Kompromat

It must be hard for both of you living in precisely the wrong country so many years after having that would be remotely possible.

Still, what always intrigues me about political commitments of this sort is less the arguments that folks make in defending them and more the sequence of variables in their lives that predisposed them to champion them in the first place.

And not something else.

Here [pertaining to the OP] there are facts that either will or will not see the light of day regarding the actual existential relationship between Trump and Putin. Something did happen. And in a particular order. But what? How close will Mueller and others come to sorting it all out?

But our reaction to the facts is considerably more convoluted. That’s the part [for me] that gets all tangled up in “I” as an ever shifting and evolving existential contraption going forward in a world [labyrinthian at times] of contingency chance and change. There’s just no way of predicting what you will think and feel a week, a month, a year from now.

The facts will stay the same. But our reaction to the accumulating facts may not.

That’s why an objectivist frame of mind is so tempting. Once you zero in on right and wrong from a particular moral and political zeitgeist, any particular means and ends [as they relate to interpreting the facts] will be constantly shifting “in your head” in order to sustain the most comforting and consoling psychological zeitgeist.

Iambiguous, for somebody that is a nihilist you sure seem to be obsessed with what is right, wrong, and egalitarian, dare we say you’re not as neutral or skeptical as you claim to really be?

You obviously vote liberal, you’re slipping…

Can we call you a fraud of a nihilist yet? No, too soon?

We’re going to obliterate whiteness all throughout the west destroying the European Caucasian wherever they exist. There will be no insurrection, defiance, push-back, separatism, or rebellion, what can go wrong? Nothing I tell you, the plan is perfect!

We Jews will formalize a world government because as God’s destiny being fulfilled as the chosen we’re destined to rule the entire planet and with our genocide of the Palestinian people as you can see we’ll stop at nothing to do so. The end justifies the means and nothing is beyond our abilities in achieving that end.

Kushner is partly under attack for the current flareup in the Middle East.
Instead of looking at causes, which hinges on reverse thinking sandwiched on doubtful effects to their causal claims, take historical signposts of causal certainty in terms of historic unaffected guidelines. They are not equivocal at all , and be at in mind they are not fodder to connect causes and their apparent outcomes, but merely events catalogued as unaffected historical records. Can one think of some?
On the forefront is the question of Arab unity as Arab Brotherhood.

Much is slung about this supposed societal feature of Middle Eastern real-social-politic, but is this really
a’ real’ real of most current descriptions of what really is going on? Is not the social unsophistication more to the point where regionalism and tribalism are more to the point?

Historically the facts bear this out. Jordan is the most convincing in an apparently undisguised manner in which the King there, a U.S. friend, refused to open up Trans-Jordan to Palestinian immigration there. The factionalism between the Shia and the Sunnies are a perpetual mobile of unsorted and inconclusive proof of un- certain claims to land and sovereignty between those groups as well.

The idea that these sorts of conflicts among unfriendly tribes, giving hate toward a common enemy, again, gives rise to very basic social -psychological defensive posture, again on a primary level.

Not accounting for such, but bypassing them, makes the reality sandwich extremely thin, disguised in populist terms, and perhaps giving a deliberately oblique view to the shakers, the intelligencia and the movers of those countries a bad taste of exemplarism, as hypocritical and self serving in those countries. Further, disociating a good and bad will of the West’s intentions.

Nah, who will you hire as pesonal assistents? And how will your Nuremburg Laws work? I mean the ones to determine race.

Either the facade parody Jew or the underlying separatist Joker…

What will either of you do with all the mixed race people? Adoptees? Interracial marriages? Professional partnerships?

You don’t want to inhibit the freedom of Jews or whites-

Well, at least your not national socialist, that has a ten year max duration and leads to the destruction of many of your own race.

The Kalergi Plan, we need to take out the white Europeans because they’re the only opposition to take us on in competition or opposing us. Our program against whiteness is progressing very well since the 1960’s.

All non Jews make up for a good servile population and we’re not really worried about them.

And the Nuremberg Laws when separating?

What about them?

It is great that we destroyed national socialism in Europe during World War II, it was the only political threat against us as it collectivized the Europeans in a form of organization that threatened our power or influence everywhere.

Being that we control capitalism and marxism we’ve essentially neutered or neutralized European whites where if they keep following both politics they’ll be within our realm of control.

And the Nuremberg Laws when separating?
[/quote]
What about them?
[/quote]
Well, you gotta figure out in your real and then fake Jewish separatisms how to deal with all the boundary cases, grey areas and close relations between races. IOW your own Nuremberg Laws.

Now you’re not making any sense at all.

Wendy has claimed you are a separatist, there are gray areas, hence the Nuremberg laws.

Nuremberg was pretty black and white. I’m unable to follow your rhetoric here.

This is a paradigm of how grey areas can give rise uncertainty, defeating deontological focus, used referentially as if it made some kind of objective sense possible.
A reductive gesture to a black and white argument failing a compromising situation, its a dilusive attempt to bring back to solvency that which can not again appear in concentrated forms.

Literally, Nuremberg could never due justice on what went on in those concentrated concentration camps.
They were not existential contraptions they were not merely metaphors of illness, they were epochs that prevented clarity in movement from sterile nihilism forwards or backwards

They literally and figuratively landed into a definitive black hole , from which escape was not possible or even conceivable.

Both: anti-semite and jew were caught in an inescapable paradoxical situation.

Ref: Sartre, ‘Reflexion sur question juive’.(in broad context) ed.1946 Edition Morihien

I am so glad the Soviets discovered those concentration camps before anybody else including the Americans. Thankfully the Bolsheviks were on our side…

Well, exactly. It was to get rid of gray areas.
The N laws laid out who was considered Jewish - amongst other things it did. Wendy says you are she are racial separatists. What will your parallel to the Nuremberg laws be. IOW how will you separate? What percentages of genes? What about adopted kids of other races? etc.

I fail to see the importance of the comparison.