

Wonderer wrote:the first painting strikes me as religous
Eclipse wrote:Wonderer wrote:the first painting strikes me as religous
Spiritual in a way, not so much "religious" though.
Wonderer wrote:the buddha underneath the tree is somewhat obvious... but i felt a christian presence in the piece as well

ceadem wrote:Wonderer wrote:the buddha underneath the tree is somewhat obvious... but i felt a christian presence in the piece as well
i find the idea of a christian presence interesting, maybe the artist himself wouldn't say the piece is meant as christian but the symbolism of religious ideas in various religions is similar to each other, as both buddha and christ are considered sun gods...maybe there is a single unifying link...or root in how we depict these ideas, or maybe they're just cliche, but i'm not assuming the role of critic






Iosepusmagus wrote:Buddha is not considered as a sun god. Christians use the sun as a symbolism rather than the actual realm or essence of Christ.
Maynard James Keenan wrote:I agree. I think his work is very interesting but it seems lifeless to me in a way. Too claculating or something. To each his own though.
Wonderer wrote:You guys should check out chet zar

RebelEpsilon wrote:I have a reluctance to even consider CG (computer generated) work as Art. CG work is too perfect, clean, it's superficial. I dislike the Alex Grey work simply because the imagery is cliche.
Phoebus wrote:RebelEpsilon wrote:I have a reluctance to even consider CG (computer generated) work as Art. CG work is too perfect, clean, it's superficial. I dislike the Alex Grey work simply because the imagery is cliche.
This doesn't strike me as sufficient grounds for dismissing CG's possibilities as art.
RebelEpsilon wrote:
You mean my prejudices aren't sufficient grounds for my opinions?
I dislike the Alex Grey work simply because the imagery is cliche.
Return to Art, Music, and Entertainment
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]