Authority Figure wrote:Lol
You can't do it.
Moderator: Flannel Jesus
Authority Figure wrote:Lol
James L Walker wrote:Stoic Guardian wrote:James L Walker wrote:I would like to resurrect the art of highway robbery from horseback.
I call Shotgun! (Do you get what i'm going for here? If not look up the origin of the phrase.)
Sorry kid, I work alone. It is safer that way.
Pezer wrote:No viable alternative source of energy exists today to replace petroleum. As I said, nuclear could have been a way, but they had a couple of catastrophic spills in the experimental stages and pussied out.
Sun? Wind? Not with the technology we have today. Obviously they are sufficient to fuel a home and a car (maybe not even), but Joker is talking about mass production and transportation of goods and people. That you cannot do with anything but petroleum in today's world.
Unless the engineers can come up with something new.
Stoic:
No... I meant i'd be an armed guard of the caravans youd try to rob.

d63 wrote:This is exactly why we need to be looking at population control. We either do it through attrition or through more catastrophic means.
Personally, and this is not to go to the sexist extreme that James will (James being a respected peer), I think one of first things we need to do is take control of birth control away from women. They are just too susceptible to baby fever. We need to find a way to easily and cheaply reverse vasectomies and have every pubescent boy have a vasectomy and have his sperm saved in a bank to be used at his discretion. Once men have a choice in the matter, that is outside of their sexual drive, I'm almost certain there would far more reservation about childbirth.
Plus that, it will give men a little more leverage in the war between the sexes.
James L Walker wrote:Stoic, what do the pictures have to do with the thread subject?
Stoic Guardian wrote:James L Walker wrote:Stoic, what do the pictures have to do with the thread subject?
Vey little.
Pezer wrote:Sorry, the second one was me... It looked like fun.
d63 wrote:It's not like the more totalitarian approach of China.
Pezer wrote:d63 wrote:It's not like the more totalitarian approach of China.
No, but the measures you are calling for still require the existance of a powerful central government... which is technical language for fascist pigs.
Return to Science, Technology, and Math
Users browsing this forum: No registered users