Yes, that is all he can do. In Aristotle’s Household Rules, he would of been relagated to the role between that of a woman or a slave, for it is debatable whether he truely possesses that capacity to rationalize and debate, for if he has it, he clearly lacks the authority to project it, and must rely on a sodomist to defend himself when he flees confrontations regarding hishis weak assertions. It is why you always see me say to Saiwelios not to rely on Fixed Cross to defend him- natully I am neither that much impressed or intimidated with Fixed Cross, but would like to see Sauwelios stand to a prolonged debate without breaking it off like a woman, fleeing into hysterics and hurt feelings. In all the years I’ve seen him post, he has never shown stamina save when copy-pasting other’s ideas. I don’t believe that qualifies as a philosopher.
I only bothered to post saying while I’ve abandoned using the word “Values” due to the meaningless mumbo-jumbo Fixed Cross and Sauwelios and the parade of Nietzscheans here have subjected it to (at this point the word effectively could mean anything, this isn’t the same as me saying there is no such thing as “Power” as power has a meaning, though deluded and false carried from Persian Boar Hinting cults to the present, it isn’t a valid scientific concentrate, in the same sense as Ether isn’t a physical state, or how I reject WTP as a partial attempt by Nietzsche to assert his own Categories against the Aristotelian & Stoic conceptions- it falls short, which is not Nietzsche’s full fault given it was a unfinished work… I reject them on their merits, in regard to how Value as a word is raped into metaphysical meaningless here, over the years, I’m just damn wary of the word now, no redefinition will ever reabilitate it given what those two idiots have done to it.)
I do however have to give a very, very, very rare compliment to a Nietzschean though, my main reason for posting. Magnus Anderson has made a attempt to digest the philosophical divide between Dualism and Non-Dualism, and came out in the Dualist School. I congratulate his sanity in this regard. I’m not impressed that he is hiding in the metaphysical remanants of Nietzsche’s thought, this will backfire as I’ve seen Nietzsche embrace both, and he never manages to die his ideas down to biological functions, the are floating in the air of metaphysics, abstractions, ideas, could mean anything in syllogism, beyond anatomical proof (I will just WTP a new frontal cortex bitches with this or that turn of phrase… gets tiring on these forums).
I’m a Cognitive Dualist myself. Search the website, you’ll see I’ve said that in the past. I’ve written a draft of a work called “Ontological Oceans” a while ago, was touching it up a bit yesterday. It has nothing to do with VO (utterly meaningless monkey babble that shit) and is more a attack on classical Non-Dualist Advaita, Monism, from a pans philosophical approach of Non-Dualist philosophers across history and the world, though most is original verse. I do attack self-proclaimed God-Men like Sauwelios and Dara Shihok (I don’t name Sauwelios by name, but anyone who knows me from here would know who) for being Monist…
Which is why I do congratulate you. You are the second person, after me, to of observed this. He does have a lot of these silly traits, he doesn’t go for the full Non-Dualism of the Astravakra Gita, he has read Heideggar but I think he remains largely ignorant of Shankara
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adi_Shankara
If you understand Heidegger, your first off, full of shit, his system isn’t one that conforms to the mind, I don’t see neuralsurgeons anywhere going off his theories prior to a operation, but if you “get” Heideggar in a sense, your prepared to get Shankara, and if you get Shankara, you are in a position to approach Heiddegar or Dogen, or the Chinese and Japanese Nietzscheans, who while being Nietzscheans, a group I utterly despise, I recognize as your movements strongest breed. Ive said this years ago too on this site, recall it was to Pezer if you care to do a search.
If your debating Dualism vs Non-Dualism, your debating Shankara, and just don’t know it. Given you are doing so now Magnus, I’m forced to conceded a new level of respect. You’ve unexpectedly advanced well ahead of the rest of them here. Your ready to expand into very advanced and complex Asian Nietzschean schools these misfits largely lack the intellectual apparatus for.
And yes, I’m still quite Catholic, quite Stoic, in being a Cognitive Dualist, I said “school” would be misleading. I’m not a full blown metaphysical egoist like you, I hold to the principles of anatomy like a stoic or modern naturalist is supposed to. My reactive reflexes can start anywhere, but the mind us clearly centralized in brain and nervous system. This has been suggested for 1500 years, I’m not willing to shake it off for a Prussian with delusions of grandure and a clear case of syphilis infecting his brain and nervous system.
I don’t give compliments often, and won’t likely offer another again, like it or reject it, know it is a very rare act, especially on this God forsaken idiot forum ran by throngs of faeries crying the hendonistic joys of Nietzsche. I came out of a war hating ideas and concepts I later saw Nietzsche embraced, and my anger is sound and justified, they here only know how to preach Nietzsche as a lazy form of hedonistic epicurianism. They speak of spirituality, show absolutely no evidence of it, beyond a willingness to use drugs and gay-sex as their dues ex machina to the claim, which I wouldn’t recognize as such, but it is all they have. I consider these slobs, especially these two, (Cezar, where are you Cezar, it should be three) as the two dumbest pieces of shit I have ever encountered in all my years as a philosopher. And Sauwelios is twice as dumb as Fixed Cross, which explains why I barely tolerate FC but never Sauwelios (Cezar is smarter than them both Combined, but my cat is smarter than him).
I have said “Dualist and Non-Dualist” for years around them. Sauwelios undoubtedly has a thread from 2005 where he blunders around terribly in trying to explain the concepts, but not getting it at all whatsoever, as his proof he understands it. He is Mr. Copypasta, no ideas or understanding of his own.
“Your Persona Non-Gratis now Mr. Ferguson on all my Fora!!!”… There Sauwelios, I said your stupid imbecile reply for you. Of course… Fixed Cross will come running to your defence, Trixie will make some wry comment after googling Dualism/Non-Dualism that doesn’t show much insight, and Magsj will post some pictures of her food and PM me that I am intimidating Sauwelios, and Iambigious will post some chickens and Nets cause I said Heideggar, and Mr. Reasonable will say something pointless, high as a kite- denying he is high, cause all he had was this and that… that’s how these threads go.
I would like to someday debate a knowledgeable Nietzschean, and you appear to be the first Magnus breaking the low intelligence barrier all the misfits here ate cast in. Still quite some way to go, don’t expect it now, just know I’ll be watching for that day to come. I will give you hell for it once you grow in enough depth to be worthy of opposing me. You’ve shown the first evidence I’ve seen on this site period here in this thread. I await eagerly, though it may still take years.