I was impressed with our conversation on feminism and dysgenics that I was hoping we might collaberate together in making a thread on the subject.
I have a social economics theory in relation to how this dysgenics feminist program is carried out which in reality is just a false front for initiated state eugenics.
Thanks.
Thanks.
First of all I would like to say that I am sure that feminsm is definitely against women. Almost all of those who benefitted and benefit from feminism were and are men, and those few “women” who also benefitted and benefit from feminism were and are mostly masculinized, thus no real women. You may compare feminism and its women with the so-called “communistic socialism” and its so-called “proletariat”. This communistic proletariat did never have any power, at least less power than in the societies of the so-called class enemy, the so-called “capitalism”. Almost all of those who benefitted and benefit from communistic socialism were and are no proletarians, and those few “proletarians” who also benefitted and benefit from communistic socialism were and are mostly sponsored, thus no real proletarians.
The communistic oppressors of the proletarians merely want the proletarians to work for them and to love them as their good leaders. You can find the same situation on the feministic side. The feministic oppressors of the women merely want the women to work for them and to love them as their good leaders. Both communism (communistic socialism) and feminism (also genderism and similar isms) are merely different versions of the same totalitarianism. The goal of this totalitarianism is the total control of its people (about 99% of all humans) by several means (divide et imperea, panem et circenses, cynism, lies, fraud, violence, murder, wars, terror, terrorism, fear, torture, enslavement, racism, dysgenics, corruption, blackmail, extortion, indoctrination, indignation … and so on … and so on); so dysgenics is one of them.
Before we go into detail I would like to know what you exactly mean by “dysgenics feminist program” and by “initiated state eugenics”.
Moreover: machines are cheaper than humans; so - sooner or later - humans will not be needed anymore.
Agreed. Well writ post.
I’ll private message you either tonight or tomorrow for further details on this project.
Thanks.
All clear.
It’s cute that Arminius is flattered by your compliments!
Dysgenics also means “run away sexual selection” and implies eugenics… Duh!!!
Economics is the force for the transfer of resources … Duh!! So obviously economics is involved in run away sexual selection … Albeit oppositional game theory !!
I guess that you know that hypergamy as based on politics is “only” a modern phenomenon but is actually based on the fact that women tend to marry men of higher classes. To marry men of higher classes makes sense then, when it comes to motivate both men (to get higher positions) and women (to get men of higher positions). It becomes a problem then, when it becomes a political, institutional, publicly regulated, dictatoral matter - and that is the case in the so-called “Western World”.
You have a new private message.
Yes, hypergamy has always existed to some degree in human history but before recently it was thing for a small minority of women. As you said so aptly in your post it only became disruptive upon being institutionalized for all women including the lowest common denominator.
Yea.
We can start here, if you want:
