damn, women have no mercy!..
Filed under: Whores being whores… 
Theyre just not even trying to hide it now are they?..it’s all on public display too…it will never be forgotten.
the entitlement of alimony is a property law brought into existence by the same system that sanctions the origin of the family. next, this (patriarchal) system aggravates the tension between genders and their respective economic roles, finally to produce the movement we call ‘feminism’.
and yet everybody is scratching their heads wondering what’s happening. strange, that.
Poor Robin Williams got caught up in all this, maybe if he transitioned to Mrs doubt fire he could of avoided all this. …
Problem: Out of control hypergamic materialistic overly entitled women, sluts, and whores worldwide. Systematic worldwide fertility crisis, destruction of family, destruction of marriage, population decline, low birthrates, and the overall alienation of modern man.
Solution: Reinstall a strong patriarchal male dominated government and culture that reins in on these out of control women [cunts] worldwide under a set of harsh draconian laws that will stomp them out of existence.
Sidenotes: Marxist social utopian drivel or unicorns isn’t the answer.
When western nations economically, socially, politically, and existentially collapses it’s going to be open season on these bitches. 
We men will not forget how we’ve been treated from 1965 to present day, show them no fucking mercy or quarter. Punish them all, punish every single one of them by reining them in. 
[-o<
lol… and start the whole circus over again. i give you five hundred years before you’re right back where we are now. dutch chicks divorcing for alimony cuz they tryn to get paid cuz they broke.
Everybody is laughing about the disproportionate large single, sexless, and unmarried population of men now especially the overly entitled female cunt brigade but as western nations collapse one by one into total chaos or lawlessness these cunts are store for a huge shock when confronted by a large angry population of single horny men, western feminism will not survive and will shortly die afterwards. Women will be re-subjugated and thinking upon those prospects zero fucks are given by me concerning the aftermath.
The pendulum is going to swing back very brutally right onto the asses of western feminists everywhere.
Everybody jokes about female hypergamy, female cunts included, that is until they figure out that it will eventually on a long enough historical timeline be met with a violent brutal crackdown on women everywhere.
The supply of dicks and pussies via sexual intercourse concerning repopulation must flow.
Nope, once western feminism has been exposed for the self destructive fraud that it is men worldwide will make sure it is eradicated never to return ever again. We’ve discovered overtime that when women are allowed their independence they in turn move towards activities that destroy whole societies, nations, and civilizations.
Once western feminism is destroyed and in reality it pretty much is destroying itself, the next few hundred years will be one where the Jack boot is firmly placed on women’s necks in order to make sure it never returns again.
and here our post-apocalyptic paths would cross, old friend, because it would be my mission to protect the hotties from you and your band of lawless ruffians.
Good luck with that white knight. There is more single men than there are those married or in relationships, you’ll lose against greater superior numbers. Volume, numbers, or density always wins every single time.
Problem—>Reaction ---->Solution.
The, origin, of the family, what?
While the family adapts to the sociopolitical, economic and technological system of the day, and in turn, the system adapts to the family, the family itself has no origin, it’s primordial.
oops my bad i meant to say something like ‘paring marriages’ but i forgot to speak engelish.
so you see what we gotta do, glooms. we need to restructure the whole thing or the feminists might very well destroy us. paring marriages in the private sector have to go because that old-ass shit is what’s causing this epidemic.
Firstly, what households is Engels talking about here?
The households that existed right before the advent of capitalism in Europe, or further back and abroad?
Because households weren’t monolithic before capitalism, there were different ways of organizing them.
Secondly, capitalism didn’t invent private property.
Every society had a mix of private and public property, and of hierarchy and heterachy.
Capitalism extolled private, but in practice it too was a mix.
Families always tended to look out for themselves and theirs first, and they always will, and there’s nothing wrong with that, in fact it’s normal, natural and healthy.
Before capitalism, families tended to be extensive, after capitalism, nuclear.
Within families, property tended to be shared, but between families, hoarded.
And it’s not now?
A mom with kids is protected and provided for, either by her husband and/or the state, whether she stays with or divorces him.
I’m not exactly sure how things were in the 19th century, but today, we don’t have a patriarchal family, fathers/husbands and/or the state owe mothers/wives provisions, she doesn’t have to sell herself into servitude or slavery for them, if he withholds them from her she can take half or more of his.
But even if she did have to sell herself into servitude for them, then that would be fair, if men are giving women something, it’s only fair they’re getting something about equal in return i.e. baths, massages, blowjobs, dinner, etcetera.
The moment mothers/wives stop providing these services for or divorce fathers/husbands to live on their own or off government, they’re not entitled to anything from them.
No, it makes him a slave to his wife.
He is obliged to protect and provide for her, but she’s not obliged to him for anything.
She doesn’t even have to stay with him or look after their kids, she can divorce him, let him keep the kids or give them up for adoption, and still take much or most of his money.
And of course she has the sole right to abort their kids (if it’s a woman’s right to choose whether their unborn children live or die, then it’s a man’s right to choose whether he’s responsible for them or not), and most of the time she gets custody even when custody is sought by both her and him.
What Engels is advocating for here is the complete enslavement of man to his wife.
He is a female supremacist.
You are a misandrist, and you are trying to destroy the family, unbeknownst to you or not.
The problem with Marxists is that they can’t or just don’t understand biological inheritance. They instead trivialize everything under social constructs like a magical wand trying to deconstruct everything.
Ironically the social constructs they try to deconstruct everything with is just another extension of biological inheritance. Biological extensions determine social constructs.
Of course this is what we can expect from a naive social utopian model like Marxism.
Promethean, are you saying the state should pay mothers money to cover the costs of taking care of their children and themselves, even if they and/or the fathers can cover the costs themselves?
Right, they believe virtually all differences, particularly differences in ability, empathy and sympathy, between individuals, families and races can be explained by (early) nurturing and mimetics rather than nature and genetics.
They believe we’re all equally valuable and that at our core, underneath the (early) nurturing and mimetics, equally capable and conscientious.
The difference between national socialists on the one hand and Marxist socialists on the other is we just want what we see as a fairer and more balanced economic hierarchy, whereas they want to eliminate hierarchy altogether.
They want to eliminate the family, culture and race by polyamory, miscemimation and miscegenation, whereas we want to preserve them.
They want to eliminate the family by the state paying mothers (and fathers, I’m sure many of them want to do away with the notion of fathers altogether) just to have, raise and rear kids, even if mothers (and fathers) can pay for them themselves.
They want to eliminate gender, sex and even species by transgenderism, transsexualism, transhumanism and human-animal hybridization.
Yea, funny that.
Too right.