Proof of God (for Sâmkhya)

Everything is limited in understanding.
Understanding is not limited.
‘God’ understands everything.

Dunamis

First, let’s just say that “Everything” is actually “everything minus God,” then we can talk about some problems.

  1. “Understanding is not limited” has no justification. Chaos, the butterfly effect, and such are all laws that say we cannot know everything, and if they are right, then “understanding” is limited.

  2. For this to be a “proof of God”, not a “proof of what God is”, you have to assume that something understands everything, which does not need to be the case.

Sorry, saw the time, got to get to work.