Latent Psychic Ability in the Religious, and Athiest

I have no idea, the overview does not offer nearly enough detail to know. It’s all clear on P-values, statistical principles, possible problems, types of evidence, the history of the literature, the stated results, and brief overviews of each studies methodology. But as we know, untill the data collection is reviewed, that doesn’t mean anything.

Actually it does. You could have just picked one, or all, but instead you want to waste time.

Seeing as how no one wants to focus on the data, we’ll move onto another study.

LOL

Homework: pick a study and see if you can find something wrong with the methodology.

Na, I’m still trying to figure out why someone would read or post studies if the data doesn’t matter.

(btw the dude (Hyman) working with the statistician in these is a Psychologist)

No, you’re avoiding looking at data because it’s supporting a thesis you would rather not be correct.

Statisticians cannot preform scientific inquiry…
Now I know I have you on the ropes.

I’m starting to think your guys’ form of argumentation here is ‘Well I didn’t read that part.’

Are you saying they don’t go over the methodology in study I posted?
That they only mentioned the statistical outcomes?
Is that what you’re saying? If so, it’s wrong.

If you want to say, ‘She is a statistician, and because I haven’t read all the details, it immediately invalidates everything presented’ that is a ridiculous statement. As far as I can tell, that is what you’re saying.

If you don’t want to look at the evidence I will just assume you don’t want to because it’s not the type of evidence you want to see.

LOL

Still waiting for a study of your choosing.

You can choose a study to analyze, or you can keep making excuses as to why you refuse to look at any information.

I’ve brought all this information together. It’s not my job to say ‘here, read this specifically, then that,’ and all this stuff. If you don’t want to make any effort here than it’s pretty obvious what your intentions are.

Geeezz…

Tit-tat
Tit-tat
Is there a rat?
Where is the cat?

I could choose, but I want you to. I don’t know which study to choose based on any criterion. You posted the overview, so hopefully you may know which study is the most famous, which study is considered the most legitimate, ect. If you don’t, just say, and i’ll choose one randomly. Just don’t complain that I chose the worst one when I do.

LOL, you wrote the meta-review or posted a single link?

My choice is for you to study them all individually, and then as a whole with regards to the conclusions from the meta-view.

If you don’t want to do that, then look at them all quickly and choose the weakest one carried out by a researcher from a discipline you find to be the least scientific.

I also kind of need you to align yourself with one the studies, otherwise it will be like last time. Where you just go from study to study quoting it’s conclusion, and I’m the only one that reads them all and tries to understand them. It was far too one-sided. You get one study this time.

James, do you know anything about these? Are some baby-land frolics and others legit?

Have you not figured this out yet, Wobbly? If you disagree with him it’s because you either haven’t read what he posted, haven’t read it carefully enough, or you’re just an idiot. Duh.

Yeah, that’s just smoke an mirrors though, a behavior he has acquired recently. Let us hope for his sake that I don’t decide it’s not worth the effort to pry some authenticity out of him.

Yes, many are “legit”. Although I stopped looking into them many years ago after being so thoroughly disappointed in Man’s ability to rationally deduce what he is looking at.

They are legit in the sense that they can display that the mind is more perceptive to minuscule tidbits of data than people realize. The question as to whether the mind is performing unknowable feats of magical perception is a false and senseless question.

How about if I choose one;

So now… where is the trick?

kk, I’ll read it and then bounce my problems with it back to you(if I find any).

After this, I have a few experiences that might be of interest along these same lines involving that mystical “ethereal plane”.