Moderator: MagsJ
Smears wrote:Authority Figure wrote:No one here will catch up.
Not that I've seen, at least.
I can count the number of people who have ever been on this board that 'get it,' and it can be done on one hand.
Not even me? Come on buddy....
Remember my first post here ever? Way back in the day? I was defending Dick Cheney. Good times man.
Authority Figure wrote:Since it's ostensible the system is not the same for everyone, and every incident in history, ever, confirms that, how about you explain how it's the same for everyone.
I am not sure what is encompassed by 'do better' but how do you see the fact that the children of the wealthy are vastly more likely to succeed than the children of the poor, at least as far as education, profession and wealth. Is this because the poor tend to try less hard?Smears wrote:The system is made of rules.
All people are created equal.
If some people do better than others, it's because they tried harder.
Moreno wrote:I am not sure what is encompassed by 'do better' but how do you see the fact that the children of the wealthy are vastly more likely to succeed than the children of the poor, at least as far as education, profession and wealth. Is this because the poor tend to try less hard?Smears wrote:The system is made of rules.
All people are created equal.
If some people do better than others, it's because they tried harder.
Smears wrote:Authority Figure wrote:Since it's ostensible the system is not the same for everyone, and every incident in history, ever, confirms that, how about you explain how it's the same for everyone.
The system is made of rules.
All people are created equal.
If some people do better than others, it's because they tried harder.
Everyone has the same odds of getting lucky.
Authority Figure wrote:I don't need to give an argument when 3 of the things you said are, in the objective, wrong. Worse: they could never be right.
If you want to believe that all systems have rules, though, then go ahead. We can kind of give that one to you.
25% is a failure mark, though.
Authority Figure wrote:Just stop.
The system is made of rules -- that is right, most of the time.
All people are created equal -- this fucking biblically wrong.
If some people do better than others, it's because they tried harder. -- wrong. All you would have to do is think about it for like 3 seconds or longer.
Everyone has the same odds of getting lucky. -- Nonsensical bullshit.
Do you actually have an argument here regarding those 3 points? I don't care about anything else you have to say.
At best it would be classist. But since my position is that resources affect outcomes it is precisely the opposite of classist.Smears wrote:Moreno wrote:I am not sure what is encompassed by 'do better' but how do you see the fact that the children of the wealthy are vastly more likely to succeed than the children of the poor, at least as far as education, profession and wealth. Is this because the poor tend to try less hard?Smears wrote:The system is made of rules.
All people are created equal.
If some people do better than others, it's because they tried harder.
Come on man, there are just as many rich kids who screw it us as there are poor kids who make it.
If you're saying the poor try just as hard, and that they're not getting as much done, you're basically saying that we're not all really equal, and that's like, racist or something.
yes, that's why I raised the issue of what 'doing better' meant, what the area was. I still think this holds on other areas also. I mean the kid who is sexually abused is going to have more trouble achieving certain social goals or will achieve them later or not at all than a kid who is not.Smears wrote:Yeah man I get what you're saying. But that's drawing a line between parents and kids in a way that I don't think is really fair. Life isn't all about money and how much you can get. And either kid will probably be able to make enough money to survive.
Sure, if 2012 turns out to be what some are predicting, then I am with you - the poor will have some advantages - some disadvantages also. But generally, most people have experienced relatively stable societies, enough so that material wealth does affect their success.You might say, that given the fact that either could survive if cut off from family money, that when the rich kids aren't, they're getting screwed out of learning survival skills, and because they know that, live lives of insecurity and fear whereas the poor kid gets the advantage, both practically and emotionally of having learned those hard facts about the world.
That wouldn't really hold for, say, 20 years ago. Those people did have advantages over those without cars and houses and it lasted. A depression hits the middle class hard and makes many of them poor and they are not used to it. On the other hand it throws a lot of the poor out on the streets.I think most of the people that Joker thinks are rich probably really aren't that rich, so even though they have bigger houses and cars, the've got bigger payments to make and when the cash flow stops they're just as screwed over a long enough period of time.
tentative wrote:The problem for those on the bottom rung of the economic ladder is that they give up trying. They see that the game is fixed and they usually haven't enough education to find any alternatives. They aren't coerced slaves, they put the chains on themselves.
Smears wrote:Authority Figure wrote:Just stop.
The system is made of rules -- that is right, most of the time.
All people are created equal -- this fucking biblically wrong.
If some people do better than others, it's because they tried harder. -- wrong. All you would have to do is think about it for like 3 seconds or longer.
Everyone has the same odds of getting lucky. -- Nonsensical bullshit.
Do you actually have an argument here regarding those 3 points? I don't care about anything else you have to say.
The constitution says we're all created equal. So does the civil rights act in some roundabout way. If you disagree, then you're an unamerican racist, and since I know you're a black dude in canada, and canada is pretty much just leeching off america, I gotta say I'm finding you a bit inconsistent here.
I thought about it, and like I said, barring retards and cripples, anyone can get a job and save money, anyone can do it man. Unless you're retarded or crippled.
How does everyone not have the same odds of getting lucky? I'll bet there's a big game theoretical proof for that shit. Search google man I'm sure it's out there.
How can you be so dismissive of opposing views, on a philosophy forum? You're like a facist man. I thought you were a pot smoking cool guy but now I'm not so sure.
Americans care about the constitution.
Or that it's ostensible.
You're saying that I"m not putting up any argument, but your whole argument is, "that's ostensibly false and it's ostensible too".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users