Shook hands today with a rapist

Moved to MB.

Shaodw Topic Left in Place.

It is often said that since free will cannot be based on determinism - with its inevitable chains of cause and effect - or indeterminism - whether random or probablistic (a la QM) - and that since these are the only two options free will cannot be, period. I think it is best to be cautious especially with the kinds of limited, primate deduction we have available. What seems complete to us - in this case the random of possible causal to acausal schemes - may not be complete.

I think the whole kill the bacilli with antibiotic soaps after all potential germ exposure has really gotten out of hand. Rapists and people who commit crimes in hospitals, however, are more likely to have biohazadous touch, the latter potentially quite hazardous. One can only hope that herpes has made its way from victims genitals to the perpetrators hands and dick and from there to the wanker - both senses important for justice - in the OP.

I would like to know why you are calling Colin Powell a “degenerate criminal” and “rapist”

And I want to know if this is a redundant description or there is something else he did that earns the adjective degenerate!!!

I must lead an extra mundane life is this is Mundane Babble. I rarely shake hands with rapists whom I know are rapists and I have never heard anyone brag about this. I would call this Extraordinary. I think it does qualify as Babble, however, so my reaction is mixed.

Taking a page out of Romney’s playbook?

Alright. Just stop all of that please. Everyone just stop posting here. Gawd.

I should be left alone to act, and believe whatever I want. Is that too much to ask?

Life is about having fun and not really examining things.

I didn’t meet with any rapists today. Nor have I ever.

I called him a rapist to get a point across.

I called him a criminal because he is one.

Know what else I did today? Lavished around in a society built on the belief that our vanity should be funded by imperialist expansion into ‘brown people countries’ because ‘they are the fucking terrorists’

The people in government are just trying their best to provide us with wealth, and it’s hard to lead one-way slaughter invasions into third world countries. Those people deserve our respect and admiration.

This went right through my head.

What do you know about imperial expansion?

As a self declared imperialist I don’t really see what your talking about as what’s going on, ecoomic explotation isn’t synonymous with imperialism and neither is setting up more amiable goverments in foreign nations.

These things can and have been done by capitalist plutocrats and agreed upon by politicians that have other motivations for aggressive foreign policy.

Precisely why I posted my cod recipies.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1X-I-38lrU[/youtube]

Colin, we’re going to bomb the Towers, go to war, you’ll be compensated, obviously, maybe with some book deals about ‘Leadership’ or well, you know–whatever you want. If you’re in, great, if not—oh, what’s that? You’re in? Great. What do you need to say? It’s easy:

We just say he has weapons.
And they will believe us.

After? I don’t fucking care. Say whatever you want. Put it in your ‘leadership’ book. Laughs After… I mean these are Americans we’re talking about.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FejQH_VCB24[/youtube]

I prefer cod and rice.

An old trick of the mafia is to make sure corrupt people remain in power. They want people that will accept bribes, or bend to intimidation or something. The CIA became kindof like its own mafia and big business in some ways has become like the mafia too. That is part of why really corrupt guys get into positions of power in foreign countries. It’s a problem in capitalism because it becomes plutocracy, and drug lords can make allot of cash which then makes even more cash etc. And if it is a socialism then a dictator “revolutionary” violently seizes control of all the money and resources in the country. Each side, socialism and capitalism, is a polarized extreme which is subject to corruption, then both groups are played against one another as enemies and each one claims the other one is truly evil.

One thing that most people don’t realize is that not all humans are human.
When we are born we are typically innocent. Our original unconditioned nature is somewhat portrayed by our youth.
I remember when I was young. I did not wish death or control on anyone. I just wanted peace and friendship.
Allot of people start out like that, but humans have some issues with a weak immune system when it comes to issues of either physical or spiritual corruption.
This means that human existence is tragic.

“Having fun and not really examining things” is just a polarization of happiness mutated into escapism.
This form of polarized happiness is played against destructive things such as nihilism.
Each side is an extremism and as usual the two polarities battle it out as we’re forced into either one or the other or a non-thinking agnostic position.

We’ve got capitalism vs socialism
and atheism vs religion
and escapist happiness vs nihilist depression
and myth vs materialism.

I’m not sure why this duality keeps happening but it really sucks.
Both parties are F-ed.

Also Hussein was a good little dictator, but the only problem is that once he was put into power, he couldn’t be controlled. So they felt they had to take him out.

Normally a socialist dictatorship is great because all the power and wealth goes to one corruptible individual, which THEY then control quite easily, because it’s only one mind and one man in power. They would hate for the power to be in the minds of a very large group, because that would be much harder to control.

Meanwhile, the costs of a war sky rocket. So the guys who build and sell weapons are like “sweet i just won the lottery.”

Another war, yay, weapons, oil, and drugs, are the biggest business there is for cash. THEY want a few easily controllable people in charge of large amounts of drugs and weapons.

Also a one world government could possibly be a good thing. If it didn’t declare war on itself there’d be no war. We could combine all resources and share things and set up programs to end world hunger more easily and things like that.

I am beginning to think that the new world order is not an overt physical government.
The new world order is a single shadow government which tries to bribe and control all dictatorships and corporations in the world.
Like some sort of super mafia from hell.

Arguing both sides of an issue in the same paragraph.

Oh, I must be a pluralist. Vote for me! (I try to integrate as many threads as possible in each post)