Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

The origins of the imperative, "know thyself", are lost in the sands of time, but the age-old examination of human consciousness continues here.

Moderator: MagsJ

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby indoz » Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:01 pm

Moreno wrote:Of course, as all things are subjective. so what?
So reacting to someone dehumanizing you is a natural inevitable thing.[/quote]

Not really, nobody has to be nice.
indoz
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:01 am

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby Moreno » Fri Dec 23, 2011 5:23 am

indoz wrote:
Moreno wrote:Of course, as all things are subjective. so what?
So reacting to someone dehumanizing you is a natural inevitable thing.


Not really, nobody has to be nice.[/quote]That's what I am saying. If someone is racist at you and you react angrily, you are demonstrating that no one has to be nice. It seems like you want to be free to say whatever to other people but if they are bothered they have to shut up and stifle their anger.
Moreno
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5903
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:46 pm

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby Moreno » Fri Dec 23, 2011 5:24 am

indoz wrote:
Moreno wrote:As offence is subjective, and logically anything can offend, then it stands to reason that curbing offence makes no sense. Perhaps people should take it if others offend them.
Why? Why should people be free to say anything but others must muzzle their reactions?


Nobody has to respect others.[/quote]Precisely. No one has to respect a racist. It seems like you want other people to accept you and whatever you say, but you cannot grant them the same freedom.
Moreno
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5903
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:46 pm

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby indoz » Fri Dec 23, 2011 5:23 pm

As nobody has to be nice, then it stands to reason that people should suck it up.
indoz
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:01 am

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby Moreno » Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:36 pm

indoz wrote:As nobody has to be nice, then it stands to reason that people should suck it up.
I hope, for your sake, you are trolling.
That makes no sense. The person who does not like blacks can suck it up and keep his mouth shut. But you think its fine for him to express himself. Well, if it is fine for him, it is fine for the offended black person to express him or herself.

You are offended by people getting offended by racism. Why don't you suck it up instead of having a thread in a philosophy forum trying to convince them and everyone else to suck it up?

They don't have to be nice either. As you say, nobody has to be nice. That includes the people you want to suck it up.
Moreno
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5903
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:46 pm

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby indoz » Sat Dec 24, 2011 2:52 pm

why shouldn't people suck it up? it is about being a mentally fit person.
indoz
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:01 am

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby Moreno » Sat Dec 24, 2011 11:23 pm

indoz wrote:why shouldn't people suck it up? it is about being a mentally fit person.
Can you specifically address the issue I raised?
Moreno
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5903
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:46 pm

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby indoz » Sun Dec 25, 2011 3:40 pm

Moreno wrote:
indoz wrote:why shouldn't people suck it up? it is about being a mentally fit person.
Can you specifically address the issue I raised?


I did. It's about being mentally fit and recognising that people can act as they please in life.
indoz
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:01 am

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby indoz » Sun Dec 25, 2011 3:41 pm

Moreno wrote:
indoz wrote:As nobody has to be nice, then it stands to reason that people should suck it up.
I hope, for your sake, you are trolling.
That makes no sense. The person who does not like blacks can suck it up and keep his mouth shut. But you think its fine for him to express himself. Well, if it is fine for him, it is fine for the offended black person to express him or herself.

You are offended by people getting offended by racism. Why don't you suck it up instead of having a thread in a philosophy forum trying to convince them and everyone else to suck it up?

They don't have to be nice either. As you say, nobody has to be nice. That includes the people you want to suck it up.


Most people don't like blacks. it's common fact.
indoz
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:01 am

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby Moreno » Mon Dec 26, 2011 12:00 am

indoz wrote:
Moreno wrote:
indoz wrote:why shouldn't people suck it up? it is about being a mentally fit person.
Can you specifically address the issue I raised?


I did. It's about being mentally fit and recognising that people can act as they please in life.
No, you are not addressing the issue I raised. You want to be free to react to other people, but you do not want them to be free to react to you and what you do. See if you can focus on this issue, rather than repeating things you have already said.
Moreno
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5903
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:46 pm

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby Moreno » Mon Dec 26, 2011 12:01 am

indoz wrote:
Moreno wrote:
indoz wrote:As nobody has to be nice, then it stands to reason that people should suck it up.
I hope, for your sake, you are trolling.
That makes no sense. The person who does not like blacks can suck it up and keep his mouth shut. But you think its fine for him to express himself. Well, if it is fine for him, it is fine for the offended black person to express him or herself.

You are offended by people getting offended by racism. Why don't you suck it up instead of having a thread in a philosophy forum trying to convince them and everyone else to suck it up?

They don't have to be nice either. As you say, nobody has to be nice. That includes the people you want to suck it up.


Most people don't like blacks. it's common fact.
This is not, in any way, a response to the issue I raised.
Moreno
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5903
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:46 pm

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby indoz » Mon Dec 26, 2011 6:31 pm

Moreno wrote:
I did. It's about being mentally fit and recognising that people can act as they please in life.
No, you are not addressing the issue I raised. You want to be free to react to other people, but you do not want them to be free to react to you and what you do. See if you can focus on this issue, rather than repeating things you have already said.[/quote]

People have a right to dehumanise others.
indoz
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:01 am

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby indoz » Mon Dec 26, 2011 7:55 pm

Moreno wrote:
You are offended by people getting offended by racism. Why don't you suck it up instead of having a thread in a philosophy forum trying to convince them and everyone else to suck it up?

They don't have to be nice either. As you say, nobody has to be nice. That includes the people you want to suck it up.


Most people don't like blacks. it's common fact.[/quote]This is not, in any way, a response to the issue I raised.[/quote]

That's incidental. It's common knowledge that people should suck up to rude/offensive persons. As said, it's about being a mentally fit individual.
indoz
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:01 am

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby Moreno » Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:10 pm

indoz wrote:People have a right to dehumanise others.
In certain ways and not others, but people have a right to react angrily to ALL kinds of dehumanization. They don't have to stuff down their reactions to your racism or dehumanization of them. You really are going to have to get used to this.
Moreno
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5903
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:46 pm

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby Moreno » Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:13 pm

indoz wrote:
That's incidental. It's common knowledge that people should suck up to rude/offensive persons. As said, it's about being a mentally fit individual.
LOL. Maybe you are just taking the piss out of us. And you just have to suck it up to people who do not suck it up. I know this will be hard for you, but, well, suck it up. You still have not responded to this issue. The one where you want other people to suck it up, but you yourself go in whining and complaining about their behavior, and I mean on and on, and cannot suck it up yourself.

What a poor role model you are for your own philosophy.
Moreno
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5903
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:46 pm

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby indoz » Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:19 pm

lol... I'm just relaying what most persons deem the actions of a mentally fit/balanced person. One just works around rude/offensive people.
indoz
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:01 am

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby MagsJ » Thu Dec 29, 2011 3:20 am

Anyone can pretty much do and say whatever they want... as long as they are prepared for any resulting actions that may stem from it, which is why most people don't Indoz.
Examine what is said, not him who speaks.
~Arab Proverb
Imageaes dhammo sanantano Pali: 'this is the eternal law'

The Narcissist exists whereby every activity and relationship is defined by the hedonistic need to acquire the symbols of spiritual wealth, this becoming the only expression of rigid, yet covert, social hierarchies. It is a culture where liberalism only exists insofar as it serves a consumer society, and even art, sex and religion lose their liberating power.
User avatar
MagsJ
Triumvirate
 
Posts: 11899
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: London, England

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby Moreno » Thu Dec 29, 2011 3:33 am

indoz wrote:lol... I'm just relaying what most persons deem the actions of a mentally fit/balanced person. One just works around rude/offensive people.
So you can work around people who don't work around rude/offensive people, but react openly. But as far as I can see, people react all the time to rude offensive people by getting upset, angry, condemning what they did or said, etc. Perhaps you live in a nice Quaker village. Most people don't.

If you want to remain silent when people insult you or your group, you are utterly free to do this. None of us will take this away from you.
Moreno
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5903
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:46 pm

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby indoz » Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:26 pm

Moreno wrote:
indoz wrote:lol... I'm just relaying what most persons deem the actions of a mentally fit/balanced person. One just works around rude/offensive people.
So you can work around people who don't work around rude/offensive people, but react openly. But as far as I can see, people react all the time to rude offensive people by getting upset, angry, condemning what they did or said, etc. Perhaps you live in a nice Quaker village. Most people don't.

If you want to remain silent when people insult you or your group, you are utterly free to do this. None of us will take this away from you.


It depends, as stated.

Most say to kill rude people with kindness. In modern society, it is not deemed mentally fit to react aggressively. This is per how medical professionals deem it so, as stated in most medical texts.
indoz
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:01 am

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby Moreno » Thu Dec 29, 2011 3:02 pm

indoz wrote: It depends, as stated.

Most say to kill rude people with kindness.
No they don't. And they certainly don't follow this rule.
In modern society, it is not deemed mentally fit to react aggressively
I see people reacting angrily all the time. In most cases aggression is an overreaction. But this is just stacking the deck to introduce this word.
This is per how medical professionals deem it so, as stated in most medical texts.
Now you're talking about fields I work in and you are wrong. Only a very tiny number of loopy psychiatrists or psychologists would think, for example, that a black person who got very angry after being called a nigger was mentally unstable. Or that someone getting angry at someone being rude was mentally unstable. You are just making stuff up. And certainly none of them would judge someone unfit for 'condeming the offense', which is a highly rational response indicating a cognitive reaction.

There is nothing wrong with telling someone who cuts in front of me in the bank line that they are being rude - condemning the offense. If they tell me they are better than me, getting angry is really quite normal. If you want to kill them with kindness, go for it. I think this can be a great strategy in some cases.

But what you really seem to want is to be able to be rude and other people not react to you. As you know, this is not the norm, or why would you have this thread?
Moreno
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5903
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:46 pm

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby indoz » Thu Dec 29, 2011 10:25 pm

lol... Again, most medical texts state as such, since we cannot control the conduct of others. If you work in the field, kindly demonstrate the contrary. You should at least be able to cite texts/research to corroborate your point.
indoz
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:01 am

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby Moreno » Sat Dec 31, 2011 2:54 am

indoz wrote:lol... Again, most medical texts state as such, since we cannot control the conduct of others. If you work in the field, kindly demonstrate the contrary. You should at least be able to cite texts/research to corroborate your point.
I love how you always assume you can make statements without any support but if anyone disagrees, they bear the onus. You got pissed off at your brother which you described in the other thread. I use your own behavior to show that you, in fact, agree with me.

I notice you do not respond to specific arguments I make. I assume it is because you can't rebut the arguments in them.
Moreno
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5903
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:46 pm

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby indoz » Sat Dec 31, 2011 4:28 am

My basic argument is that society says to suck up to rudeness.
indoz
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:01 am

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby Moreno » Sat Dec 31, 2011 4:38 am

indoz wrote:My basic argument is that society says to suck up to rudeness.
So why didn't you when your brother was rude and didn't mind his own business?
Moreno
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5903
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:46 pm

Re: Why condemn offence, when it is a subjective phenomenon?

Postby indoz » Sat Dec 31, 2011 7:23 pm

Rudeness doesn't exist, all know this.
indoz
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:01 am

PreviousNext

Return to Psychology and Mind



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users