Can a discussion become future technology?

In all of humanity’s history, can any discussion become future technology? Say technology is a motor engine, or a transmitter, can human discussions become the equivalent of said devices in the future?

They always have been in the past.

How?

I have to assume that you are American, else you would immediately recognize that entire priority and “technology” of the “Propaganda Ministry” (aka “American Media”).

The “technology” concerning the manipulation of the population has been under development for thousands of years and is the very foundation of Judaism which then spawned Christianity and Muhammadanism.

How you say what you say, to whom, to what degree of emphasis, in what situation, (aka “the discussion”) are the thoughts concerning the “technical details” (the “technology”) of populous manipulation and “discussion”. Your presentation has been the fundamental concern of all philosophies and religions from day 1.

So your idea of “future” potentials, is a bit naive.

How?
[/quote]
I have to assume that you are American, else you would immediately recognize that entire priority and “technology” of the “Propaganda Ministry” (aka “American Media”).

The “technology” concerning the manipulation of the population has been under development for thousands of years and is the very foundation of Judaism which then spawned Christianity and Muhammadanism.

How you say what you say, to whom, to what degree of emphasis, in what situation, (aka “the discussion”) are the thoughts concerning the “technical details” (the “technology”) of populous manipulation and “discussion”. Your presentation has been the fundamental concern of all philosophies and religions from day 1.

So your idea of “future” potentials, is a bit naive.
[/quote]
What’s a specific example of what you’re referring to, about manipulations of the population?

:confused:
What are you currently thinking?

  • that would be one example.

It is harder to find a thought that isn’t.
[list]* There are no conspiracies. All assassinations are lone wolves.
[*]All terrorists are Iranian.

  • The USA is a democratic nation.
  • No one knows what causes cancer.
  • All diseases are basically due to genetic weakness.
  • Global Socialism is the loving way.
  • Christianity is evil.
  • All evil is due to white males.
  • Capitalism is the method of modern day evil.
  • Women are smarter and more equal than men, yet abused by them.
  • Jews are innocent of all things and wise in all ways.
  • Black males have huge penises and white women yearn for it.
  • Suicide is best for white males.
  • Technology is progress.
  • Artificial intelligence is the hope for the future.
  • Old people are the source of all foolishness.
  • Government surveillance and intervention is the only means for security.
    .
    .
    .
    [/*:m][/list:u]
    …pick one. :icon-rolleyes:

Thank you. In reality, people can experience all sorts of thoughts, but the human need of status and greed means the censorship of that reality. The list will apply in some cases, but in most people’s minds I imagine the fallacy of the list is known of - or at least the idea that such a list is meant to represent fallacy, whereas in actuality some of those ideas are true (socialism is good).

What I actually mean is a social circle discussion; say a group of friends in a house, in LA, or a discussion between two people on an airplane. Other examples can be a discussion between students during a university lecture, or a discussion between a UK Prime Minister and their civil servants, or a discussion in a hotel room.
Can any discussion in any house in any country on the planet become the equivalent of a torch, or a motor engine, or a lawnmower?

The discussions between people are like the electric current in a wire as they drive the people to create and push the lawn mower. Control that current and you control their motor-vation. With more complex circuitry (gated discussions), more complex behaviors can be arranged concerning an entire society. Thus the “social technology” is discussion control (aka “propaganda”).

All discussions need separation. Is separation the means of power?

Separation is a means for manipulation and manipulation is a means for power.

If all discussions on the planet mirrored discussions on ILP, would you agree that neither NASA, news media, society and politics would exist?