Osama bin Laden is Dead.

you said “also” you asked if it was the right thing to do “also.”
that part confused the shit outta me. your whole post was like…i have no clue what you’re trying to say. speak english man.

I said exactly what I was trying to say. You can answer the question anyway you want. I don’t see how its confusing at all. I’m not trying to trick you.

i’m not answering the question. the also implies that something else IS right already…i don’t know what that is. i personally couldn’t care less where he’s buried, they could have fed his corpse to hyenas for all I care, the point is that they claimed it was done in keeping with islamic tradition in order to appease muslims who might be outraged by how they disposed of the body, but the way they disposed of the body is against islamic tradition anyway.

Or I was just asking a second question on the burial.

ah, i see, in that case the also should be placed in front. if it’s at the end like that…my misunderstanding was pretty understandable.

Is that a Grammatical rule? I’m not sure… do you know?

“Was that the right thing to do also?” – the also is in the context of there being another right thing to do.
“Also, was that the right thing to do?” – the also is to denote a new, separate question.

Yes the question is that is the first rule exclusive and couldn’t possibly refer to a new separate question?

That’s just what WW# says when he is trying to obfuscate and protect the false flaggers.

Hmmm… I put the word also in an ambiguous spot to protect false flaggers?

Humpty is right.

[i]It must be understood that while this information was furnished by reliable sources, there are many different opinions between those of Muslim faith, and any Muslim contemplating cremation or burial at sea should seek proper council .

[/i]

    • If a person dies on a ship and if there is no fear of the decay of the dead body and if there is no problem in retaining it for sometime on the ship, it should be kept on it and buried in the ground after reaching the land. Otherwise, after giving Ghusl, Hunut, Kafan and Namaz-e-Mayyit it should be lowered into the sea in a vessel of clay or with a weight tied to its feet. And as far as possible it should not be lowered at a point where it is eaten up immediately by the sea predators.
  1. If it is feared that an enemy may dig up the grave and exhume the dead body and amputate its ears or nose or other limbs, it should be lowered into sea, if possible, as stated in the foregoing rule.

Show me the rule of Grammar where it means it must explicitly be only referring to that there is another right thing to do!

Grammar isn’t my bag, talk to Tab about that, but it’s shown clearly by the two sentences that Humpty is correct.

“Was that the right thing to do also?” – The implication is that you’ve already found one “right thing to do”, and you’re wondering if a second thing could be a “right thing to do”.

“Also, was that the right thing to do?” – The implication is that you don’t know if it’s the right thing and you’re looking for outside input.

I agree that is the case, but since there was no discussion that a right thing to do was found it wouldn’t logically follow that also was utilized to convey that there was. I don’t think it is a Grammatical necessity that “was that the right thing to do also” that also must include strictly as to finding another right thing as opposed to asking another question. In my context which is why I didn’t say “Also, was that the right thing to do” somewhat could refer to an indicator that we are moving beyond the original question of the ceremonial burial, but my goal was to revise the question to be inclusive of was the ceremonial burial the right thing to do as well as was dumping him at sea the right thing to do? I didn’t wish to advance beyond it since the first question wasn’t answered, thus no judgement of right or wrong made. Which is why I see the also following my last sentence to not be inclusive of making something seem to be rectified as “right” when we didn’t comes to terms on the matter. I typically wouldn’t use also in the beginning of a sentence either I think that is not really proper. But going back on it seems I missed a comma in it all which seems to be the error I made… It should have been, “Was that the right thing to do, also”

No, you drone on and on claiming lack of understanding so as to obfuscate (“but I don’t see the evidence”).
:unamused:

Uh huh, I’m just detail oriented. You jump to conclusions apparently.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfzE_TK-zmQ&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]

The guy says(Sekulow) “they define pro-lifers as domestic terroirsts…now saying pro-lifers people that believe end-time prophies, people opposed to this administration position on immigration, those of us standing up for the sanctity of life and marriage…all of those are now potential - this is what they are saying - domestic terrorists.”

This is the problem with conspiracy theories, or atleast a lot of them, they are forwarded and articulated by people who are oppressively right wing, and actively puruse an end that is arguably worse than the conspiracy. This fucking guy is on the board of an institute set up by Pat Robertson specifically to oppose the ACLU, and from what I can tell he has positioned himself to obtain financial gain by getting right-wing people to believe this shit. He runs right-wing issue non-profits and pays himself millions. No different than a televangelists.

Here’s the document he’s talking about: fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf

It doesn’t mention “prophesy people” at all, and mentions abortion several times because of America’s long history with right-wing abortion based terrorism - it mention immigration for the same reason. It concludes only that abortion and immigration may be an issue hateful people use as a rallying point for violence, and that right-wing violence has historically been amplified during economic downturns. Since this was released abortion providers have been killed, local “militia’s” plans for violence have been thwarted, and ant-immigrant violence has increased around the world and in the U.S.

Here’s the FEMA camps:
popularmechanics.com/technol … ws/4312850

I know it’s a bullshit moneymaker just like religion

What’s your (anyone here) response to people claiming that it was “wrong” to shoot ObL as an unarmed man and he should have been arrested for trial and whatnot?