Anyone fancy a debate..?

If Tab accepts, I would suggest a longer post with more detail.

Pav,

If Tab accepts, I would suggest a longer post with more detail.

Thanks for the tip. I have a tendency of being brief.

No, more a case of the freedom to be anything at all, at least anything unique or even novel.

I’ve a nasty feeling that N.'s Überguy is all things to all men. So, I don’t know to be frank. I don’t know enough Nietzche anyway, to make it interesting for you.

It goes far, far deeper than you have imagined it to be.

I don’t mind if you want to team up with Fuse and debate with me. And as Pav says, have a think about what you want to say first in a bit more detail if you like.

Sure I will team up with Fuse, when do we start?

Shall we commence with the debate then give the whole community voting rights for which argument was superior?

Yeah sure, it worked okay last time, after half a million bumps. Start tomorrow if you like - Do you want to go first or second, or shall we let Pav flip a coin…?

You go first, because I don’t exactly know the point you are trying to get across with authenticity.

Then Fuse or I can go, depending on what Fuse wants. If fuse wants to respond first then he can respond first and last, while I respond in the middle, 3-posts each side of the debate. So if Fuse wants to post twice or once, that is up to him.

Hokay-Kokey, I will post something up by tomorrow night. :smiley: Yay, debate on.

Personally, I think that both Fuse and Debaitor should get one post following each of Tab’s posts, if Tab accepts the handicap. Provided Fuse and Debaitor communicate a little with one another prior to posting, redundancy can be kept to a minimum.

Sure Debaitor, let’s do it! :slight_smile:

Tab,

I’m game as well. I’ll post second, after you. But can we see if someone wants to team up with you? A two-on-two debate sounds good. Maybe advertise for a partner in a new thread?

It wouldn’t matter to me, but would be an obvious disadvantage to Tab.

So how about a partner, Tab?

I can also argue it without Nietzsche. I can also argue against originality. Since there seems to be a team pitted against you I might try debating the opposite feelings on the matter and see if I can make people think twice?

Call me asocial, but this duck hunts alone.

I’m okay with fuse and Debaiter both posting after me. All grist to the mill.

This reminds me of -quite a deal- of pretty girls I have known.
:romance-heart:

:smiley: Sorry, I didn’t mean to hurt you. But then I’ll bet those girls said that too right…

Anyway, At the age of 40+, I’m deep into FILF territory, probably somewhere you don’t ever want to go, or even wake up in by accident.

Well…the nicer ones did…
:crying-yellow:

FILF?

Okay, Tab.

:laughing: Well, you’ve heard of the acronym ‘MILF’ yeah…? And I’m a father…

Okay - started a thread for the debate: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=173320

Cool, when the Debate is complete I’ll do the same thing I did with ours and Sticky some threads asking people to vote.

Because we know how astoundingly well that worked last time. (What, eight votes?)