Does Spirit Evolve?

…a part of this entity, infact, eventually up to half the contents of the universe could become this entity, whick, like any good evoutionary theory, dosen’t require altruism to work, infact, extreme altruism or egoism would be a cancer upon this entity, Megaform, God or whatever you want to call it. Spirt survives best when working with matter and vice versa, although that which is more spirited and/or more orderly must rule over that which is less spirited and less, whilst still respecting it, lest it is the lowest form of matter and chaos. My theory favours progressive, international collectivist fascism, it is a progressive and cosmological fascism. Justice between the collective shall be the order of the day, conditional love/hate, it’s the opposite species of fascism our friend Satyr espouses. It is progressive, but there is nothing external making it so, we must make it so. Dare I say the Megaform, the progressive, spiritive/materiative, hierarchical omnisymbiosis, or omnisymbiote is the meaning of…

…of existence, let me hear you proclaim it is the meaning of the universe. Life, order, spirit, awareness, the progressive, the collective, collaborating with but presiding over nonlife, chaos, matter, unawareness, the regressive, the individual. God, being and essence don’t yet exist, instead they are a lofty ideal to strive for, one that may never be fully realized and made manifest, but that is part of the fun.

Perhaps in addition to chaotic matter and individuation, the lowest forms of being, we are opposed by dark orderly spirit, or dark collectivization, a higher form of being that only hierarchically collaborates with itself in order to disrupt our burgeoning/formative hierarchical collaboration, a omnisymbiote that favours, not itself, but it’s opposite. Such a force, if it exists, would be the antithesis of my God.

Can you define time? In relevance to your theory,Nothing else

Time is change, or the mental record of change.

Time is the relative speed of change.

By now, I’m sure most of you have figured out I believe (not firmly though) in reincarnation of the soul, however, the soul is not definitely immortal and must continue to evolve or die. I’m not sure how this works, but the process probably works similarly to materitive evolution. In the spirit world, nothing is safe and spirit life must either compete or collaborate with other spirit life or spirit nonlife in order to survive, souls can consume and be consumed.

What and how are the souls consuming?Evolution to connect with one another is always good but not for the sake of progression.That is based on time which is eternally contained within a mental state. A spirit is free it must create fluidity with other spirits by being compassionate.I, like yourself believe that we are some how God not the god but a part of God and that is what he is trying to do with creation,make itself unite by free will, Just like the body or a mental state if you have passion it will consume your soul to whtaever your passion,and thus if your passion lies in the right place you remain infinite. you just are,instead of become becoming or became.Thus God is trying to give himself freewill while maintaing order and chaos as the backbone to freewill by using humans and the spirit.If a spirit has to compete it is not free.Evolution is What?survival of the fittest?Animals already live by that way before we figured it out.What then is the separation?Why the confusion?Why is evolution so natural to us but something about us is unnatural and it combats our spirit and neglects evolution.As children we are prone to being free yet evolution restrains in order to maintain order.

Well, you can return to the primordial, monistic dissolution all you like,where all dichotomies and pluralities have synthesized, and there is only a quantum like nothingness/somethingness, but that is not where I’m headed, at least, not yet. If you want companionship and reassurance on your way to Hades, perhaps you should talk to Abstract. I’m proposing a synthesis between Parmenides and Heraclitus. extreme altruism/egoism = death. If you remain staunchly committed to your Parmenidean paradigm, then I’m affraid there is no place for you in my Omnisymbiote. Perhaps you can construct your own metaphysical kingdom. Feel free to post it here.

eyesinthedark do you have any solid prove of your claim? Or is it just some imagination running wild?

Yes, life is evolving, even now as we speak, into a unified whole. See how pigs, cows, humans, our crops, machines, robots, computers, individuals, and races work together. Well, at this rate, eventually humans, through technology, will psychically link with computers, machines, robots, and animals, and we’ll be like one giant brain.

SO im guessing this applies to you?one brain and your the only one to have understood the telos?Okay I guess you forgot to understand that people will never follow this not only because it is based on one idea, unification not unity.Removal of self and yes i know this is exactly what you are stating and yes i know your ego will not let you have an open mind and yes i know that you probably think my feelings are hurt and you know what they are and at least I am not afraid to accept myself.O yeah and I know this doesn’t matter but hey there is always hope.But in the end your idea is very well thought out.what about independence because even a single minded mind needs independence from something from chaos.what does chaos offer in your theory?Just competition or something more?

I Don’t think the soul/spirit evolves in the usual sense but I have thought of life as a type of education or journey for the soul.

I forgot which philosopher it was, Ill post it later if I find out.
This philosopher said something along the lines of God is closeness and unity of all things and that our universe is chaotic and confrontational because we are seperated from this oneness.

I’ll need too look it up again but basically the idea was, Before the rest of existance there was God, then for what we know of existance to occur God fractured, split apart if you will to form all these things that are. You me, rocks, planets, galaxy’sand everything elses.

I won’t speak more on this as I can’t recollect it all at this moment but basically the Idea is, God Fractured= Existance as we know it, The reunification of all things= Perfect God.

I think I’m the first one, but I’ve had many influences.

What’s the difference between unification and unity? You mean, a pluralistic unification vs a monism?

Not sure what you’re getting at here.

Thank you.

Chaos is evil, it is antithetical to life. Competative collaboration, Omnisymbiosis is not chaos, are the cells in your body chaos? maybe if they’re feeding off each other and offering nothing in return, like a cancer. However, and this may sound somewhat contradictory, life needs chaos in order to exist. Life is but the antagonism between order and chaos. That is why we should not remove chaos completely, just minimize it. We must increase Omnisymbiosis as much as possible, Omnisymbiosis is order.

Yeah, I’m not sure if it does either, it is esoteric, occultic, a mystery to us all, but this life is no mystery. I think we should devout more of our resources to trying to find and figure out if spirit, that is, if subjects can exist apart from objects, exists. It just seems logical to me, although admittedly difficult to fathom, that if matter is becoming, mortal, in substance and form, then spirit ought to be becoming, mortal in substance and form. Strange I know.

I guess this is a great theory once it is put in too action I will be waiting to puncture holes for I am Chaos and not the evil one the good one the one that defies omnisymbiosis. Not because I want to but because I have Life.I cant wait to see you on the news brudder man.

Now we are talking about something else. We’re talking about the death of substance and form, of matter and spirit. We’re talking about extreme monism and monism is nothing… and something. We want to protect what we are, we don’t want to die. To protect what we are, we have to competatively collaborate with some things we are not, to some degree. How much I guess depends, hence the will towards individualism and collectivism, regressivism and progressivism, egoism and altruism, hedonism and asceticism, nature and artifice. Sometimes we have to give up parts of ourself in order to keep others. Because our planet will one day die, the only way to save ourselves is to become an Omnisymbiote, so we can maintain our existence or a portion of it for all eternity. In a way, Omnisymbiote and the intellect, socialization and collectivization, is death and life. HAHA! I’m a little puzzled. Perhaps Satyr could give us some advice, he’s the smartest person I have ever met, even though I know he would disagree with me on most things, I respect him.

I understand, this God is the union of all opposites and pluralitites. We want to increase one opposite, yin, the positive one, life, all manner of pleasure, joy, knowledge and understanding, as much as possible.

Right, this is death, the death of form, of substance, of duality, of plurality.

Thank you for participating in my thread, and I hope you will participate in the process of Omnisymbiosis and not choose to commit suicide or homicide and return to the something/nothing.

you are advanced

true