Moderator: MagsJ
turtle wrote:It is obvious now from the replies, that philosophers do need psychoanalysts. Nothing of substance on this thread means the philosophers are hiding. Exposure of ignorance is not very pleasant. Let's deal with a specific item. We would all agree that there is a reproductive instinct in humans. But there would be a disagreement about a death instinct. Please come forward and tell the group if you have a death instinct. I don't believe I have a death instinct but I am not a philosopher. I bring up death because of the massive denial and distortion that persons have about the existential biggie.

Only_Humean wrote:turtle wrote:It is obvious now from the replies, that philosophers do need psychoanalysts. Nothing of substance on this thread means the philosophers are hiding. Exposure of ignorance is not very pleasant. Let's deal with a specific item. We would all agree that there is a reproductive instinct in humans. But there would be a disagreement about a death instinct. Please come forward and tell the group if you have a death instinct. I don't believe I have a death instinct but I am not a philosopher. I bring up death because of the massive denial and distortion that persons have about the existential biggie.
This is a philosophy discussion board, not a group therapy session. Either discuss philosophy, please, or request a move to a more relevant board.
turtle wrote:ONLY-------------I think you have just made a philosophical error. Philosophy is intimately tied to psychology. You cannot separate the two. I wanted to make a philosophical point by bringing up the death instinct which has been discussed here before. Are you talking to turtle or everyone on this thread? Maybe you cannot stand the idea that what philosophers are writing, is profoundly influenced by their psychology. Also can you be more specific about what is bothering you.

Only_Humean wrote:turtle wrote:ONLY-------------I think you have just made a philosophical error. Philosophy is intimately tied to psychology. You cannot separate the two. I wanted to make a philosophical point by bringing up the death instinct which has been discussed here before. Are you talking to turtle or everyone on this thread? Maybe you cannot stand the idea that what philosophers are writing, is profoundly influenced by their psychology. Also can you be more specific about what is bothering you.
Sorry, I edited while you were writing this. It's probably a sign I wasn't breast-fed enough as a child.
I agree that philosophy is tied to psychology. It's also tied to sociology, religion and science, and we have separate boards for all of those things. Plus the Rant House if you want to get in touch with the anger you feel for an absent father, Creative Writing if you feel the need to express your anima's urges and Mundane Babble for your weekly spell on the couch
objet petit a wrote:Perhaps we should forget about it and just get back to the investigation of the psyche as a part of every theory. It would ..uuhm... signify the death-drive, wouldn't you say, turtle?
Only_Humean wrote:turtle wrote:It is obvious now from the replies, that philosophers do need psychoanalysts. Nothing of substance on this thread means the philosophers are hiding. Exposure of ignorance is not very pleasant. Let's deal with a specific item. We would all agree that there is a reproductive instinct in humans. But there would be a disagreement about a death instinct. Please come forward and tell the group if you have a death instinct. I don't believe I have a death instinct but I am not a philosopher. I bring up death because of the massive denial and distortion that persons have about the existential biggie.
This is a philosophy discussion board, not a group therapy session. Either discuss philosophy, please, or request a move to a more relevant board.
Edit: this is not directed at turtle specifically, and not meant as a warning.
uglypeoplefucking wrote:i apologize for posting a patently un-philosophical response
PavlovianModel146 wrote:I'm also reading a little about OCD right now, and while my actions may be considered compulsive, I don't fit the bill for obsessive about anything at all. None of my actions seem to alleviate any kind of overt worry about anything, but instead simply bring me peace for some reason.
turtle wrote:If it wasn't a warning then what was it? Why do you feel the need to intervene?

Only_Humean wrote:turtle wrote:If it wasn't a warning then what was it? Why do you feel the need to intervene?
A request. And because I'm the Philosophy board moderator.
turtle wrote:ONLY--------It sounded like a warning to me. I know you are the Philosophy board moderator. What I was asking-------what exactly do you want from me? Do you want me to write different words. As moderator please be more specific. Is there no thesis? . Do you want to send this thread somewhere else unless we do something different. Do it. You are the moderator.
Only_Humean wrote:Either discuss philosophy, please, or request a move to a more relevant board.

jonquil
On that basis I wish to declare that anyone can be as fucked up as they like just because they think so, and as unfucked up as they please on the same basis. Legitimizing this declaration, however, is a matter for the courts and the system of jurisprudence which I assiduously endeavor to avoid at all times, being of sound enough mind and body to know that "the law is a ass
WW_III_ANGRY wrote:
Cool. #1 reminded me of my skittle wars. I would separate the skittles by colors to form their armies. (Hmm almost made my skittles seem to be racist nations looking back on it). Anyways I'd smash opposing colors together and the one that was destroyed I ate (the spoils of war) and the one that was not destroyed lived to fight another battle. I particularly remember favoring the orange nation of skittles, I enjoyed amassing as many of those as I could and saving for them for the last great battle.
uglypeoplefucking wrote:1) i only eat once a day - it's more like a feeding than a meal - i'll eat a whole day's worth of food in one sitting (actually, i frequently eat standing up)
2) i never wear shorts unless i'm swimming - i don't care how hot it gets
3) my screen name is uglypeoplefucking
4) on a daily basis, i find myself intensely scared and sad for no discernible reason - this will usually last for between six and eight hours at a time
5) i hate watching sports - any sport - with an absolute passion unparalelled by anything else in my life - worse than that, i hate sports commentary - it can literally make my skin crawl, my nose run, and cause me to see spots
6) i'll often begin to weep when i get embarrassed on someone else's behalf - for instance, i listen to a lot of call-in radio shows, and whenever a caller says something really stupid or inane, which happens more often than not, i'll start to cry a little bit.
7) i don't vote, but only because it's not worth getting jury duty
8.) i whisper long strings of profanities in my sleep, often for as much as 15 to 20 minutes at a stretch (i have no memory of doing so, but i've had several girlfreinds tell me about it)
9) without caffeine, marijuana, and bourbon, i am nothing - seriously, i'm good as dead without those three substances
10) i've been known to respond to the voices in my head by writing messages in duct tape on the walls and ceiling of my room
11) i'm philosophically opposed to the capitalization of the "I" pronoun
12) my list of the top ten reasons why i am fucked up contains twelve items
jonquil wrote:There is a bit of OCD in your habits, but I see them as attempts to control your world. It's like setting up habitual or addictive control patterns. But even that can show its own kind of control which, when you are able to see it, you attempt to gain control over by deliberately breaking it up a little or changing it around. I think it would be interesting for you to find out what happens when you let the habit go completely. If you start to get withdrawal symptoms, feeling nervous, emotional, or out of control, you know the former habit was a behavior you set up in order not to feel those feelings. If, then, you were to allow yourself to have those feelings completely and just wallow in them till they burned themselves out, you would suddenly find yourself free of compulsions and able to think and act with amazing clarity and creativity. It would be a very difficult process while going through it, but afterwards it would feel so good, I think.
Pav wrote: Yup, officially fucked up.

PavlovianModel146 wrote:WW_III_ANGRY wrote:
Cool. #1 reminded me of my skittle wars. I would separate the skittles by colors to form their armies. (Hmm almost made my skittles seem to be racist nations looking back on it). Anyways I'd smash opposing colors together and the one that was destroyed I ate (the spoils of war) and the one that was not destroyed lived to fight another battle. I particularly remember favoring the orange nation of skittles, I enjoyed amassing as many of those as I could and saving for them for the last great battle.
That's pretty cool, I did the same thing with different color army pieces when I was a kid, I usually favored the Blue Army.
Nice to see you again, been awhile.
Humpty wrote:What's the standard by which you can say "Most people are mentally healthy"?
For me, it would be that of being able to or trying to face reality to the fullest and to look/peer honestly into one' s self and maybe even greater than that - to have the capacity to suffer (not masochistically) but for their own growth...not to run from suffering but to dive into it and to come out the other side. I think, in actuality, they go hand in hand.Humpty wrote:What's the standard by which you can say "Most people are mentally healthy"?

What's the standard by which you can say "Most people are mentally healthy"?
Most people do this? I don't think so.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users