Has the Internet had its day?

What is called “technology”, whether hardware, software, or wetware is pre-formulated answers to problems that are distributed to morons so they can more easily and greatly accomplish their moronic passions. And because they are designed to best suit morons, morons end up have greater power and influence throughout society in every field. Those who were capable of living by their own wits no longer have a place in the politics, science, religion, government, or the world.

Thus your theme is quite accurate.
I gave up making machines smarter when I realized what it takes to make people smarter.
As obnoxious as people can be, I still prefer living people to a society of drones.

…and I’m guessing that you already knew that “Armin” originally meant “Great/High Man” in its original German dialect. :sunglasses:

I didn’t want to go in precise details. Anyway there is not necessarily a contradiction between cyborgs and remnants or loss of human procreation (descendants, children).

…and you might want to chk your PMs. :sunglasses:

The Internet, Fantasia, Atreju, and The Never Ending Story.

Yes and a little bit no - because of the fact that nobody really knows where the meaning of “Arminius” comes from - except the fact that the historical, real man named (by the Romans!) “Arminius” was a German, namely an ancient German Cheruscan. And one more historical fact is important: Arminius throw out the ancient Romans - not out from the whole Germany (a part of Germany was conquered by the Romans under Caesar and called Germania Superior and Germania Inferior) but from the free Germany, which was called Germania Magna or Germania Libera. And this historical fact ist what I mean when I say: defending freedom (defnding - of course - against the CIVILIZED BARBARISM!). The CIVILIZATION is the true BARBARISM as the history of ancient Romans and Germans shows us.

The Cherusci lived where I was born and growing up - an additional reason for me to choose this name (pseudonym or nickanme). The main reason is the historical fact of the fight against the CIVILIZED BARABRISM, in that case: the ROMAN BARBARISM.

Armin is just the Latinized spelling for Hermann or “Hier-Man” or “Higher Man”.

I do not intend to open a new thread (e.g.: “Comparing internet and Roman bread-and-games-civilization”), but I intend to illustrate what can be learned from the comparison in general and in particular.

At least that is the official lore (tradition), yes (so: you are right).

Has the internet had its day?

Maybe that there will be a „»internetian« colosseum“ - otherwise there is no constructive future for the internet because we’ve got many comparisons and analogies, for example: every kind of bread-and-games-techniques or (as an occidental not-old-example) telephone, radio, television in their significance for the behaviour of the people („humans“) and their relationship to each other. All this shows us the „goal“.

In short: the internet has and will have no harmonious future.

Well, it isn’t just lore or tradition. You can tell merely from the phonetics. The German accented sound from “her” (or “hier”) sounds like “air” to the Romans. So to the Romans and English that high German dialect gets spelled differently to reflect the sound. The German “Hier” is merely remnants of the tradesman’s “higher” (in English).

It is being arranged to be segregated into social regions, more controllable. Society is run entirely by reputations and thus by communication. Only an honest government can allow free speech.

Yes, that’s right, but it got „spelled differently“ only to the Romans, not to the English because the English at that time were Germans (at home in the north-west of Germany).
You know much about linguistics (especially phonetics). Well done!

Yes, but what would “an honest government” be, if the basic for government is only lie?

Although the English were more originally the Anglish in western Germana (the Latin word for “Land of small tribes” from which we got the word “germ”), there was no actual “Germany” for many years. None of the Germanic tribes referred to themselves as “Germans”.

And the Anglish were stationed as the “Western Corner of the World” by Moses to be the “Angels”, “messengers of god” establishing the trade language, now called “English”. And when the Americas were discovered, the “Angels” were stationed again to the far West to become “Los Angeles” or “The Angels” assigned to be the messengers in the new form of films, “Hollywood”.

The world has been more designed and connected than the masses have ever known for centuries. Every major nation and event in the world is only there by ancient design, slightly modified during the “Enlightenment Years” to speed things up a bit.

The Aristocracy and Royal Families are merely Apes with secrets.

The Internet is no different, as you have pointed out.

Los Angeles did get its name from the Spanish conquerors. The story of the “Angels” seems to be a retrospectively constructed old-testament-story.

Interesting! It fits to the retrospectively constructed old-testament-story (=> Jewish story) beacuse that “Angels” of “Hollywood” were / are (mostly) Jews.

But now: :smiley: :blush: [-o< :smiley:

Please some more words, because that’s the topic here.

The English lived - as Angeln („Angels“) and as Sachsen („Saxons“) - in the north-west of Germany, namely in a part, which is called Altsachsen or Niedersachsen (Nether Saxony = Lower Saxony and Netherlands), and in a part, which is called Angeln (a part of Schleswig-Holstein). The land which was called Germania by the Latins was probably the „»land of small tribes« from which we got the word »germ«“, as you have said, but nevertheless: There was an actual Germany at that time, when this land was called Germania by the Latins, because the Germans referred to themselves as a community of fate, although they often (which also means: not at any time) were at odds with themselves. So the Germans referred to themselves sometimes as Germans and sometimes not - as they still do.

Altsachsen = Old Saxony

Just as the globalist economics, politics, technology, science, art etc. already arrived in dictatorship or will arrive soon, so it is and will be with the internet too.

And guess who owns ALL of the major film making companies in Hollywood.
The world is just a script written on the pages of time.

That story, like many things on the internet, keeps changing. I imagine that they will settle on a “truth” for all to “know” one day to reflect their chosen advantage.

There are two kinds of “firewalls” used in the world throughout history. One thing is protected against possible invaders (by its firewall) while possible invaders are individually isolated and incapacitated, a different kind of firewall adhered to the “fire”.

Socialist societies are governed strictly by reputations and thus to govern the world, the ability to set, change, and/or maintain reputations must be established and maintained. That means that they cannot have people freely sending messages to the “wrong people” and saying the “wrong things”. The “Wikileaks” story is used as incentive to take necessary absolute control over the internet, else “our” good people might get hurt. Obama has already established that the “internet belongs to the President to be used as he sees fit”.

People only imagine that what they say on the internet is really getting “out there”. There are a variety of ways to ensure that nothing really gets very far at all. But it must be maintained to appear as though words are freely “viral”, just as it must be maintained that people can freely start a business and become rich or win the lottery. And all for the same reason, “wool over their eyes”.

What do you exactly mean with “that story”? Which reference does the word “that” have in your text (or context?) ?