Yes but so was killing Bin Laden… perhaps? Not entirely… there is some truth to that though. Now as far as the burial at sea, right… Was that the right thing to do also? 
guess you missed the point of what i said…
No, I didn’t. I didn’t say the ceremony was an entirely traditional and entirely founded in Muslim burial rites.
the post that preceded mine was talking about burying him at sea for moral reasons. i was commenting on that. it was claimed, in the news, to have been done in keeping with muslim traditions. none of your response has anything to do with what i was talking about. that’s why i say you missed the point. cuz you’re talkin bout some random shit.
So it was in concordance with muslim tradition except for the burial at sea… And?
and that was it, what the fuck do you mean “and?” get outta here
How could you proclaim that I missed your point if there’s nothing more to what you already stated? I asked if the burial at sea was the right thing to do. You said I missed your point. WTF?
you said “also” you asked if it was the right thing to do “also.”
that part confused the shit outta me. your whole post was like…i have no clue what you’re trying to say. speak english man.
I said exactly what I was trying to say. You can answer the question anyway you want. I don’t see how its confusing at all. I’m not trying to trick you.
i’m not answering the question. the also implies that something else IS right already…i don’t know what that is. i personally couldn’t care less where he’s buried, they could have fed his corpse to hyenas for all I care, the point is that they claimed it was done in keeping with islamic tradition in order to appease muslims who might be outraged by how they disposed of the body, but the way they disposed of the body is against islamic tradition anyway.
Or I was just asking a second question on the burial.
ah, i see, in that case the also should be placed in front. if it’s at the end like that…my misunderstanding was pretty understandable.
Is that a Grammatical rule? I’m not sure… do you know?
“Was that the right thing to do also?” – the also is in the context of there being another right thing to do.
“Also, was that the right thing to do?” – the also is to denote a new, separate question.
Yes the question is that is the first rule exclusive and couldn’t possibly refer to a new separate question?
That’s just what WW# says when he is trying to obfuscate and protect the false flaggers.
Hmmm… I put the word also in an ambiguous spot to protect false flaggers?
Humpty is right.
[i]It must be understood that while this information was furnished by reliable sources, there are many different opinions between those of Muslim faith, and any Muslim contemplating cremation or burial at sea should seek proper council .
[/i]
-
- If a person dies on a ship and if there is no fear of the decay of the dead body and if there is no problem in retaining it for sometime on the ship, it should be kept on it and buried in the ground after reaching the land. Otherwise, after giving Ghusl, Hunut, Kafan and Namaz-e-Mayyit it should be lowered into the sea in a vessel of clay or with a weight tied to its feet. And as far as possible it should not be lowered at a point where it is eaten up immediately by the sea predators.
-
If it is feared that an enemy may dig up the grave and exhume the dead body and amputate its ears or nose or other limbs, it should be lowered into sea, if possible, as stated in the foregoing rule.
Show me the rule of Grammar where it means it must explicitly be only referring to that there is another right thing to do!