave anyways…but because she could not officially end it herself, then something deadly will happen, im surprised she didnt kill him first…where i am, the police do not believe women’s rape claims at all now because of so many proven to be false. the police use to put the “victim” in a hotel, showering them with caring services, therapy etc…they don’t do that no more…finally, the world is waking up a little bit…
We are witnessing the end of feminism, chivalry, and overall pussy pedestaling around the planet.
The tables are shifting and women are going to reap the consequences horribly.
Yup, they are getting desperate now. Trying to incorporate fashion into their movements, of course, they wouldn’t get involved in anything unless the attention is placed back towards themselves personally, it’s just another way of extending the egoistic cat walk experience and strategic marketing, masquerading as some kind of self expression of empowerment…this is proof that the disease of feminism is desperately trying to spread, pulling all aspects of life into it…trying to make itself more appealing, sexy, clean…preparing itself for something bigger…trying to reestablish it’s own order for more of an effective impact…let’s see how this goes…
It will fail especially without a large group of men to tax and fund itself with which feminists do all throughout government.
Men pay the taxes and feminists just foot the bill. Without a lot of men around who is going to pay for all these programs of theirs? Them?
Men in mass will not invest or participate in a system that is outwardly hostile to males and where they have no skin in the game.
In fact, more and more men themselves will become openly hostile to which a revolution of our own sex will prevail.
Men will also not bother protecting, saving, or investing in women if they are bent on being openly hostile to males.
Men are more than likely willing to leave them to their own doom or peril.
In other words, protect you from an armed mob of alley rapists sweetheart? Get butt raped, I don’t care…why should I care?
What if the whole idea behind all this is for hos to eventually have to make all the money and dudes eventually just stay at home and have fun and cook and load the dishwasher and spend all day sitting by the pool and shit?
You’re dreaming and living in a fantasy land.
The Western/Asian men are one of few entities capable of higher forms of ordering.
Most other organisms, such as females, children, dogs, etc. are much more chaotic in comparison.
Chaotic entities aren’t bad and evil, they are just less ordered and so have to be ordered and kept in check by others to keep them from ruining the society.
However, the Western men have decided they don’t want anymore the role of the ordering entity, which is to say high authority/responsibility and rule making, hoping it would lead to expectations of responsibility from them to lessen. This led to many of these, so called, ‘men’ to accept the first wave of feminism, or even the second, you know, all that equality bullshit. Of course, females, being chaotic entities, are exploitative and they sensed a weakness in these men, an emasculation, and now they are taking it to the extreme. Like a child that senses its parent is afraid to hit it, so it then misbehaves, or a dog that senses its master is weak, so the dog begins thinking he is the leader of the pack and begins behaving aggressively. So what happened is that men were stripped of their authority, women were granted the freedom to do almost whatever they please, but men are still denied such freedoms, and females now have higher expectations from males to be responsible than ever. iow, the dumb faggots who allowed females equality, vote, and all that, shot themselves, and future generations of men, in the foot
Ironically, most of these FAGTOWS don’t want a patriarchal system, either because they are stupid enough to buy into equality, so it would be evil, oppressive, blah blah, you know, or because they dislike that it would also make them responsible for women whom they have grown to despise. Well fuck it then FAGTOWS, enjoy women dominating you then, if that’s what you prefer.
Females are no more evil than children or dogs. They are cute and adorable if put in their place and dominated, and they can be great supportive elements. If let loose to do whatever they want, they become spoiled, entitled, aggressive, disruptive, brats cause they are chaotic entities in relation to men.
Arb you sound like this stuff makes you really upset. What if you were chilling at home all day with a ho’s credit card and tying her up at night?
New Research Proves That Women Were Gold Diggers As Far Back As The Stone Age
BY DAVID COVUCCI
Man, gold diggers. Fuck gold diggers. Right? Women who just use men for their money. Terrible people. Marrying rich to ensure a life of clothes and cars and a hot tub that you have a servant to clean is about the lowest thing a lady could do.
Marry for love. Not money.
But what if I told you you shouldn’t be mad? That gold digging gals weren’t working to ensure themselves a future of obscene wealth, but just a future, a life, the ability to reproduce and raise kids. What if I told you that gold digging was as old as time, an evolutionary behavior no less ingrained in women than the desire to spread our seed about and pick up a lot of hotties on Tinder is in men.
You’d probably scoff or something and say something like, “Bullshit, money was invented by the Medicis in 1610, so no woman could have those kinds of desires inherently inside her.”
Yea, I’d say, glossing over your Euro-centric rememberance of history. But before you needed money to survive–remember, there wasn’t always money–you needed food. Food was like money you could eat. What I’m trying to saying is that bitches back in the day married dudes who were good at farming, not investment banking like they do today. But it followed the same priniciple. From The Washington Post:
Researchers recently uncovered a sharp decline in genetic diversity in male lineages across the world during the Stone Age. The study’s authors hypothesized that material gains made through early agricultural success — a proxy for wealth — gave smaller groups of related men the reproductive upper hand for generations.
“Men who had more wealth and power might have had more to offer to women,” said co-author Melissa Wilson Sayres, an Arizona State University professor who studies sex-biased biology. “Their sons and grandsons could have been more successful in the same way.”
And it turns out that men who were rich boned A LOT in the Stone Age. Way more than men who were poor.
For every 17 women who passed on their DNA, researchers could find genetic evidence of only one male whose lineage stretched to modern times.
Of course. Why would you fuck a gross smelly caveman loser who also didn’t have food? Because he was cute: Spoiler: Everyone was butt fucking ugly in 6,000 BCE.
Meanwhile, people are using this news to crap on men folk, such as our (not) friends at Slate, as though the idea that the Bros who were best suited to survive in the times they lived in should have 1. Not reproduced and 2. Respected women’s wishes to leech off their land and food stuffs and not provide sex in return (desires we aren’t necessarily sure even existed).
“More to offer” is one way to think about it, but the cynic in me wonders how much choice women could really exercise in societies that were so strictly patriarchal that a few wealthy men shut all the other men out of the sexual marketplace so effectively.
That statement just made me barf. Sure, our currently backwards and rigid sexual norms can be traced back to the structure of society long ago, BUT THESE PEOPLE DIDN’T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK THEY WERE DOING. They didn’t know what choice is. Blaming these people for having a patriarchal society is no different than crapping on cavemen for not having the foresight to kill off the monkey population to preempt the AIDS epidemic.
Anyhoo, gold digging. It’s the world’s oldest profession, in that a profession is doing whatever you can to keep yourself alive, which in this case is ensuring you and your offspring access to food during the Stone Age.
TO THE OP: A good laugh. Thumbs up.
To ShieldMaiden; I don’t know if you are man, woman, or herm, but my take on it is this. Money based reproduction value is a form of nihilism and idiocy. Not all women are complete idiots, many are masculine and therefore rational in some way. However, the 100% woman, the woman who has no masculine qualities, is hysterical, like a clown. Clowns require much stimulation, but due to this lose attachment to stimulation and often become enlightened, content living in squalor.
So the real threat is the 75% woman, who is partially but not fully hysterical, therefore she is always reaching for stimulation but never self-aware enough to recognize her own attachment. She is the fuel of the fire of the world, worsening the human condition. She drives men to conspicuously consume, buy bigger houses, work like slaves, and pile up cars endlessly. She is Injustice and Greed itself.
The men are at work being feminine in mind and soul. Mentally most men are 75% women, mentally speaking. Therefore they see no reason why a women shouldn’t be attracted to their odious qualities, they themselves are attracted to their odious qualities.
The meat eating man is the most feminine of all, he is too masculine to be aware of his on feminine ego, and too feminine to be aware of ethics and morality, and so feminine that he aims to conform into society, but yet, not intouch with his feminine side to care about other beings. Men are the agents feminizing themselves…the rich man feminizes himself. He aims to please woman…a mediocre house is not big enough for him, he must spend and consume lest he incur the wrath of his wife. A playboy is no different, buying and purchasing more and more cars, not for himself, but for his women, if not for his women, for himself.
Men are the reason for their own feminization, their helpless submission to women, a subspecies which generally takes advice from them…men define the culture, men program women to view gas cars as “cooler” than electric cars, big mansions “cooler” than small houses, it is they who submit to the whims of women, rather than instructing women on what is right and is just, they succumb to whims of a child-like woman…men brought this idiocy on themselves, and subsequent generations have been paying the price, encountering volumes of men and women who worship materialism and are sexually attracted to materialism and nothing else…empty, child-like minds without any wisdom to be found.
Also old as civilization used to combat against gold diggers. I suggest a reintroduction within society. Cheeky bitches…
This study flies in the face of the extremely well known fact that the male population has more outliers than the female population, and thus more genetic diversity…
It may be tempting to look at this research and think it is true, but doesn’t even begin to explain what every study in social science shows.
There’s a missing variable here.
Pharma and psychiatry are run by men.
Courts, law enforcement run by men.
Most politicians, men.
Most corporate Boards, CEOs, men.
Yes, and they are fueled by the evil women who support them. Doesn’t it bother you that women claim they are full of goodness, yet routinely are caught giving love to pasty and evil politicians and bad people.? Women who claim they are animal rights activists, yet eat meat? Women who say they care about animals, yet discard and ignore friendships from people who want to help them? Does the fact that they are walking lies, does this not bother you??
A minority of men that makes slaves out of a majority of other men.
Most men have no power by comparison. Please try again.
There are more men in poverty than there are women.
How many wealthy women are there by comparison today?
Well… Women may not be the top earners, but this new economy of working women has found out that they make more more money with women as service job providers… And since the other jobs have gone foreign (manufacturing) men are sol in developed countries.
For now, yes…but when those western nations collapse however…