No, more a case of the freedom to be anything at all, at least anything unique or even novel.
I’ve a nasty feeling that N.'s Überguy is all things to all men. So, I don’t know to be frank. I don’t know enough Nietzche anyway, to make it interesting for you.
It goes far, far deeper than you have imagined it to be.
I don’t mind if you want to team up with Fuse and debate with me. And as Pav says, have a think about what you want to say first in a bit more detail if you like.
Yeah sure, it worked okay last time, after half a million bumps. Start tomorrow if you like - Do you want to go first or second, or shall we let Pav flip a coin…?
You go first, because I don’t exactly know the point you are trying to get across with authenticity.
Then Fuse or I can go, depending on what Fuse wants. If fuse wants to respond first then he can respond first and last, while I respond in the middle, 3-posts each side of the debate. So if Fuse wants to post twice or once, that is up to him.
Personally, I think that both Fuse and Debaitor should get one post following each of Tab’s posts, if Tab accepts the handicap. Provided Fuse and Debaitor communicate a little with one another prior to posting, redundancy can be kept to a minimum.
I’m game as well. I’ll post second, after you. But can we see if someone wants to team up with you? A two-on-two debate sounds good. Maybe advertise for a partner in a new thread?
I can also argue it without Nietzsche. I can also argue against originality. Since there seems to be a team pitted against you I might try debating the opposite feelings on the matter and see if I can make people think twice?