the brand new god has just come out of the box…
here is the formulation------------------god=nature=reality
New!
Improved!
Better taste!
I know a scientist that follows jesus…he gave me this formulation…
Was his name Spinoza by any chance?
turtle: turtle:the brand new god has just come out of the box…
here is the formulation------------------god=nature=realityI know a scientist that follows jesus…he gave me this formulation…
Was his name Spinoza by any chance?
I think he would be a source for that kind of thinking
Isn’t nature the product of divinity and its opposite? Or otherwise a lack of divinity in some areas.
This is >nature< we are talking about.
isn’t infinity reality? everything else [comparatively] abstract.
interesting…this is the reality god…and you don’t get too much argument from the atheist-theist guys
interesting…this is the reality god…and you don’t get too much argument from the atheist-theist guys
Are you a pantheist or panentheist?
turtle:interesting…this is the reality god…and you don’t get too much argument from the atheist-theist guys
Are you a pantheist or panentheist?
I am neither…I am unaffiliated with any group or word…I like to discuss ideas…and as soon as you use a word the atheist–theist guys attack
God=Nature=Reality is pantheism.
God=Nature=Reality is pantheism.
I am not a pantheist…that is my point
Ierrellus:God=Nature=Reality is pantheism.
I am not a pantheist…that is my point
Then you do not believe God=Nature=Reality.
turtle: Ierrellus:God=Nature=Reality is pantheism.
I am not a pantheist…that is my point
Then you do not believe God=Nature=Reality.
ier that is too simplistic …how can you possibly know what I believe…you are making a assumption that is not based on knowing
No. I’m basing assumptions on the description of god you have given us. If your description has no need of clarification or of scrutiny, why waste your and our time posting it?
No. I’m basing assumptions on the description of god you have given us. If your description has no need of clarification or of scrutiny, why waste your and our time posting it?
I don’t know if I believe this shit g=n=r formulation…
it needs clarification…would you like to discuss possible clarifications on what you BELIEVE…
Ierrellus:No. I’m basing assumptions on the description of god you have given us. If your description has no need of clarification or of scrutiny, why waste your and our time posting it?
I don’t know if I believe this shit g=n=r formulation…
it needs clarification…would you like to discuss possible clarifications on what you BELIEVE…
It’s up to you to clarify. And I wish you would give me the same consideration in my “Faith” thread, rather than quibbling over words with Phyllo.
turtle: Ierrellus:No. I’m basing assumptions on the description of god you have given us. If your description has no need of clarification or of scrutiny, why waste your and our time posting it?
I don’t know if I believe this shit g=n=r formulation…
it needs clarification…would you like to discuss possible clarifications on what you BELIEVE…It’s up to you to clarify. And I wish you would give me the same consideration in my “Faith” thread, rather than quibbling over words with Phyllo.
phyllo and I are clarifying…on the faith thred…
who made the RULE that the op had to do the clarifying…
how about discussing the possible meanings
Will you discuss pantheism? Spinoza? The basic ramifications of the OP formula? What do you want from us?
Will you discuss pantheism? Spinoza? The basic ramifications of the OP formula? What do you want from us?
ier—do you like this formula…please tell me
Ierrellus:Will you discuss pantheism? Spinoza? The basic ramifications of the OP formula? What do you want from us?
ier—do you like this formula…please tell me
Yes, I do.