sdwilson2002
Guys and girls.
It’s just that the current circumstances are closer to female nature and female nature is mostly contented in adapting to whatever circumstances it finds itself in. It is less antagonistic.
Being social, in general, requires a feminine dispositions.
The larger the social group, the more feminine the disposition.
Female psychology, which males also possess by the way, is more interested in harmony and cooperation and fitting in, which coincides with group cohesion and social interests.
This, and their sexual power, is what makes them ‘genetic filtering systems’, as I’ve explained in the original text.
Like everyone else I am confronted with the daily choice of “giving in†or facing the social consequences.
This every day choice is directly related to my contentment and my sense of well being. In other words, I have very little of it.
My mind tells me what is the reasonable choice but my soul screams out for a relief from that choice, for an alternative, for confrontation and resistance.
When someone threatens me, for example, or pisses me off, I desperately want to unleash my fury upon him, knowing what pleasure this will give me, my every molecule screams out for it. Yet, my mind considers the implications, the social consequences and I begrudgingly repress my instincts.
This is the root for many anxieties and mental disorders. This repression can build up over time and express itself in other ways.
The choice is between allowing one drive to be expressed and risking all future expressions of many other drives or between a genuine self and well-being. .
The system is set up in such a way so as to result in a reasonable decision, which forces adaptation or quarantine or extinction.
We are dependant on society and so we are bound to social rules.
We live in a distinctly “reasoned†culture. A culture defined by its optimism concerning rationality, an “Alexandrian/Socratic†world Nietzsche called it.
Weber called capitalism and the industrial revolution, the “rationalization†of society.
Within it efficiency and productivity become paramount and all spirituality, and artistry are diminished. The mystical is defamed and instinct slandered.
Bureaucratic facelessness is the end result. A system governed by the indifference of numerical values, where everything, even individuality, is given a number.
Reason is cold and soulless and, as we are now discovering, unable to fully offer explanations for the universe and existence. It, and its product science, now reverts to artistry to describe quantum phenomena. Superstring theory is a highly artistic interpretation of things beyond our capacity to fully comprehend.
Famous people are caricatures and creations of image making machines and not real people.
Since, I don’t know either Nicholson or Jagger personally and only know of them and their pop personas, I cannot comment on their real nature.
All the ones that have not had the self-control or the mind to make that reasoned choice, I mentioned before, are either incarcerated or dead.
Kaczynski comes to mind, but he had the audacity to believe he could change things and the idealism to care.
The maleness I describe thrives in frontiers.
There are none left, which are accessible yet. So, this maleness, hibernates in us all.
Man’s nature is the product of a more challenging, austere and dangerous environment. Man has also evolved to participate in and feel more psychologically attached to smaller social groups, than the present ones.
Evolution works at a snails pace, so we can say that human nature is being slowly affected by current environments and that ‘feminization’ is this adaptation of the individual to more affluent, safer, easier circumstances. The term ‘feminization’ can be replaced with the term ‘domestication’, if you wish.
The discontentment many feel, the sense of not belonging and of alienation is often the consequence of this slow alteration, as the repression of the parts in us which are considered unwanted from a cultural perspective, burdens us with the constant necessity of keeping ourselves under the control of reason and only express instinct in small bursts [pressure releases] or within particular areas and under special circumstances.
In this slow change of psychology, environmental circumstances as they are culturally [in other words rationally] defined, impose themselves upon us.
For those with more docile, passive personalities, the adaptation to the change is less painful.
Pre-Socratic Hellas because they found that balance between reason and instinct [Dionysian/Apollinian] and they enjoyed the sense of tragedy/comedy this invokes or amongst the natives of North America before the white man came because they exemplify a man living within nature, with both awe and respect, or amongst the Norse because of their mythical prowess.