Trajicomic wrote:Men don't like dying and killing. But war is necessary. War is a fight over resources. But men do not live lavishly. Men live poor, usually.
Women cause war because women want to kill off other groups of women. War involves murder, often of other women and children. So if women really "hated war" and "wanted peace", then women would prevent them from happening. But they don't. Women are greedy and want lots of excess resources. Women want to drive their infants around in SUV, gas guzzling road tanks. Women are driven by instinct. Women want as much resources for her children as she can squeeze out of a man. Sometimes what we have is not enough. This is when women want men to go to war for them, for oil or gold in far away lands, so that men can steal these resources from other people, and give it to the women and the children.
Women are heartless and actually love war. They love the thought of men fighting and dying, for them. Stealing, raping, and killing, for them. Because women are simple beasts who need to "feed the greed". If women truly wanted to "end war", then they would 1: quit being so damn greedy, but they can't because that's their instinct, 2: quit feeling horny for violent, dominant men who kill other people, but they can't because that's their instinct, 3: keep their legs closed to soldiers and murderers, but they can't, for reason number 2.
Final word, women love soldiers. Women "love a man in uniform". Why? Because the military uniform signals that this man is a rapist, thief, and murderer. But the uniform is "covers" that all up. Women intuitively know what the uniform means though. And women get wet for this. Women want men to kill in their name.
If women were less greedy and malicious, then the world would be a better place with less war. The problem is, women are secret murderers who inspire their men to kill for them. War is women plotting the death of other women. That's what it's truly about.
I wouldn't be surprised if I get in trouble for speaking this TRUTH on a PHILOSOPHY forum. But whatever, I'm done here, enjoy.
Trajicomic wrote:Final word, women love soldiers. Women "love a man in uniform". Why? Because the military uniform signals that this man is a rapist, thief, and murderer. But the uniform is "covers" that all up. Women intuitively know what the uniform means though. And women get wet for this. Women want men to kill in their name.
Contra-Nietzsche wrote:It sounds like the woman hating eunuch from the photos to me.
Moreno wrote:Women cause war by being projection screens for men's hallucinations. Instead of dealing with their fears of sexual inadequacy or not being lovable, men make assumptions about what women really want and then structure society to reflect this as much as they can. Men have done incredible damage by avoiding feeling their fears, transforming the anxiety into both action and anger and seeing other men as rivals and blaming women for not loving them. This huge freight train of momentum gets built up in society and men rush away from their fears without remembering this is the impetus and then blame women for the horrible sense of panic underlying their machinations.
How dare women exist and be desirable!
Translation: I disagree.Trajicomic wrote:You're stuck in your selfish, egotistical delusions.
A restatement of what has already been stated, as if it is new information or offers support for already stated but unsupported statements.You have yet to see how men are desirable to women, and for which reasons. Killing, raping, and murdering, in a woman's name, is what wets the human female's crotch faster than a garden hose. Women love violence.....NOT when its directed at women and children themselves, but when it is directed at OTHER women and children. Women love taking sides. Women love having sides. Women use the male WtP for their own gain.
A restatement of what has already been stated, as if it is new information or offers support for already stated but unsupported statements.Kill a man, let him choke to death, suffocating on his own blood as he attempts to gargle his last words incoherently through blood bubbles and spittle, and watch the glee of the woman taking great pride and delight in his execution. I've seen it with my own eyes. I've lived this life before. I've been on both sides, conqueror and conquered. I've seen through both eyes. I've felt the adrenaline flowing with hatred and mad ecstasy, pure pleasure. I've felt the life fading from my consciousness, all the dreams of a lifetime fleeting out in a final burst of memory. I've taken lives. I've had my lives taken.
1) A restatement of what has already been stated, as if it is new information or offers support for already stated but unsupported statements. 2) A solipsistic denial of the disagreement.And I know, what women want. Women want violence, death, destruction, in their name! So don't you fucks dare tell me you "know" something when you don't know jack shit. If you truly disagreed with me, then you'd present some sort of rebuttal of SOME KIND. Instead you know every word I'm telling you is correct, is true, is "evil", and it is evil because it's true, and it's true because it's evil.
How is this happening - this using it against us - outside the confine's of your own mind?Truth is evil, sometimes. And many more pathetic minds here will never accept this absolute fact as a remote possibility. But your ignorance is my advantage. And I can use this knowledge against your romantic idealism. I can use your ignorance about life, facts, and truth, all against you.
[/quote]1) Tranlation: I am right. 2) Appeal to authority.Kriswest even admitted that I am true. And she knows best. So you're all wrong, to disagree with Kriswest. You're not intelligent enough to know how to compete with your naive, childish ideals.
Moreno wrote:Note: I am not saying you have not had such experiences, even the past life ones. I consider that very possible. I am not saying these things do not happen. But it is time for those with only a partial, fragmented perspective on the whole to stop pretending they are the central experts. It will not bring you solace continuing to think you are THE expert with the broadest and deepest perspective. You know that your perspective has not helped you, has not eased your suffering or lonliness and it has not worked for society as a whole to look at women this way. For a long time your opinion was the dominant one and it did not help. It only led to more pain and suffering. As long as you cling to your certainty and try not to notice your own fear and confusion, you will not have your pain eased one tiny bit.
It seems to me a key point in T's formula is that women control men, and completely, and men do not control women. I think that's just silly. These days a woman can buy a gun and equalize physical strength, but for most of our history, if we are to believe him, women have managed to control men and hurl them into the worst possible experiences - war - despite not being in positions of power in the Church, State or Business. So through the mere presence of their bloodlust and their manipulation of men - who must be both stupid and lacking in free will - women are the prime movers of history.Kriswest wrote::lol: Hon, i said you are partially right not all the way, just a couple of things does not make a whole.
It all boils down to nesting and genetic survival, not competing. We may be "civilized" but within us, our primal instincts still drive all people into actions and thoughts that are not civilized. In many ways our civilization has forced instincts to show up in abnormal ways.
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot]