let me add my particular view/spin on this topic.
In addition to the variability of belong- ing to certain groups, added dimensions can be particularized by the common understanding of the way wearing different hats has come to be understood in terms of limits to perceive the preception of inauthentic existence. To the more liberal experience, based on praxis rather then on practice, such limits may not be properly understood.
The political right may support the prior rather then the later point of view, reducing the problem three fold into preceptions~perceptions of a more significant approach below any arising arguments surrounding an anomoulus theory within the argument.
In fact , the liberal point of view is basically contradictory in essence, in that interpretation , because it legitemizes a de-differentiation of cognitive clarity for the sake of more general understood perception, based on more basic levels of understanding.
There is a problem with such understanding, most of which revolve around precieved assumptions which have no credible basis, as on such which relate to various levels of economic tie-ins.
However, such assumptions , candy wrapped by sophistry, have to be modified by the most finely calibrated methods, to coincide with the political reality of various affiliations based on simplified levels
social reality.
De-marginalizing social reality too brusqually may create an effect similar to a diver emerging from a depth not appreciated. It will come back with a vengeance. The alpha male will be resented with the same force that necessity of submerging in the first place.
The absolute corruption of power may only be held credible until it becomes obvious that the emperor really is wearing scanty or clothes , if that.
Then the bottom line is the morphing of the hero, to that of the antihero.
The idea that short term gains are worth such longer term reversals, then may be seen as an opportunity to gain time and needing a submerged hat , that is hoped to be forgotten.