Free Thinker,
there aren’t commands in my posts. I have just suggested you to read one of Darwin’s biographies, so that you can find out for yourself that he was really an agnostic, at least by the end of his life.
And I am so interested in learning the truth as you (if this word does have a sense), but since freedom is my main concern, I don’t like to impose my opinions on anyone, so as long as the religious people live me in peace (what they aren’t inclined to do most of the time, of course), I live them in peace too.
I’m not religious in any sense of this word. I also find fanaticism, intolerance and those sets of “dos” and “don’ts” abominable and dangerous to a healthy mind, so I keep away from religion. But I haven’t the right to tell people to do the same, since I am to respect their choices as they have to respect mine (if they’re reasonable, at least).
Dan,
mmmm…thanks. I think we can come into terms regarding some of your opinions, but this extreme anti-religionism seems to me a bit…childish.
When you talk about religion, you’re not only talking about Christianity, fanatics, bigotry, close-mindedness, Inquisistion, “creationism” and sets of dos and don’ts. You are also talking about one of the main concerns of human life, of most human beings at least: the meaning and purpose of human life.
You may find mere Christianity foolish, but this religion gives comfort and peace to most people who aren’t able to enjoy life like you do, mos people who haven’t anything but their faith.
The same applies to Muslims.
More, when you try to say that all religions are dangerous and a “waste” of time, you forget that many religions give science and education all the support they need. You also forget religions like Bouddhism, for instance. Do you think anything we can create can even be compared to the profoundity and beauty of Bouddhism?
You think that you can disprove a faith by using reason, but that’s a bit naïve, since religionists claim that their faith is something which is beyone mere reason, although many oth them claim that the existence of god can be proved with mere reason. That’s controversial and yet not so stupid as it may seem. Read Kant and Leibniz for instance.
Again, Dan, the sole purpose of those messages of mine was to show you that things are not so simple and easy as you may think they are. People need religion. People need to believe in something, as you do. You do believe science can make our lives more confortable and pleasant, but you are utterly incapable of proving that it can offer us a purpose. You may argue: Of course it can’t give us a purpose, it can only be used as a tool to find out the truth!. But since science isn’t based upon the premise that everything has an absolute meaning, that the universe is not there by chance, that its intelligibity has some meaning, how can we ever be able to find out any kind of truth? I don’t mean facts such as Evolution, sexual instincts and the natural need to eat and drink, for instance. I mean a sort of truth which could really be applied to all human beings, to all times, and which could really make us live meaningful lives, what is really not the case with the handy “truths” we have.
Think about it.