Obama: Why I won't say 'Islamic terrorism'

Here is Obama view;

Do you agree with Obama’s views?

Yes.

I don’t agree with Obama’s views and I believe he is just as ignorant of the real Islam as the Dalai Lama in this thread viewtopic.php?f=5&t=191291

Islam as it is practiced at present comprised the following;
What is Islam-Proper?

  1. Islam proper -Quran-Only
  2. Pseudo-Islam -Ahadith based Sunni, Shia, Sufi, etc.
  3. Fringe Islam - include messenger other than Muhammad, etc.

An understanding of the full range of Islam will expose Obama politically-correct and ignorant understanding of Islam as what it is.

Here is a comment from someone and I agree fully with what is written;

We as individual[s] should never accept blindly the views from others [especially critics and zealous Muslims].
What is critical is one must read the Quran and other Islamic texts to reconfirm verses that are quoted and expressed by critics of Islam.

On using Christians and other religions as a counter:

From the expressed views of Obama in relation to Islam and Radical Islam, it is obvious Obama is ignorant of what Islam really represent.

It is very intellectually dishonest of a President [or any one] to express views when s/he is ignorant of the subject matter.

Christianity isn’t the same as Muslimism.

Christ=leader of Christianity.

Mohammed=leader of Muslimism.

Christ=pacifist who says turn thy cheeks.
Mohammed=promises 17 virgins for blowing up the non-believers.

The Crusaders and Catholics were Christian Terrorists but their actions didn’t make any sense because they contradicted Christ. Muslim terrorists however do not contradict Mohammed.