Most heterosexual don’t know lesbian hentia exists. Yes, guys generally like bisexual women, but it isn’t ideological, but more natural… females in many species will engage in lesbian.acts to show that they are in heat around a group of guys. Nothing brings the dick.swooping.down on them quicker… this by no means translates synergistically via category that if a guy likes two women making out, he has to accept drag queens and gay guys pulling a chain on one another, as that isn’t a evolutionary trait conductive to survival, nor is categorical recognition of larger supposed sets of taxonomical assumptions. In basic sexuality, I’m talking minus the paraphilia we learn by trying to reason it all, assimilating experiences, we are not usually gay. We get along well with the opposite sex, knowing they are different, don’t understand sex or how their privates work yet, yet we know something is special. What we see adults doing is a distant example of what a relationship is actually about, we see the windowdressings they allow us to see.
The whole point of reproduction is to make more people, if your not making more people, your off in your presumptions. That is a abstraction derived from the logic of my being born, and seeing others being born- society has to be kept at a replacement rate. All that other extra shit we add, however pleasurable or blissful it is, be it dressing in a animal costume while fucking, or having sex with holes in timestamps, isn’t valid if it for whatever reason keeps you from eventually reproducing.
It is why I’m much more tolerant of straight laced gay guys that drag queens, they aren’t digging a deeper hole for themselves. Suggests that there may be either a genetic or more likely, a birth defect resulting from embryo development that made them gay, such as why many gay guys have different finger lengths than straight men do… I don’t see a point in arguing against it in their cases, if they really are gay against their own choice, so be it. It is like demanding someone with Down Syndrome to knock it off… it is pointless.
But after this starts escalating, and becomes a antagonistic cultural fetish, then I know a lot more is at play than nature. It is natural to be aroused, even during a rape, and I understand psychological complexes can be built from a need to.survive it, but it is necessary for the health of the individual, the self, which certainly does exist, isn’t a mere construct, to reassert itself and take a hold of its own destiny. We should seek to survive our own traumas and not be controlled by them.
Last night I was breaking down Sonananda’s work on dualism/non-dualism, of the Kashmiri Shaivism variant, it comes very close to Colonel Boyd 's OODA Loop, but makes presumptions of when bliss occurs… it recognizes that the Dualistic/ Non-Dualistic mindset changes the centers of perceptive selfhood, and sees non-dualism as a means to negating traumatic pain in one mode of memories and perceptions, but doesn’t quite clamp it down into a unified system mentally of how we process rewards and punishments from sensory information. It comes close, but can’t quite articulate what is happening in paedophilia… though it does sorta offer a means for entangling oneself from it. I was thinking of Zoots last night while working through the variables. I also used later works like the Triskaloka (might not of spelled that correctly). Had a bunch of sources I collated from, no single link.
I support like the Cynics did a natural sexuality, one not needlessly dressed up in too many windowdressings. Sex simply put shouldn’t be so complicated that we all find it difficult to make babies. Sexual fetishes may be a necessity to adapt to stressful, awkward situations, and may linger long after the original cause has disassociated, but it is very important for the mind to assert its independence against these learned behaviors, and go back to the norms of sexual reproduction at its most simplified, a man and a woman. Women have a shorter timeframe to attract a mate, less than 20 years now, to make babies, so have adapted to better advertise themselves. Doesn’t mean they always do this. Guys don’t have to obsess as much, and women do it less and less once married with children. A simpler sexuality generally makes for a happier and closer one, as the two can more closely bond, man and woman is by nature designed cognitively to closely bond. Doesn’t mean they can’t indulge other areas, but they shouldn’t make a fetish larger than themselves either.
In maggot relationships, the fetish is larger than the individuals in it. Does he like you for being you, or because your dress in garments a certain way, and take a toilet plunger up your ass while high on esctacy? How psychologically deep can that go? Will the individual within ever be drawn out and encountered? Are the painful memories that caused all these complexes ever be addressed and healed? Unlikely, as it would mean the end of the fetish for the sake of the individual… this would be great if you were in a healthy relationship, but your not- your desired more for your kink than anything else. Such a sexuality is a open wound on the soul of mankind. It isn’t good for us, we obsess on unsound things.
Have you ever seen the pursuit of the fetishes, unreal obsession in the book Hypnerotomachia Poliphili? The movie inception is based on it.
The Strife of Love in a Dream/ Hypnerotomachia Poliphili
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypnero … _Poliphili
In that, the woman was a normal woman, but the man was obsessed with her. She kept fleeing him. Shows the fetished circle of how an acquired obsession carries itself out. On his case, wasn’t BDSM but articulation of poetics and language, he invented new languages to express himself, even through death.
