Of course, I am just kidding… a little bit. The Truth is: Everybody has blood of the ‘innocents’ on their hands. I have it on mine; you have it on yours. This necessarily-is-true by-default because to eat & consume another Animal is ‘Cold-Blooded-Murder’ and there is no exception to this rule. You are a Murderer. I am a Murderer. There is no difference. Plants are living too. If you consume bread (wheat) then you are yet-again a Murderer of Life. There is no-way to get around this except to commit Suicide and allow the plants, worms, and Earth consume your body. If you do not do this then you are 100% selfish. You are 100% egotistical. Does this make sense to you? ~because it makes perfect-sense to me. Therefore: Nothing in Life is Free!!! Do you understand or are you a child still? ‘God’ is not ‘Free’. ‘Love’ is not ‘Free’. ‘Life’ is not ‘Free’. Women and Females, however, will keep their (childish)-delusions on this matter as women and females are never compelled to follow rules of Logical-Thinking outside the ever-present protection of Guardians (who are men). Women can never be ‘Guardians’ to or ‘Keepers’ of Human Knowledge. “But why!?” you may ask me. The answer is: women are emotional and incapable of logically-thinking. Women cannot think by-definition.
I know this fact upsets & provokes a great-number & quantity of people. And if the choice were up to me to change my Opinion on this stance then I would do so. But as it turns out my Opinion is no Opinion at all… rather it is an assertion that continues to re-posit itself over & over & over again. Where are the so-called “Women Philosophers” of the world??? (And I do not count Sophists of Academia here.) Where are all the “female-thinkers”??? Could it be that a Physio-Biological-Divide exists that separates men & women apart for an Eternity? The indefinite answer is “Yes!!!” from me based-upon my own 1) life-experiences, 2) empirical data, and 3) philosophical inquiry (which is the most important aspect of all forms of knowing). Therefore any Knowledge that a woman may or may not have is through both the discretion and permission of men as the Highest Authority of thinking & knowing. Keep-in-mind that I actively-encourage (civil & uncivil discussion) regarding this assertion because I would enjoy to be proven wrong although I doubt I will ever meet somebody who can prove to me that women can think as-opposed-to “merely-cognizing” Reality as a Passive-Process. It shan't be done within *MY* presence. Therefore all Feminists will come to hate me by-default as I am he-who-blocks-them from accessing Free-Thinking, or, Human Knowledge. The Gate is sealed. And I will open the Gate for no-one, ever, to access Higher Knowledge as I am a Guardian.
Before I move on I must acknowledge that there exists a difference between Subhuman Knowledge and Transhuman Knowledge. Not only-do I believe that the Human Species is fragmenting into two… I know the fact is true with Absolute-Certainty of which no-one on this planet can prove to me otherwise. That is how Certain I am of this fact… absolutely-speaking. Why is the Human Specie fragmenting? Ask the Author of the Feminization of Man thesis. He will tell you the reasons whereas I will not. I will not divulge such information because the answers to these Sociological questions are prized, and, actually-worth money to know & understand. As I have learned from my Source… so must you or any-other learn from the Source, like drawing water from the well of publick-knowledge. There is a price-paid to Philosophy, in-Blood. Sophists and women know-naught of such payments and blood-sacrifices as women & children are kept back from the cold, harsh reality of Life to cull & compel them towards the Will of Mankind because Mankind is he-whom-directs the Specie, its Past, and its Future. The Present, the Here-and-Now, are left-overs of Knowledge… and this is the realm for women & children to play-around as if it were true that all of them should become "men" or "adults" at all. Sadly-speaking, this is not the case. Such directions and paths of Higher Knowledge *ARE* written in-Blood: DNA-sequences, straight from the Source. Thus is where Human Knowledge begins & ends. Therefore all the ‘secrets’ locked-away by Mankind will remain where it always-has: "in-the-blood".
Epistemology and Logical-Postivism
Like all other philosophical-categorizations in the 21st Century, Epistemology as a study of sophistry is outdated and must completely-be-deconstructed, and destroyed. Logical Positivists are the first ones who need to die because Sophistry must die. Academics must be “put-to-death” to the True and Actual Philosophers of the world. In other words, allow me to say: “To exchange money-for-knowledge is an Abomination to God.” Now, of course I do not actually-believe in “God” per se but the linguistic modifier is necessary here because the Common Masses literally-are stupid people (compared to intelligent-discriminating minds, for example). Common people must be “talked-down-to” as if they were infants because they will go no further than what emotionally-comforts them concerning any Deep or Great Truths of the world. Therefore Sophistry must be contextualized along-with and just-below that subject of Divine Authority. In other words, Actual Philosophers, in their flesh & blood, must teach "for free" which is not to say that the teaching actually-is-free… but rather that the cost incurred by any such teachings shall *NOT* become precluded by monetary-proprietorship!!! ~because (human?) knowledge is Invaluable. It would be akin to putting a price-tag on Health (as a Virtue), or your first-born son, or your daughters. In the latter case such parents would no longer be considered ‘Parents’ to their children but rather: ‘Pimps’ and ‘Prostitutes’ as a Family. Such reasoning reeks of Moral-Decay, Selective-Reasoning, Perversion, Pædophilia, and Incest. Such reasoning reminds me of… Amerika! ~Land of the Pervert, Home of the Depraved.
These reflections should signal to an Individual the how & why moral depravity is so important-a-topic within Socialities. A Society cannot function where Values and Virtue runs dry (as they have in the former American Republic at the final apex of the second millennium of Mankind). A Society devoid of Honor and Masculine-virtue is no Society at all… it is just a realm of depravity, a Hell, where Hedonistic-Bliss runs wild and unfettered, uncontrolled. Decay and Entropy ensue. The collapse of such a Society then becomes inevitable. What does all of this have to do with Knowledge???
Money!!!
When a Sociality puts a price-tag on Knowledge; this is the coup de grâce of a Culture. Thus ensues Non-Culture or a "tearing-away" of societal values & fabrics. Not ironically-speaking, one of the "First Sins" of all Moral Codes (if not the First) was uttering the Lords name in-vain. What does this Religious Code connote??? ~it connotes that Sophistry is an Abomination!!! Therefore you people should be thankful that a person like myself is never put in-charge of a Society. Because the first thing I would do is issue a Death Warrant for all Academics who are paid for their teaching. This Death Warrant would be Absolute. In other words, any person caught exchanging knowledge-for-money would be killed on-site and without trial. And the next people who would receive the same punishment would be those who utter the word “God” in-public or on the Internet. In other words, if you speak or type-out the word “God” then you immediately-would-be put-to-death without trial. There would be *NO* exceptions to these first two rules because tolerance for breaking the Rule of Law is a social-weakness. Societies are run through Order and never Chaos. As I am an Anarchist I am in no control or position of Authority regarding Socialities. I only-can-speak for Myself.
Presumption: Knowledge is Responsibility.
Knowledge is Power.
Great Knowledge is Great Power.
With Power comes Responsibility.
Therefore: Great Knowledge is Great Power and with Great Power comes Great Responsibility.
Non-Individuals need not apply to Human Knowledge or general-knowing because Non-adults are both incapable and genetically-unfit to bear such burdens (of responsibility). This includes women & children which is not to say that either are *NOT* intelligent because many women & children are intelligent people. However this fact does not mean nor imply that women & children are thinkers, or, morally-culpable individuals. In-fact, just the opposite, women & children should be *PRESUMED* (by men) to be unfit for Great Responsibility since women *NEVER* show signs of Great Knowledge. To prove this point… all I need to do is ask a very pertinent and clear-question to All: “What is a so-called Woman-Philosopher?”
And to prove the underlying-assertion:
“Point one out to me. Show me the female who is a (breathing) Philosopher. Lead me to her, or, bring her to me. I will decide for Absolute-Certainty.”
The Future of… Knowledge?
Since the Human Specie will split in a matter of a couple centuries between a Slave-class of people (the aesthetically-displeasing: black, stupid, short, fat, ugly people) and a Working-class of people (the aesthetically-pleasing: white, smart, tall, athletic, beautiful people), my essay on "Human Knowledge" is ambiguous and must be contextualized within a greater-aspect of (human) knowing. Obviously-speaking, you might presume that I-myself necessarily-am "white, smart, tall, athletic, and beautiful" but this is not the (whole) case & circumstance. I am just-as-imperfect as the next Man. However I do acknowledge my literal "shortcomings". I could be a black, stupid, short, fat, ugly person claiming my exact-same-claims and nobody would be wiser for the ware. All I have to do to disprove such reasoning and fling it all away is to acknowledge that Great Philosophers are not 'stupid'. Albert Einstein, for example, was a very smart Jew, perhaps one of the smartest people of All-Time. Therefore was it "just a coincidence" that he was also White and Jewish??? If Albert Einstein was a black man then how much would Human History be changed? It would be changed forever; I say. I say further: Imagine what-if Martin Luther King was a white man… what then???
As my reasoning compels others to comply with my thinking… my point evermore clearly-stands-out to All. Circumstantial contexts enlighten all facts. White people are smart. Black people are… what? You fill in the gaps. Let me just say right now: “I would be the first Man to enjoy saying that All are Equal or Black people are just as intelligent as White people… but until the facts are *PROVEN* and empirically-verified, then I have no Reason nor Compulsion to adhere to the Leftist-Liberal-Feminist notions that All are somehow… magically… created Equal. I ask… *HOW* can this be true when spatial-locality and laws of physical symmetry disallow all conditions of non-locality??? Or in other words: The Law of Identity, the Law of Non-Contradiction, the Law of Excluded-Middle, and the Law of Energy-Conservation are *ALL* true!!!” Thus if somebody cannot disprove the laws as they stand… then I have no need nor compulsion to adhere my personal views, and my Individuality, to a flawed paradigm to begin with. But not ironically-speaking it is the Sophist, the Logical Positivist, and the Religiously-Inclined who are the first (feminized) men who step-up to disprove such assertions as-if *THEIR* dependency did not rest on the fact that they cannot step out of Empiricism into the realm of Philosophy!!!
I apologize for my Passion here because my Passion for Philosophy often gets the best of me and I get ahead of myself in-thinking and in-speaking of Philosophy. Many Ironies appear in people who cannot fix their own Contradictions. Therefore when we return-backward to the Subject of Human Knowledge… the questions that can be asked become misleading depending on the very Quality of the mind that poses them. In other words, stupid people do not get very far in Philosophy. And when they give-up, and become Sophists, this usually-is the first sign of a decrepit or aging mind. Why should the pauper be paid $10.00 for his labours, the Sophist $100.00 for his, and then *BOTH* of these fellows buy beer-over-bread and constitute this thinking as being "Healthy" in some fathomable way!? I just do not understand the mindset of such Depravity and Backward-Selectiveness in this thinking, very Anti-Philosophical.
Ignorance v Knowing
Here is the prize for my daily boredom…
Knowing is a male-activity. I would enjoy if females could participate in this activity but it does not seem that they can as they are *REACTIONARY* thinkers. In other words, males act while females react. Either can enact or become inactive. This latter point is null. Men are the Trailblazers for Mankind, and Humanity. It was *NEVER* women who were flying into the Great Unknowns and it never shall be (in a sense of historical accuracy). In other words, it is the male-paradigm and genetic-phenotype that sets the Precedence for trudging into Great Unknowns as "unnecessary". But it is Necessary! Because if Human Knowing stagnates then it will become cancerous and die-off. Anything not utilized by the Human Body atrophies, stagnates, and dies. This is why the Human Animal does not have a tail (any longer) and does not sprout wings (any longer). We probably-did a long-long time ago but we do not anymore because these physical adaptions did not help our ancient, ancient, ancient, ancient, ancient ancestors to live (when we were all insects). Therefore the Human Animal has selected a route or path that enlightens all things & adaptions as relevant to our immediate survival. This is the Crux of Human Intelligence, and of Knowing-in-General.
Knowledge is… Immediate Survival and all genetic Adaptions which trend-toward-Life, opposed-to-Death. In other words, Stupid is that which will get you killed, maimed, or castrated. Intelligence is everything-otherwise. If you drink tons of beer or smoke tons of pot then you are Stupid because this excess probably-will kill you given enough time. Therefore *YOU* are a stupid person if you blatantly-risk your Health toward whatever other end. I have never heard the case made where, on your death bed, that if you are given another drought of beer or another drag of smoke that you will (somehow) live for 10 more years, magically, as-if these actions "all of a sudden" increased your vitality. This is Ludicrous-thinking, and, Stupid. Therefore the Actions of people will indicate their genetic predispositions. Why do people drink beer? Often they drink beer to alleviate social pressures and 'walls' of social interactions. In other words, white people need to become drunk in-order-to socially-engage each other. ~why? ~because white people have become disconnected from their distant Pasts and Roots. The more Ancient, black tribe, on the other hand, still retains its connection and cohesiveness as a Community. White people genetically-are-distanced from such roots: hence Amerikanism and Social Nihilism. But the Factors for Survival have never changed! What keeps *YOU* alive is what is considered Plato's Good and my Healthy. Goodness is Health, Sobriety, Justice, Virtue, Vitality, etc. Therefore to say that “God is Good” is to state the obvious, for man-children, who can never leave the presence of their sky-daddy.
Ignorance is… a human reaction to Fear, Loathing, and Great Unknowns. Death is Ignorance and what people ought to become ignorant from as-if they already-were-not. But they are! Death is never experienced. And the closer a Man comes to Death the more he will see his own Life, and alternatively-value-it after-the-fact. Such reasoning leads to Life-Principles, or, Knowing-in-General… that Death always-is one-step-away from where you are, right around the corner. Women and Children are taught to fear-naught such things because men are the Guardians and Keepers of such (negative) Knowledge. Therefore when a woman claims you are a "negative person" what she means to say is that "You are a Man". You are a Knower-of-Death. Shall women & children be placed in this realm, of Mankind, and of Philosophy? I say that they should not be because to prematurely-become a Man, an Adult, and an Individual all imply that women & children properly-are-prepared for such tasks. Are they though!?!? What are the challenges of the 21st Century except how to resist and swipe-away Gays and Lesbians from getting you drunk and raping you?
Everything is free when… Everything is stupid, decrepit, ugly, and worthless. This is the true notion of "Freedom", a mix between ugliness and valor(?)…
Such a notion does not exist outside of a dream of the Meek.
Knowledge incurs the Highest Cost of all material things. The order of knowing goes:
1) Knowledge (theos)
2) Truth (logos)
3) Goodness (teleos)
4) Value/Virtue (ethos)
In *MY* society I would first make Education of Principles the highest-possible-honor in Society. Teachers and Professors must teach for free, by Law. In-fact, if you own more than $100,000.00 worth of material goods… I would revoke your ability to teach in *MY* society. If you were caught teaching anything to anybody without the qualifications of a Teacher, the Highest Citizen of a Free Republik, then I would befit the Law in my society to kill you on-spot without trial. This is the Extremity of Sacrifice. To Teach is To Know. And if Knowledge is not Authentic, faked, and devoid of Honor and Humility then this is no Knowledge at all. It is Sophistry. It is a closed-coffin of "Academia", dusty, dead books of whose keepers masturbate all over the honored principles of Man that has already-walked up the Pyramid of Knowing.
All Private Teachers in *MY* society would be executed. All Teaching must be Public otherwise it would, by-definition, not be a part of Society. It would be Individuated and free-from-first-principles, devoid of moral responsibility. In other words it would be Sophistry or various forms of Solipsism, saying whatever you want without Reason, without Discourse, without Verification, without Proof, without Empiricism, without Logic, etc. It would be: Saying the World is Flat because my sky-daddy told me so! How disgusting is this thinking, this Christian way-of-thinking (as man-children)? If a Man cannot Reason then he is no Man (to me) at all. That is what I say. He does not even have the substance to state he "knows nothing" but rather that All he knows is Ignorance of all possible things.
Why is Teaching and Professing so-damn-important? Because the Division between Truth and Falsity is Absolute-Qualification. It is yes-or-no, the flip of a switch. You either are correct or you are incorrect. Some people give-up on 'correct' as they give-up on Reasoning. Very few, or none-others, have the capacity or capability of Thought and Thinking to reason-reason-reason-reason-reason the way through a difficult problem. If a Student becomes more intelligent than a teacher in my society then that Student will become the Teacher, no matter what the age of the pupil. In other words, if a High School biology teacher teaches the class that the Universe is "Created by our Lord, thy God, Hollowed-by-thy-Name" then a pupil who can actively-disprove such meaningless-assertions must *TAKE-OVER* the role of teaching the class even if he is age 6, 12, 18, it does not matter the age! Reason knows no-boundaries! Reason breaks-down all possibilities!
If a student can trump the teaching of a failed teacher, in my society, then the case will be made as to how the Teacher will be punished for his/her stupidity. For example, the Christian teacher I used in my example above must publicly-be-shamed somehow by the student who challenges & exposes his/her Christian Dogma and General-Ignorance. I would hold a public debate between the student and the teacher. And if the student reasons out a proof that "Creationist-Christian-Science" is a bunch of stupid bullshit (which it is), fabricated fairy-tales of a non-existent sky-daddy, then that student will revoke the teachers rites to teach, and replace his/her position as a teacher. My society would be ruled by *SKILL*, *KNOWLEDGE*, and *REASON*! There would be no exceptions. If you are a dumbass then you will not be culled. You will be kicked to the street, and possibly-executed if you are not reinstitutionalized into a proper category. For example, Christian teachers do not belong in the public school system. I might set them out into the fields for hard-labour, for example, because their thinking is outdated and generally-ignorant of Greater Truths. Knowing is not Faithing. Knowing is not Delusive-Hope. It is Real. It is Hard. It is Fact. It can be demonstrated over & over & over & over again.
I pick up a pen on my desk. I let go of it. It falls down and lands on my desk. I do this over & over & over & over & over again. This sets a precedence for the Theory of Gravity which empirically-can-be verified wherever you go & travel throughout the Entire Universe. On the other hand, a man, woman, or child can never point to something and say “Look, there is God!” without reasoned-verification. Where is God??? Show Him to me! Point me to Him. If He is a person then I want to meet Him and shake his hand. I want to wine & dine with Him and ask Him questions where he would show me and expose to me, with Absolute-Perfect-Ability what is-or-is-not True.
To end, because I am getting weary of typing to empty rooms of people who choose to read my essays and works and not respond to them… I will go ahead and just say that Human Knowledge strictly-is a “Human” endeavor and “Human” experience. If you are not Human then what you are??? I know that I am a Man, at least. And Man is (a species of) Animal which is to say that Mankind is changing, becoming, and evolving into… something else, always! Mankind continually-is-evolving into something new, something undefined. This ‘Futurism’ represents Tomorrow. The ‘Past’ represents Yesterday. The ‘Present’ represents the here & now, the Most-Apparent-Reality. This is not to say that the Past or Future do not exist… because they do as extensions of knowing. My memory exists as the confirmation to my own past. My projection exists as the confirmation to my own future. I project into the Unknown and I see Tomorrow, where I will go, what I will do, who I will meet with, what I will say.
I determine my Fate.
Because I have the capacity to. I have the Moral-Responsibility and Individuality to say what I choose, and why.
Because I have the Knowledge to.
