Pagan communicatives

[Amorphos]

Pagan communicatives

Here I want to continue the themes concerning worldly communication networks as presented here:

Consciousness is the network
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=177829
Information communicates cyclically;
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=178004
The world lends itself to ones persuasion
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=177856


Firstly I am going to kill off the pagan deities in an attempt to de-anthropomorphise the whole thing [so just consider them gone].
Traditionally there were many deities representing all the ‘forces’ appearing to be at work in the world, so now I am going to strip back another layer and see those things in terms of communicative information networks.

Let us take an example in Aries the god of war; would there be a god of war, no, there would be conflicting CIN’s [communicative information networks]. If say you had two or more cultures with gods of war, both may assume that deity to be on their side, when in fact you’d have interests of differing parties [CIN’s}. these would relate to further parties and onto the world CIN [WCIN], with possibly many other parties being involved betwixt them. Such things are what we vaguely refer to as ‘the forces of history’.

So why would CIN’s be concerned with human matters; simply because we are not something outside of things, the subjective nature here doesn’t entirely exist, in that our minds are also conscious networks belonging to the web of such. As such they rely on external CIN’s and info generally in order to interact with the world; we could in fact see great world leaders such as Caesar and Genghis khan as belonging to localised networks, and their ultimate positions in the world as relating to the ‘desires’ of greater worldly forces [GCIN’s [G; general]], formerly referred to as ‘fate’.

How are CIN’s experienced, do they feel emotions? Again there isn’t anything outside of them, nature and everything that includes is part of them. The thoughts and emotions we and animals etc, have, relate to informations communicating, indeed it may be so that the very act of communicating is literally what we are, what life and non-life ‘is’, ~ relative to its manner{1}.

NCIN’s [nature CIN’s]; imagine e.g. a pack of wolves gathering to attack their prey, followed by the chase and the excitement of that, then finally the kill and the joy of that [naturally for the wolves]. CIN’s are informatively experiencing that as the totality of all relationships involved in the whole event, they also are the personal experience of the hunter and prey and as seen in the third person viewing the event [in informational terms]. we can perhaps see a similar thing in human terms with the representative deity Aries, and as concerns battles/war.

What I am getting at is an idea where communications are fundamentally what’s going on, as opposed to the singular experience of the world we think the world is an amalgamation of. As I see it there is always order and never noumenal informations and info sets ~ even within the hallowed sanctum of our inner most thoughts. Naturally things can remain private to us in terms of other individuals CIN’s, this is due to the differing languages used e.g. to make un-private our thoughts we must communicate them linguistically, yet CIN’s are conceptual informations and don’t understand things in English or any given language. Human language itself then is a layer above CIN’s or perhaps simply a different language, in the brain language relates to communications between objects [neuronal thoughts] which I assume is as different as info pertaining to the quantum and microscopic world, as compared to what you are reading right now.

{1} given conditions of certain arrangements of CIN’s produce e.g. life; where communications are kept flowing within a network [death where that stops], and [perhaps including] consciousness; where such communications have the degree of subjectivity required to make effect in the world, utilising the will to change informations.


_