Moderator: Only_Humean
I already posted the OP. If you didnt read that, then I have little intention of repeating myself.
Dglgmut wrote:We don't control what we think ought to be.
Dglgmut wrote:Morality is self-serving, as each of us has our own concept of what should be. As long as we follow our own moral code, we are being selfish.
phyllo wrote:I already posted the OP. If you didnt read that, then I have little intention of repeating myself.
If I had not read it, I would not have posted. Presumably when you start a thread, you want to talk about your views ... but in this case the OP is all there is?
But those with greater actualized consciousnesses are able to perceive these things more clearly, within the contextual universe
Dglgmut wrote:We don't control what we think ought to be. This we may as well accredit to the Universe, as it is more fundamental than our capacity to reason.
Morality is self-serving, as each of us has our own concept of what should be. As long as we follow our own moral code, we are being selfish.
Duality wrote:Dglgmut wrote:We don't control what we think ought to be.
I'd say we might to an extent, where the actualization of thought is contextual to the finite universe. But again, this a free will vs. determinism debate.

Duality wrote:Those who say that one can create their own meaning to existence independent of these realities are in fact, and will remain, as nothing more than ineffectual eunuchs. Their philosophies lead to nothing more than impotent nothingness, and their lives are nothing but a squandered and macabre freak show. So they are seen, and so they will be seen unto the end of time.
phyllo wrote:All meanings are derived from interpretations of reality except in the case of mentally ill individuals.
Duality wrote:The whole point of this thread is that I am basically scrapping materialism, empiricism and blind dogma as impotent and ineffective limitations (at best, and destructive entities at worst) to the individual's experience of life.
phyllo wrote:You are suggesting that 'hearing voices' is a 'real world' experience? I would say that it is entirely fabricated in the brain and is merely a thought.He's not?
phyllo wrote:Yes, I am. It happens in time and space, it has a primary cause and it has supporting conditions. Are you suggesting there is a clear line differentiating the sane from the insane? "Sane" people function in precisely the same way.
The primary cause seems to originate in the brain and not real world events.

Duality wrote:
I actually created this thread out of pity for all the depressed materialist atheists I constantly see on here and across the internet. These guys just seem so desperate and fragile, that I would feel like a vile subhuman rodent if I didn’t at least put this out there for those that needed it.
Duality wrote:plumbing the depths of the universe. All the purest essences of life must be absorbed and digested.
Duality wrote:I am basically scrapping materialism, empiricism and blind dogma
Dglgmut wrote:All we can do is discover new beliefs, but there must be a motivating belief already in place to push us to do so...But those with greater actualized consciousnesses are able to perceive these things more clearly, within the contextual universe
This relates to my understanding that the more self-conscious someone is, the less information they actually reveal about themselves. If you are fully aware of otherness, you allow yourself to react in the way you were "designed" to.
captaincrunk wrote:Duality wrote:Dglgmut wrote:We don't control what we think ought to be.
I'd say we might to an extent, where the actualization of thought is contextual to the finite universe. But again, this a free will vs. determinism debate.
Actually, I think the debate is appropriate. I disagree with determinism, but I also know we can't choose what to believe, only what evidence we look for.
captaincrunk wrote:If you don't have anything to replace it with you are only leaving us blind.
volchok wrote:Duality wrote:
I actually created this thread out of pity for all the depressed materialist atheists I constantly see on here and across the internet. These guys just seem so desperate and fragile, that I would feel like a vile subhuman rodent if I didn’t at least put this out there for those that needed it.
Yes, yes, the theist has his all seeing father up there in sky taking care of him, intervening in his life, and making sure his personal plan is accomplished and yet the atheist is the desperate and fragile one.
Oh the irony.?
volchok wrote:Duality wrote:plumbing the depths of the universe. All the purest essences of life must be absorbed and digested.
Wtf does this actually mean?
And regardless of what it does mean, didn't you just created your own meaning by saying that?
volchok wrote:Duality wrote:I am basically scrapping materialism, empiricism and blind dogma
Isn't the act of postualing that the true meaning is ONLY achievable by plumbing the depth of the universe , blind dogma?
Duality wrote:captaincrunk wrote:If you don't have anything to replace it with you are only leaving us blind.
I did in the OP.

captaincrunk wrote:This isn't a replacement for reason.
It's easy to argue that events manufactured by the brain do not correspond to external events for anyone - simply because of the limitations of the sense organs. We only hear a limited range of sounds, see only certain colors, have a very weak sense of smell, only feel relative temperatures, etc. That is not what the OP is talking about. The OP seems to be about people creating their own meaning out of nothing. To which I responded that everyone creates their own meaning but it is based on real world experience. The huge range of human experience produces lots of meanings. I don't think that it is possible to reject, for example, materialism as being ineffective. A useful philosophical point of view is subjective. There are hard determinists here who are not crippled by the consequences of that POV while others are depressed by it. If a philosophy is not working for you then drop it. A philosophy is a way you choose to interact with the world - it is not the world - the world simply IS. Adopt an attitude which produces positive results for you. Do more research. Think more. Ask instead of answering.I don't think you can say, however, that events in the brain are not real world events. Furthermore, all experience is manufactures by our brains. Our eyes don't see, our brains do. Our ears don't hear, our brains do.
You might indeed say that the events manufactured by the brain in the case of insane people fail to correspond to events external to the brain. But that's a little bit different.
phyllo wrote:The primary cause seems to originate in the brain and not real world events. If a person is hearing voices then I would say that they are not sane. Sane people do not function the same way.
The great majority of religious minds are not sick. If the obligations of religion were so negative, they would have been abandoned long ago. The simple fact is that belief in God and religious rites is beneficial to human existence both on individual and community levels.the sick will of all religious minds, is to impose negative obligations as regular reference for all humankind,
phyllo wrote: If a philosophy is not working for you then drop it. A philosophy is a way you choose to interact with the world - it is not the world - the world simply IS. Adopt an attitude which produces positive results for you. Do more research. Think more. Ask instead of answering.
phyllo wrote: If the obligations of religion were so negative, they would have been abandoned long ago.
I have my meaning, he has his meaning and both are tenuously related to some external reality.The assumption of reality arises because of its being communicated to me. If communication fails alltogether, meanings of’ realities’ and things is lost.
If you try to grasp it, it's not there.edit: I don't mean to say that the knowledge of what is given as 'reality' is Reality.
The tao that can be described
is not the eternal Tao.
The name that can be spoken
is not the eternal Name.
. Man being both infinite consciousness and sentient being, his life is not defined by any external entity as .
The universe is an entity to be actively experienced through an actualized and developed consciousness
That means get out there and honestly actualize your own reality. Start a fight, drink a wine, perform a play, lose a love, watch the gleaming sunset over the mountains and feel one with the pulsating universe.
When one sees oneself as an insignificant puppet on a cosmic string, all the juice, vigour and beauty is drained out of life.
As the true method of knowledge is experiment the true faculty of knowing must be the faculty which experiences, This faculty I treat of
I have nothing but pity, but so it is when you follow a eunuch philosophy, so you will experience a eunuch existence.
The simple fact is that belief in God and religious rites is beneficial to human existence both on individual and community levels.
People keep doing the same things over and over again because it's useless and makes them miserable. Right?Pure nonsense.
phyllo wrote:People keep doing the same things over and over again because it's useless and makes them miserable. Right?
Religion causes AIDS? Whoa.I would love to see you tell all the millions who died of aids, to the gays, to woman, to pretty much all minorities, to all the millions that died throughout history on religious wars, t, how belief in god/religion/faith is beneficial.
You don't give people very much credit.Also, the main reason why people keep doing the same things over and over is indoctrination combined with lack of knowledge.
Users browsing this forum: obe