But you would have to tel us how these “light wheels” would work. Is something rotating in order to send out light in different directions? Photons don’t simply turn for no reason.
What Lorentz might have dealt with is irrelevant because he did not actually have all of the transformations that today bear his name and he did not develop the theory of relativity. However, the Lorentz transformations deals with timing. You are claiming that we will see some difference in timing.
But let’s accept that what you say about the Lorentz transformations. If it is true that the Lorentz transformations do not effect your peculiar wheel, then what is your motivation for claiming that in SR one frame will have less spins than in another frame? If the Lorentz transformations don’t apply, then what is your basis for your guess about the difference? Are you simply making guesses without any foundation?
As always, because you have never actually had to work all the way through a problem in SR, you don’t see the fundamental problems in your scenarios. You quit every one of your SR threads when somebody finally shows one of your fundamental mistakes. Learning to actually complete a basic problem from an SR textbook would aid you immensely.
If the reflector actually made only 9 spins in the train frame, then it would only make 9 spins in any other frame. Any other frame would see that the reflector spun more slowly that the train frame measured. This is basic SR.
This is again simply vanilla SR, no paradox at all. Clocks operate differently at different speeds.
Why should we use an absolute reference frame? Again, if you are trying to prove relativity to be wrong or paradoxical, you have to prove this using the actual theory. SR rejects that there are absolute reference frames.
According to the train, the station’s time is running slower. Thus according to your logic, the light from the train should be red shifted.
Regardless, let’s see you work out the actual calculations of how much blue or red shifting there is in any frame. If you want to actually say something about SR, then let’s see you demonstrate how SR actually treats this situation.
You actually have to use the Lorentz transformations to prove anything relevant. Yet when challenged to do so, you clammed up and claimed that they do not apply. This is similar to the deceptive behaviour you used in another thread here, where your point was trashed very badly by multiple posters and you then claimed that you meant something different from your original post (though evidence at other message boards proves otherwise). So either provide an example that uses the Lorentz transformations to derive some difference between frames (the only way that SR ever derives a difference between frames) or move along.