Moderator: MagsJ
quetzalcoatl wrote:I can remember laying in my pram as a baby [6-ish months I assume] and my mother was hanging over the pram talking to me. I distinctly remember understanding her but that I couldn’t speak myself which frustrated me. Perhaps I added some stuff onto that memory but I remember it as a single memory [even though naturally its plural]. Next to that I remember my mum catching me eating coal in the coal shed at the age of about 1 ½ I think.
Interesting, quetz. Our daughter ate dog biscuits with charcoal. I figured she needed a mineral she found in charcoal. Her doctor agreed. So she teethed on dog biscuits rather than melba toast.
Apparently the description of the house, means I was about 2 or 3.
quetzalcoatl wrote:Apparently the description of the house, means I was about 2 or 3.
Interesting, why?
I can remember being in a pram and hence the pram in a room, I couldn’t speak so I assume I was younger than 1 or so. Maybe a single memory remained while the others were superseded?
I described what I saw to my mother and she told me that had to be when we lived in a house in Helston, which is when I was 2 or 3. Which is what I mean by describing the geography. The bath was to the right of the front door, there were stairs straight ahead, and what I thought might be a living room to the left. Now I probably didn't know the words for them all at the time, but I still retain the images so that someone with perspective could explain it to me.
quetzalcoatl wrote:I described what I saw to my mother and she told me that had to be when we lived in a house in Helston, which is when I was 2 or 3. Which is what I mean by describing the geography. The bath was to the right of the front door, there were stairs straight ahead, and what I thought might be a living room to the left. Now I probably didn't know the words for them all at the time, but I still retain the images so that someone with perspective could explain it to me.
Right so firstly we have to remove linguistic memories from what would have been remembered at the time, or at least those we wouldn’t have known then. My memory is visual and conceptual, so I assume visual memories are superseded ~ because we cant possibly remember all the visuals we see over time, hence this may be one of the reasons why we loose so much from our early lives?
I expect concepts gain depth [and the relationships of them to other memories may change] and take on linguistic form in due course too.

lizbethrose wrote:Anyone wonder what happened to the OP?
James S Saint wrote:One of the significant factors in causing the first memory to be the "first" that a person can recall is the emotional gestalt engrams set at the time which tend to overshadow prior less significant memories.
In my case, I have trouble remembering anything before this image of a stream of pee shooting up into the air and then something being thrown over me. In the sudden darkness I could first hear a rather disapproving voice quickly followed by a more, "it's okay" type of voice.
I am sure that I remember the event so well and not much before it due to the later embarrassment and seriously long bouts of concentrated flirting I had to do afterward before I was ever invited to another sorority kegger. But I made up for it in the long run.
lizbethrose wrote:After all, he has no more control over his penis as an infant that he has as an adult.

After all, he has no more control over his penis as an infant that he has as an adult.
Users browsing this forum: Ierrellus