Dan’s second look at sex-culture, homosexuality, spirituality, human meaning.
“High rates of psychiatric disorders and suicide attempts among homosexuals.”
“50% higher divorce rates among same-sex marriages.”
Source:
narth.com/docs/sweden.html
catholiceducation.org/articl … o0095.html
Why is that?
Some people would say:
It’s unnatural, unhealthy, twisted, etc. Of course people who are homo-baning will be messed up.
^
That’s one opinion.
What does Dan~ think?
Well, all sex forms are basically stress. Cravings for anything result in an increase of stress-rates. During the teen years kids have got education, [maybe] jobs, sexual cravings have just started up, it’s too much all at once, so suicide rates go up at that time. I think that humans have pretty high stress-rates in industrial cities because of all of the over-stimulation, so they need to relax with bong and beer, or something similar, anything for relief.
Most “mental disorders” or suicides are generally stress-based, so if there tends to be more dysfunction within homo situations, I’ll guess that being homo is harder and more stressful then being hetero. Simple as that. So, if somebody is fruity, they should also remember to be extra-careful with their nerves Go on walks every day. Meditate. Have family time. Etc.
“Homosexuality:
Seeing Past the Propaganda”
jefflindsay.com/gays.html
If they knew how to control or change their desires, would they want to exercise that option?
Article about change recorded as possible.
~
There was a talk-show I remember far back, about a woman who was married for many years, then left her husband and kids, as she says: “I realized I was a lesbian”. Why did it take her that long to figure it out? Wasn’t she “just born that way”? Is personality and preference developed, or genetic?
The audience at the show tended to ask about how often they screwed, and if they liked to screw. Of course it was yes. I don’t think it was about sex.
If they have any attraction at all to the opposite sex, then they DO QUALIFY as BISEXUAL. “Homosexuality” (by the real definition of the word) is very rare. But what if we ignored modern “psychology”? [Modern psychology is just an extension of the morality of the secular world, anyways.] What if sexual actions are caused by something which has no distinct gender? What if we said that, much like a fetish, attraction to a male or female of any form or figure – is actually an attraction to personality, which symbolically hints towards itself within visible shapes and actions? The way a man relates to someone, behaves and exists – is different then the way in which a woman relates to someone, behaves and exists.
When she said: “I later realized I was a lesbian”, I think she misjudged herself, due to her national philosophy. What if she instead said: “I’m a bisexual now, as a byproduct of how much I like love, personality, mannerism and behavior of the female.” Would that make sense? And what if sexual arousal had within it all cravings [which are stress forms] which pertained to the need for companionship, understanding, an assistance towards that person’s main goals? Lust is a misguided byproduct of the lack of love and fulfillment. Porno just reminds people of their loneliness or their need for love in life. The more extreme sexual positions just psychologically strike harder against the already existing [and very misunderstood] spiritual needs. The spiritual needs are so misunderstood that the craving for them is relieved through action. If the body did not have need, the body would not have want.
The act of bringing up some good quality children – requires many years of hard work, patience, wisdom, honor, etc. This is the definitive of human reproductive “success”. Complete ignorance towards the needs for patience, wisdom, honor, harmony, cooperation, devotion, etc., will make for the lacking, which causes the craving, which causes the searching, and the will to take it, which is the aggression
Why is it that some monks, after attaining spiritual fulfillment – naturally become asexual, without suppressing their desires? Their spiritual fulfillment leaves no more spiritual lacking and spiritual craving/desperation, therefor no or less sexual craving. If love isn’t spirituality, what is?
All throughout religious history, [there were times when] celibacy was practiced as an outward display of holiness. They thought that forcing the symptom of an invisible condition – would bring about the holy state. This is an example of the deep spiritual ignorance of humanity. All moral suppression – treats the symptom, not the cause! What do most medicines do today? They suppress the symptom, and they don’t fulfill the needs which were the cause of the problem!
The real issue [which all actions or problems are just a symptom of]
Is the fulfillment and satisfaction of the way which humanity was meant to be.
Call it “god”, or call it “nature”. Call it “true-love”, or call it “enlightenment”. Call it “the ultimate meaning of man”, or call it “the truth”, but there are some big existential needs which humanity needs to find if they want their inner problems to be finally solved.
What they need is invisible. They look everywhere for it, but they cannot see it.
If they found it, where would they put it, other then deep within their mind and heart?
Perhaps they should look inside the vault which was built for the storage of such treasures? [Instead of digging through the dirt of the material world, they should look into the souls of each other.]
The will of one’s creator can be found only deep within the ultimate meaning of the creation.
I’ve been outlining what this ‘spiritual treasure’ is, in my texts, but I’m not done writing that yet.
Thanks for reading so far.
