When the numerator is zero and the denominator is a positive integer the answer is infinity not zero
Even where the denominator is also zero the answer can still be infinity as well as zero and also one
31/2 = 31 divided into 2 pieces. - each piece = 15.5, [2 * 15.5 = 31]
31/0 = 31 divided into 0 pieces. - makes no sense and thus = “undefined” (not “infinity”), [0 * ?nothing? = 31]
0/31 = 0 divided into 31 pieces - each piece is still zero, [31 * 0 = 0]
0/0 = 0 divided into 0 pieces - still makes no sense because it is “indeterminate”, [0 * ?anything? = 0]
Well … someone didn’t.
In hyperreal notation, those same numbers can be resolved because more information is within the notation. Each “0” has a degree of zero that it is, not merely an ambiguous nothing.
That is up to Phyllo to ask. He is making a asserting similar to mine, I want to cross examine it. Cross examining you doesn’t get me into a place of potentially grasping my own position better, I already know your wrong, what matters now is the specifics in how Phyllo is right.
This is a presumption One is always monistic. One is a Dyad is 2 and 1 simultaneously, but not three as the two states are presumptions of states of being and not actuality, so are not mutually in play upon the other simultaneously, by themselves.