Actually a straight line is not defined as such at all. It is a shortest distance that has been defined as the straight line, not the other way around. But ISRT redefines length and distance so such semantical games are pointless and circular.
A straight line == the center line of an equal sided cylinder.
About Euclidean’s space and Vacuum’s space.
Everybody knows what Euclidean’s space is.
Question: what is Vacuum?“Remember gentlemen, we have not proven
the aether does not exist, we have only proven we do not
need it (for mathematical purposes)”…
Glad someone else noticed that besides me.
/ Einstein’s famous University of Leyden lecture
of May 5, 1920./" The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? "
I can not only define it, but prove aether. But that is no short story.
/ Paul Dirac ./
Herman Minkowski said about his minus 4D
spacetime continuum:
“ Henceforth, space by itself, and time by itself,
are doomed to fade away into mere shadows,
and only a kind of union of the two will
preserve an independent reality.”
Question. What is the “a kind of union of the two “?
Nobody knows what really Minkowski space is .
Minkowski space is the result of assumptions from ISRT wherein portions of reality must disappear entirely
In Wikipedia we can read:
“ Unfortunately neither the concept of space nor of time is well defined,
resulting in a dilemma. If we don’t know the character of time nor of space,
how can we characterize either? “
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime
I’ll be taking care of that shortly