So reacting to someone dehumanizing you is a natural inevitable thing.[/quote]Moreno wrote:Of course, as all things are subjective. so what?
Not really, nobody has to be nice.
Moderator: MagsJ
So reacting to someone dehumanizing you is a natural inevitable thing.[/quote]Moreno wrote:Of course, as all things are subjective. so what?
indoz wrote:So reacting to someone dehumanizing you is a natural inevitable thing.Moreno wrote:Of course, as all things are subjective. so what?
indoz wrote:Why? Why should people be free to say anything but others must muzzle their reactions?Moreno wrote:As offence is subjective, and logically anything can offend, then it stands to reason that curbing offence makes no sense. Perhaps people should take it if others offend them.
I hope, for your sake, you are trolling.indoz wrote:As nobody has to be nice, then it stands to reason that people should suck it up.
Can you specifically address the issue I raised?indoz wrote:why shouldn't people suck it up? it is about being a mentally fit person.
Moreno wrote:Can you specifically address the issue I raised?indoz wrote:why shouldn't people suck it up? it is about being a mentally fit person.
Moreno wrote:I hope, for your sake, you are trolling.indoz wrote:As nobody has to be nice, then it stands to reason that people should suck it up.
That makes no sense. The person who does not like blacks can suck it up and keep his mouth shut. But you think its fine for him to express himself. Well, if it is fine for him, it is fine for the offended black person to express him or herself.
You are offended by people getting offended by racism. Why don't you suck it up instead of having a thread in a philosophy forum trying to convince them and everyone else to suck it up?
They don't have to be nice either. As you say, nobody has to be nice. That includes the people you want to suck it up.
No, you are not addressing the issue I raised. You want to be free to react to other people, but you do not want them to be free to react to you and what you do. See if you can focus on this issue, rather than repeating things you have already said.indoz wrote:Moreno wrote:Can you specifically address the issue I raised?indoz wrote:why shouldn't people suck it up? it is about being a mentally fit person.
I did. It's about being mentally fit and recognising that people can act as they please in life.
This is not, in any way, a response to the issue I raised.indoz wrote:Moreno wrote:I hope, for your sake, you are trolling.indoz wrote:As nobody has to be nice, then it stands to reason that people should suck it up.
That makes no sense. The person who does not like blacks can suck it up and keep his mouth shut. But you think its fine for him to express himself. Well, if it is fine for him, it is fine for the offended black person to express him or herself.
You are offended by people getting offended by racism. Why don't you suck it up instead of having a thread in a philosophy forum trying to convince them and everyone else to suck it up?
They don't have to be nice either. As you say, nobody has to be nice. That includes the people you want to suck it up.
Most people don't like blacks. it's common fact.
No, you are not addressing the issue I raised. You want to be free to react to other people, but you do not want them to be free to react to you and what you do. See if you can focus on this issue, rather than repeating things you have already said.[/quote]Moreno wrote:
I did. It's about being mentally fit and recognising that people can act as they please in life.
Moreno wrote:
You are offended by people getting offended by racism. Why don't you suck it up instead of having a thread in a philosophy forum trying to convince them and everyone else to suck it up?
They don't have to be nice either. As you say, nobody has to be nice. That includes the people you want to suck it up.
In certain ways and not others, but people have a right to react angrily to ALL kinds of dehumanization. They don't have to stuff down their reactions to your racism or dehumanization of them. You really are going to have to get used to this.indoz wrote:People have a right to dehumanise others.
LOL. Maybe you are just taking the piss out of us. And you just have to suck it up to people who do not suck it up. I know this will be hard for you, but, well, suck it up. You still have not responded to this issue. The one where you want other people to suck it up, but you yourself go in whining and complaining about their behavior, and I mean on and on, and cannot suck it up yourself.indoz wrote:
That's incidental. It's common knowledge that people should suck up to rude/offensive persons. As said, it's about being a mentally fit individual.
aes dhammo sanantano Pali: 'this is the eternal law'So you can work around people who don't work around rude/offensive people, but react openly. But as far as I can see, people react all the time to rude offensive people by getting upset, angry, condemning what they did or said, etc. Perhaps you live in a nice Quaker village. Most people don't.indoz wrote:lol... I'm just relaying what most persons deem the actions of a mentally fit/balanced person. One just works around rude/offensive people.
Moreno wrote:So you can work around people who don't work around rude/offensive people, but react openly. But as far as I can see, people react all the time to rude offensive people by getting upset, angry, condemning what they did or said, etc. Perhaps you live in a nice Quaker village. Most people don't.indoz wrote:lol... I'm just relaying what most persons deem the actions of a mentally fit/balanced person. One just works around rude/offensive people.
If you want to remain silent when people insult you or your group, you are utterly free to do this. None of us will take this away from you.
No they don't. And they certainly don't follow this rule.indoz wrote: It depends, as stated.
Most say to kill rude people with kindness.
I see people reacting angrily all the time. In most cases aggression is an overreaction. But this is just stacking the deck to introduce this word.In modern society, it is not deemed mentally fit to react aggressively
Now you're talking about fields I work in and you are wrong. Only a very tiny number of loopy psychiatrists or psychologists would think, for example, that a black person who got very angry after being called a nigger was mentally unstable. Or that someone getting angry at someone being rude was mentally unstable. You are just making stuff up. And certainly none of them would judge someone unfit for 'condeming the offense', which is a highly rational response indicating a cognitive reaction.This is per how medical professionals deem it so, as stated in most medical texts.
I love how you always assume you can make statements without any support but if anyone disagrees, they bear the onus. You got pissed off at your brother which you described in the other thread. I use your own behavior to show that you, in fact, agree with me.indoz wrote:lol... Again, most medical texts state as such, since we cannot control the conduct of others. If you work in the field, kindly demonstrate the contrary. You should at least be able to cite texts/research to corroborate your point.
So why didn't you when your brother was rude and didn't mind his own business?indoz wrote:My basic argument is that society says to suck up to rudeness.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]