Women Cause War

You’re going off track.

I’m not a trolley, I’m bound by my will and the horizons alone. The tangential still is capable of being effective, and all to often by slight of hand we discover it was central to the main idea all along. The cure doesn’t originate in the disease, it comes from without, tangential, yet fully within scope and quite correct to include. Just doesn’t appear so to the diseased mine. Know I am the cure to your disease.

I am the disease to your cure.

I find this presumptuous.

I cast my vote with this insightful analysis. :smiley:

Women cause war by being projection screens for men’s hallucinations. Instead of dealing with their fears of sexual inadequacy or not being lovable, men make assumptions about what women really want and then structure society to reflect this as much as they can. Men have done incredible damage by avoiding feeling their fears, transforming the anxiety into both action and anger and seeing other men as rivals and blaming women for not loving them. This huge freight train of momentum gets built up in society and men rush away from their fears without remembering this is the impetus and then blame women for the horrible sense of panic underlying their machinations.

How dare women exist and be desirable!

You’re stuck in your selfish, egotistical delusions.

You have yet to see how men are desirable to women, and for which reasons. Killing, raping, and murdering, in a woman’s name, is what wets the human female’s crotch faster than a garden hose. Women love violence…NOT when its directed at women and children themselves, but when it is directed at OTHER women and children. Women love taking sides. Women love having sides. Women use the male WtP for their own gain.

Kill a man, let him choke to death, suffocating on his own blood as he attempts to gargle his last words incoherently through blood bubbles and spittle, and watch the glee of the woman taking great pride and delight in his execution. I’ve seen it with my own eyes. I’ve lived this life before. I’ve been on both sides, conqueror and conquered. I’ve seen through both eyes. I’ve felt the adrenaline flowing with hatred and mad ecstasy, pure pleasure. I’ve felt the life fading from my consciousness, all the dreams of a lifetime fleeting out in a final burst of memory. I’ve taken lives. I’ve had my lives taken.

And I know, what women want. Women want violence, death, destruction, in their name! So don’t you fucks dare tell me you “know” something when you don’t know jack shit. If you truly disagreed with me, then you’d present some sort of rebuttal of SOME KIND. Instead you know every word I’m telling you is correct, is true, is “evil”, and it is evil because it’s true, and it’s true because it’s evil.

Truth is evil, sometimes. And many more pathetic minds here will never accept this absolute fact as a remote possibility. But your ignorance is my advantage. And I can use this knowledge against your romantic idealism. I can use your ignorance about life, facts, and truth, all against you.

Kriswest even admitted that I am true. And she knows best. So you’re all wrong, to disagree with Kriswest. You’re not intelligent enough to know how to compete with your naive, childish ideals.

Translation: I disagree.

A restatement of what has already been stated, as if it is new information or offers support for already stated but unsupported statements.

A restatement of what has already been stated, as if it is new information or offers support for already stated but unsupported statements.

  1. A restatement of what has already been stated, as if it is new information or offers support for already stated but unsupported statements. 2) A solipsistic denial of the disagreement.

How is this happening - this using it against us - outside the confine’s of your own mind?

[/quote]

  1. Tranlation: I am right. 2) Appeal to authority.

Note: I am not saying you have not had such experiences, even the past life ones. I consider that very possible. I am not saying these things do not happen. But it is time for those with only a partial, fragmented perspective on the whole to stop pretending they are the central experts. It will not bring you solace continuing to think you are THE expert with the broadest and deepest perspective. You know that your perspective has not helped you, has not eased your suffering or lonliness and it has not worked for society as a whole to look at women this way. For a long time your opinion was the dominant one and it did not help. It only led to more pain and suffering. As long as you cling to your certainty and try not to notice your own fear and confusion, you will not have your pain eased one tiny bit.

My pain killers work. But do yours???

If I say things are true about women, and they are true for women, like Kriswest, then what more do you want? Ohhhh, you want me to convince you?

You’re already convinced. All you need to do is experience, and remember. I have no doubt that you’re convinced.

:laughing: :laughing: Hon, i said you are partially right not all the way, just a couple of things does not make a whole.

It all boils down to nesting and genetic survival, not competing. We may be “civilized” but within us, our primal instincts still drive all people into actions and thoughts that are not civilized. In many ways our civilization has forced instincts to show up in abnormal ways.

It seems to me a key point in T’s formula is that women control men, and completely, and men do not control women. I think that’s just silly. These days a woman can buy a gun and equalize physical strength, but for most of our history, if we are to believe him, women have managed to control men and hurl them into the worst possible experiences - war - despite not being in positions of power in the Church, State or Business. So through the mere presence of their bloodlust and their manipulation of men - who must be both stupid and lacking in free will - women are the prime movers of history.

You’d think women would have also gotten men to be the ones who clean around the toilet.

Yours like his is melodramatic and yes his is has truth. women do control and manipulate the male. Buuhh duuh… Gee all species the male is led around by his hormone sniffing head. the fanciest noisest cock gets the hen/s. The females rule the roost though, not the rooster. The Rooster follows the lead hen not the other way around. The human female says “I want a nest” Horny human male will go get her the biggest best darn nest he can anyway he can. The female knows this. Once the nest is set up, the female claims it as her home and the male best wipe his feet. The female cares not if another female’s nest is taken as long as she gets the nest for herself. but this goes for most species on this planet. the cocky little male rooster will brag about his prowess in order to breed. It is all simply genetics and nesting.

LOL, Mo just got owned by a woman, Kriswest. :banana-dance:

Bow down to the superior argument…that would be mine in case you missed it. :banana-linedance:

Looks like this thread got moved because it pissed off the liberal, socialist, and conservative right wing regulars of this website despite evolutionary psychology studying biological behavioral patterns being very observant.

Mo remember that one thing I said about women loving watching men get humiliated, trampled, and even killed off by other dominant men? Well, that applies to philosophy, reasoning, and argument too. So Kriswest taking my side over you demonstrates how you’ve been thoroughly owned here, in this thread. That’s what is so funny! When a woman picks a side…in this case my side…it’s through a relationship of TRUST and CONFIDENCE. Kriswest has trust and confidence in my posts. That’s why she picks me, not you.

If it came down to it, she would “nest” with me over you. It’s because she trusts me more than you, CONFIDENCE.

This is the third time I’m telling you this, but, perhaps it will sink in now that you’re more thoroughly humiliated and embarrassed. It only verifies what I’ve already claimed as true. Women love violence…when not directed at them. If violence is directed according to what women want, even if that means executing other women and children, then a woman can and will agree to this. Women just want men that they can have some control over.

There are reasons for that too. But I’m not going to share these reasons with you, until you get off the ground and wipe yourself off.

Thank you for pointing out the obvious contradictory behavior, Mister Walker. I’m glad somebody else noticed. :slight_smile:

I think i may vomit over here in my corner. Dude, no way nohow nuuh uuh,nope God no hell no would i ever ever ever think about even being with you. You just aint got the cock. No i did not agree with you I said you had some truth. I did not side with you. I sided with truth not you. Your post is wrong about women loving violence , its a crock and very melodramatic. Women love a provider , a partner that won’t leave them hanging with 15 crying brats, a man that can love and care for the nest and provide the nest. She is not at all concerned how it gets done , just get it done. It is the male that chooses violence because he is horny, and wants to prove he can swing his dick in a great big circle. thats it thats all. A man wants to, (even though he thinks he is monogamous), attract more females. That is his choice his own doing, the females don’t care how it all gets done, just do it.

Fixed.

Women love violence and you know it, Kriswest. You know it, because it sexually arouses you if it occurs. But it does only occur when a woman is worth fighting over. So it doesn’t happen to all women, but, a select minority of sexually attractive or very valuable women. Some women are worth dying for. Others aren’t. The ones that are worth dying for, know that they love violence, and want to see much more men, women, and children die in their name, in their vanity. Women are this shallow. Men aren’t. Men are the ones who dislike war, because we are the ones who fight and die in it. No women, no wars.

Women could stop war and violence on Earth if you really wanted to…but you don’t. So this proves the fact. :smiley:

ROTFLMAO, yea, right. And hetromen love football, a homoerotic sport if ever I saw one.
If a female stands to the side of two males fighting over her, yes she is invested in the outcome, yes there are perverted females who do get turned on by that crap. but the natural one just kicks back waits for the right one to finish , then goes off with him. She wants the most suitable provider for her nest, thats it no more, no drama nothing… prove you are the best and you get the nest.

Why do you keep agreeing with me, Kriswest?

Football is not representative of male violence. And yes, football is for homosexuals. I agree with you about that. Male violence is more about fist fighting, and death is usually involved. If death is not involved, or the threat of death, then it’s not true violence. Most violence has become removed or sterilized in western culture. We are breeding sons into becoming little pussies. This isn’t going to bode well for western history in the end. If you raise an army of pussies and homosexuals, then it’s just a matter of time before your lands are conquered and your women raped. History will demonstrate this fact for me.

Women like you, Kriswest. Maybe you are not the type of woman valuable enough to be fought over??

We are in agreement. You should not continue to pretend like you’re not on my side, and that you don’t fully back me when it’s obvious you do.

I know you agree with me, and the entire forum does know this too. You’re mine, because I have the better arguments, the better philosophy. The truer philosophy.

:banana-dance:

Posters like Mo_ are jealous that Kriswest is on my side rather than his.

But if your philosophy is dominant, and truest, then women will agree with you, as Kriswest continues to agree with me, especially against her will as if she had a strong will. :wink: