The unity.

“You cannot shelter theology from science, or science from theology;
nor can you shelter either one from metaphysics, or metaphysics from either one of them.
There is no shortcut to the truth.”
– Alfred North Whitehead, Religion in the Making .


Albert Einstein once remarked:
“The greatest trouble in the world is the idea of a personal God!”


“What is your flash, Khayyam?
Tent where for overnight’s stop,
As a wandering shah, the spirit did a stop”.
/ Omar al-Khayyam. /


The doctrine of a personal God could never be refuted by science.

The laws of physics and mathematics in the different countries of the world
are identical, but religions - different. Why?
Because the religion is not proved by the laws of physics and mathematics.
And unless it is possible?
In my book and on a site I approve that it is possible.
* * *
Many of physics consider, that: " The Physics is first of all Vacuum. "
P. Dirac wrote:
" Тhe problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem worth now before physics.
Really, if you can’t correctly describe vacuum,
how is it possible to expect for the correct description anything more complex? ".
It is completely correct.
In Vacuum physics have groped true and the
condition of infinite / eternal Vacuum characterized
with one simple physical parameter T=0K.
The philosophy of science begins from T=0K .
The physics begins from T=0K.
The religion begins from T=0K .
The origin of Existence begins from T=0K .


If you have time and desire, I ask you to visit my site:
socratus.com
Thanks.
Israel Sadovnik .
Socratus.

True religion has to be proven by mathematics. One could say there has always been an underground ‘religion’ as such, but the masses have never been ready for it. But that’s OK. Even ‘Saint’ Augustine believed in the divinity of numbers.

Yours,

Luxin
luxin729y@yahoo.ca

The conception of personal God indissolubly connected with two theories :

  1. theory of Vacuum
  2. theory of Light quantum.
    If we shall understand this two theories, we can understand communication
    between the Absolute God and personal God.
    Why? Because:
  3. Vacuum in the beginning has created " light quantum ".

On the question:
What inhale the Life in formulas and equations ?
What must be present in a body to make it alive ?
The answer is:
Soul. Quantum of Light.
Because, from all particles, only and only the quantum of light is a privileged particle.

I named personal God Soul.
I named Soul Quantum of Light.
Why?
Because, from all particles, only and only the quantum of light is a privileged particle.
Only the speed of a light quantum in Vacuum has
a maximal, constant, absolute quantity of c=1.
No other particle can travel with the speed c = 1.
If quantum of light flies always rectilinearly c=1, it is a mad one.
Is he really mad?
No.
In Vacuum, in a condition of rest its internal impulse is equal to zero h=0.
But Quantum of Light has two kinds of internal impulse.
1)Under one internal impulse (Planck,s spin h =1)
a quantum of light flies rectilinearly with speed (c = 1).
A quantum of light behaves as a particle.
2) Under other internal impulse (Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck’s spin ħ = h / 2)
a quantum of light rotates around of his diameter and is known as electron.
A quantum of light behaves as a wave.
Very strange particle is quantum of light.
Quantum of light stays in Vacuum and on it anybody and nothing renders influences.
It is independent and makes a decision in which of the three conditions it occurs.

  1. In a condition of rest its internal impulse is equal to zero h=0.
    2 .In a condition of uniform rectilinear movement its impulse h=1.
  2. In a condition of rotation around of his diameter its impulse ћ =h/2π.
    So it can work only with particle that have his own consciousness.
    They are alive, spiritual particles.
    His own consciousness is not static but can develop.
    The development of consciousness scale goes " from vague wishes up to a clear thought ".
    This evolution proceeds during hundred millions (billion) years.

The Bible was right claiming that in the beginning God had created quantum of light as initial particle. But God has forgotten to explain physical properties of quantum of light; therefore scientists of all times were aimed to solve this secret. However, for many millenniums this secret remained "under seven seals ".
At the end of 10-th, beginning of the 20-th years of the XX century,
Sommerfeld wrote to Einstein: " I can help to develop only engineering of quanta.
You should construct its philosophy ".
However, Einstein did not manage to construct it.
All his life he dreamed to solve the mystery of light. However, at old age,
he had to state:
" All these fifty years of persistent speculations did not approach me to the answer
what light quanta is. Certainly, today everybody thinks that he knows the answer,
but he deceives himself. ".
This expression of the Einstein about a quantum of light is true even today.
Is not it strange?! The quantum of light is an actual particle, initial particle.
It plays a major role in nature. And we do not realize its essence.
How can human society look, if it does not perceive the bases of Genesis?
Can we call this society a full one?
The writer Arthur Kestler said concerning this, that such society goes by
“a track of dinosaurs”. And “the track of dinosaurs” conducts into evolutionary impasse.
It will be lost before time if it does not understand its fundamental principles.

And there’s nothing above/beyond/better then quantum light in our physical universe?

Well, the jews looked long and hard at that magic bullet, and their society still sucked ass.

You’ve got a good attitude about learning and truth, but if you believe that the bible is the word of God, I must disagree.

The good old bibull didn’t exactly explain the science of light speed and relativity, and the crap about the flood, Adam & Eve is false.

I’ve seen so many people defend and add to that old shit case… A book of lie-assed dogma gets so much love and obediance, even though it offers us absolutely nothing at all that we ever get to have in our physical, real, and supposedly sane life.

I AM AN ASSHOLE!
IGNORE ME!!!

I am such a son-of-a-bitch. I’m evil to.
God is a big old shit of a lie.
He scares the hell out of us, gets our hopes up, killes us, and promises us some kinda eternal life that noone ever got.

I’m really evil actually.
Just look at me. I’m teh M@X Ev1L.
Isn’t that evil? You can’t tell me it’s not evil, because it is.
I’m a pile of shit.

Posted: 1985 Post subject: Science & Philosophy. Religion & Physics. XXIc.

The differences and value lay in the application of knowledge, and the direction of theory.

It’s possible to make anything look right. It’s possible to make anything look wrong. But the only thing of value is what works, in a real and not internally-sympathetic sense.

Spanking it doesn’t exaclty advance the species genetically.
Prayer doesn’t exactly teach you objective and applicable facts about “God”.

I’m such a basterd. Ignore me. Really.

I will go look at your site now.
I hope to learn something new.
Thanks for sharing what you value with us.
Your a real nice person,
and the will to share is what helps mutual progress and education exist.
You have yourself a real nice day, and tell your family that I love them.
I want you to have a long, peaceful and truthful life.
Bye.

That the conception “God” was not illusory, it is necessary somehow
to convince in His( Its) connection with reality.
We can not be pleased with the simple description and analyse of the usage
of this conception in religious speech.
The statement, that we can know nothing about the God is wrong.
In this case God is practically denied.
The God, about whom (which) I know nothing,
for me is not already the God and any dialogue with It( Him) is impossible.
/M.J.CHARLESWORTH./


The physicists can not indefinitely break particles.
The science can not eternally develop to “mad infinity.”


Everything, to what physics have approached now is stated,
but without the formulas, in ancient Indian Veda,s books.
Western science, by other way, has reached the same knowledge,
which were known in the East 10000 years ago.
The quantum theory has confirmed religious ideas of the East.
Socratus.

Yeah, but what beliefs about God do you have that are grounded in absolute certainty? For your beliefs about God to qualify as “knowledge” (and thus disprove the assertion that we can’t know anything about God) you have to have a belief which is:
(1) True
(2) Justified

I’m not going to bicker about truth, because that arguments always a circle, but upon what grounds do you derive an absolute justification for a belief in God which makes it knowledge? Furthermore, what do you know for certain about God and how do you justify this “knowlege” in some definitive way?

I’m not saying we can’t know anything about God, more like that many people believe very different things about God, so it’s hard to call anyone’s beliefs knowledge. Also, how can you try to connect all these disparate notions and interpretations of reality? You’re not removing the distortions and obscurities from any of these so-called explanations (the Bible, the Vedas, Quantum Mechanics, Zen)–by connecting them, you’re exposing the frailty of any particular human system to explain the infinite, the eternal, the singularity, light, etc.